Havern CR-d too?

bb1 wrote:It could be any of them, Tony- remember, Bennett and Bret were allies till they had that about...whatever it was.
There are some seriously disturbed people in the Bret camp.

Well, if Mr. Smethurst is on the ball, he will have the IP numbers of the posters.
He and his Legal Reps will be making sure it never happens again.

Oh - remember Bennett trawling that sick joke site for new members?

crazytony wrote:

bb1 wrote:It could be any of them, Tony- remember, Bennett and Bret were allies till they had that about...whatever it was.
There are some seriously disturbed people in the Bret camp.

Well, if Mr. Smethurst is on the ball, he will have the IP numbers of the posters.
He and his Legal Reps will be making sure it never happens again.

The awful thing is that it never should have happened at all.

It's staggering when you consider all the things he has accused the McCanns and/or their circle of being or doing, isn't it?

bb1 wrote:Oh - remember Bennett trawling that sick joke site for new members?

Forgot about that, Bonny. What a weirdo the freak is.

Bennett knows the truth. That is why he has cut and run leaving Havern to deal with it.
He will get the shock of his life if the Groomer ups and sues him. That would be the icing on the cake if it does happens.

crazytony wrote:Bennett knows the truth. That is why he has cut and run leaving Havern to deal with it.
He will get the shock of his life if the Groomer ups and sues him. That would be the icing on the cake if it does happens.

He has to know the truth, Tony. The coward.

Now, when you think about it, why not sue him? It's certainly a realistic concept isn't it?

I wonder just who he recruited?

Good question, Bonny.

Now, the best thing that he could have done would have been to simply delete the entire post that he made and not mention it again. However, Bennett doesn't operate like that, does he? Any opportunity........

And there we have it, Lily. He went looking for new Hounders on that site IN FULL KNOWLEDGE OF THE SORT OF FREAKS POSTING ON IT.

I guess they are his kind of people on there?

bb1 wrote:

I wonder just who he recruited?

So Bennett is a member of Facebook is he?
Must be, to be able to post.

Oh yes he is Tony. One of his interests is the Sherlock Holmes Museum.

bennett is indeed a member, and has links to his bro and assorted family members through him, which leads to his father called Eric who died in 2005 leaving a widow called Ria----------------a m a z i n g what u can find out via facebook

It sure is rhodes, as I saw all that too.

I think his daughter Anita is a physiotherapist--if that's correct she could do with twisting tone the comb's neck

Rhodes - .

What is this about?

With thanks as always to........

http://stopthemyths.prophpbb.com/topic972-100.html


Re: Bennett Playing Silly Games!!
Posted by Alibobs » Sun Aug 07, 2011 1:18 am

Re: We've Been Cart Rucked!

Post jd Today at 1:07 am
Tonight is one of celebration! (more than you realise) Lets get into the party spirit
drinks


Last edited by jd on Sun Aug 07, 2011 1:08 am; edited 1 time in total

_______________________________________________
"leaving no stone unturned...even if it is 49.2 metres away"


jd

Posts: 288
Join date: 2011-07-22

Back to top Go down

*
*
*
*
*
*
*

Re: We've Been Cart Rucked!

Post lj Today at 1:08 am
I'm always in for a party!
What are we celebrating??

A question that has been nagging me for a bit - did Bennett finally lose it (ie the Smethurst items) before or after bret came on the scene? I know he has been insinuating this and that, but when did the actual final act commence? Could it be cos he sees a rival in bret? Could bret in fact be egging him on? bret is quite capable of pushing someone over the top and then standing back and watching the mayhem; they were on the same forum/site/ together until recently, were they not? Pms are a fav of bennett .... ?? LL

Lamplighter wrote:A question that has been nagging me for a bit - did Bennett finally lose it (ie the Smethurst items) before or after bret came on the scene? I know he has been insinuating this and that, but when did the actual final act commence? Could it be cos he sees a rival in bret? Could bret in fact be egging him on? bret is quite capable of pushing someone over the top and then standing back and watching the mayhem; they were on the same forum/site/ together until recently, were they not? Pms are a fav of bennett .... ?? LL

Do you think that Bennett could have thought that he had attracted some heavy support? Pat Brown AND Bret Whatsisname. These are two very high flyers if you like their sort of crap, which he obviously will have done.

C'est tres amusant that so many of these intellectual giants have met their armageddon. Such a pity if we never hear from them again. Don't you think.

mrs trellis wrote:He started on Smethurst before Bret turned up.

I dont think Bret and Bennett get on - two massive egos, one of them clearly a total fag hag, the other one a homophobe.

Thankfully it's split the haters camp too.

There is no doubt in my mind that Bennett has upped the anti since the advent of Bret and Brown. Perhaps he sees it as some sort of competition.

Admin Today at 7:46

Ringo wrote:
Admin wrote:
Ringo wrote:
Was that letter not originally sent to Tony Bennett and is he not actually admin on this forum? Why did he not tell the forum owner about it?


Tony is not admin, but he does have mod status.



The question still stands.


At this point in time it is not only me who didn't know about the 2nd letter.
-----------

Aw, bless, Bennett didn't tell anyone - except HLM.

The rest of the world knew as soon as she posted the letters and started boasting.

I suppose they do know that rumours are flying that the only place 'Groomer' etc., exist is in the minds of the insane pitchforkers who created the characters and tried to set up Bennett's victim.

I am sure it will all come out in court.

bb1 wrote: Admin Today at 7:46

Ringo wrote:
Admin wrote:
Ringo wrote:
Was that letter not originally sent to Tony Bennett and is he not actually admin on this forum? Why did he not tell the forum owner about it?


Tony is not admin, but he does have mod status.



The question still stands.


At this point in time it is not only me who didn't know about the 2nd letter.
-----------

Aw, bless, Bennett didn't tell anyone - except HLM.

The rest of the world knew as soon as she posted the letters and started boasting.

I suppose they do know that rumours are flying that the only place 'Groomer' etc., exist is in the minds of the insane pitchforkers who created the characters and tried to set up Bennett's victim.

I am sure it will all come out in court.

Bonny, I can see the guy the fools have named the groomer, suing.

The libel is being repeated on MM too, Tony - they are fools if they think CR are unaware of that.
On the other hand, if they don't care if they end up in trouble for repeating filthy, disgusting lies which presently appear to originate from a bunch of hater trolls - well, let them get on with it.

Just a reminder of what CR said:

Not only are these grotesque allegations highly defamatory of our client, they are entirely untrue

You would think that was clear enough, but seemingly not; the pitchforkers seem unaware of the penalties for repeating particularly disgusting falsehoods, smears and libel.

bb1 wrote:The libel is being repeated on MM too, Tony - they are fools if they think CR are unaware of that.
On the other hand, if they don't care if they end up in trouble for repeating filthy, disgusting lies which presently appear to originate from a bunch of hater trolls - well, let them get on with it.

Just a reminder of what CR said:

Not only are these grotesque allegations highly defamatory of our client, they are entirely untrue

You would think that was clear enough, but seemingly not; the pitchforkers seem unaware of the penalties for repeating particularly disgusting falsehoods, smears and libel.

True Bonny. Besides, we are not the ones picking up the bill for their stupidity.

Imbecile on Hellhole:

one would have thought the a responsible person would issue a denial statement which would have been more effective than bringing attention to themselves.

He did, fool - through his lawyers. It reads:

Not only are these grotesque allegations highly defamatory of our client, they are entirely untrue

Bennett's victim is prepared to take this all the way; if Bennett folds, then it will be a pretty fair sign that he knows who was behind this.