Havern CR-d too?

Re: Admin-A Question
jd Today at 12:05 pm

Stella wrote:
The thing is jd, if these people were instantly banned, we would be seen as a forum that does not allow a voice for the other side. As irritating as it is and trust me I feel the same way as you, we do need to be seen to be fair and at least give them a chance to debate sensibly. Once debate turns into overstepping the line, they are then shown the door.


I couldn't agree with you more, this is exactly what I want too. I want to debate with people who believe the McCanns as well, I want to understand why they hold their beliefs and learn from them in a sensible manner. I respect that this case is sensitive and emotions can run high at times, but when you get posters like Ringo Star who is being just only confrontational and accusing, being the one who was actually libellous then twisting any members words to imply the same trying to scare them, this is totally over the mark. But we all know this, and he hasn't done his pro McCann cause any favours whatsoever


He sounds like one of the Amazon pitchforkers, who pretend they are 'debating' when all they are really doing is saying, I hate them f**king McCanns without swearing too much.
Same mindset - total contempt of the laws of Portugal and the UK.

They've had THREE YEARS to come to terms with this:


b) The archiving of the Process concerning Arguidos Gerald Patrick McCann and Kate Marie Healy, because there are no indications of the practise of any crime under the dispositions of article 277 number 1 of the Penal Process Code.


If they still cannot get it into their heads that they have appointed themselves judge, jury and executioners of innocent people, then they cannot complain when words like

HATERS

WITCH-BURNERS

PITCHFORKERS

LYNCH MOBS

are used to describe them.

Pity they banned Ringo after Bennett dragged him/her into a letter to Carter Ruck, isn't it?

Second, a poster on that forum called 'Ringo', who was allowed on that forum despite it being clear to all of us that he was a supporter of the McCanns,

Oops!

Ringo was Libellous?. I must have missed that bit. The truth of the matter is that he warned them. And he was right. But they can't cope with right.

Never mind, with a bit of luck their Hero will get a chance to put his case in Court.

Two minutes on the forum and jd is already calling the shots?

They were warned, and warned, Sabot. I would think Carter Ruck has been swamped with screengrabs of that thread, including the vile insinuations about the reason the barn doesn't have windows down one side.
Personally, I would think that it because it is near a public footpath, and who needs stalkers like them peering in?
Never mind, Bennett will be able to explain and more all that in the High Court.


Two minutes on the forum and jd is already calling the shots?

Isn't it pathetic, Tony? Transparent as glass.

Isn't it pathetic, Tony? Transparent as glass.
They appear to rate everyone with the same rating they have.
Just because they are stupid they believe everyone else to be.
Boy, are they in for a rude awakening!

http://thehoundingofthemccans.blogspot.com/?zx=bd7d5ff2f7285e1a


Like it - The Secret Society of Bentits.