..So, just who is Soya Pouter?

Discerning viewer Ho Ho - another LOSER.

Lord have mercy....


Names and other info should be shared between trusted collegues so it won't be lost or stolen. I'm sure Sonia will have backed everything up in inaccessible places...encrypted of course.

...and when the time comes, only give out copies

==========
If Sonia u/l to YouTube it will be available to an untold number of people. It won't stop us d/l it if UK blocks it as it will be still available.

Hope the docu gets finished as planned and I am looking forward to seeing it..

Yes, I think we all are. It's shaping up to be even funnier than Hoho's efforts.

Omg, you really could NOT make this up. It is going to be so outrageously funny.

Can't wait.

They're beside themselves with excitement already - always a sign that it's going to end in tears for them.

The thing is that they've got this weird idea that we don't want to see this documentary even made, let alone broadcast, while in fact we can hardly wait.

Of course, Sabot. They think that it is filled with the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth. Whereas the truth is that it is filled with 7 years of lies, myths and distortions.

What's not to like?

Oh dear, deluded forkers imagine Soya is Hitting Nerves.

Hardly, only Funnybones. As you say, Sabot, we WANT to see her latest YouTube comedy.

She's getting her 'research' from Bennett and co, FFS, with a little help from one of the nastiest multi-id trolls in this part of the internet. The haters are kidding themselves if they think it's going to be anything except yet another trainwreck - if it ever sees the light of day.

I am surprised they haven't noticed Soya's get-out clause.

Soya's idea of Truthseeking:



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aYv3O476PTA

Lizard TV - Sonia Poulton trawls the pits and interviews crazy Birch

That effort, made before she Icke, is well-nigh unwatchable because it is so bad. Not least because Bonkers Birch also has a horrible voice, and a few minutes of him sounding like a rusty saw, and her squeaking, shrieking, and pulling faces, is unbearable.

Her Skype interview with Mutton was likewise, well, dreadful and amateurish. One would forgiven for suspecting she actually isn't all that good, and now the MSM has seemingly dropped her from its list of sofa speakers, she's desperate to find a new audience that won't notice just how unprofessional she is.

Oh dear. Soya interviewing convicted maniac conspiraloon Michael Shrimpton.

A pattern seems to be emerging.....

A pattern seems to be emerging.....

DING DING DING.

I haven't seen one good piece of production or writing from Soya. Not one. Narcissistic pieces for the Mail, complete with Mail (c) sad face, don't count.

Maybe she produced masterpieces worthy of a Nobel prize during her gangsta rap days, and these gems have passed everyone else by? In the opinion of many, she's no more a 'journalist' than her chum Mutton is - Letters to the Editor and one failed mis-mem do not a Pulitzer Prize make.

And hands up, how many people cringe every time she parrots the word 'doorstepping', to make it sound as if she's edgy, alternative and keeping it real, instead of being a pseud and a pest? It's just a matter of time before one of the people she's chasing around after calls the police to deal with her and her unsavoury man friend. IMO, of course.

allowing Rosalinda Hutton a half-hour whinge about why she was being persecuted by people on Twitter

That's actually rather funny, for the Harlow Hounder. Actually, I suspect he has hit on why this much-touted video going to be a complete trainwreck.

For starters, Soya knows naff-all about the actual case, just what she's been told by her fan club of armchair defectives. She only got involved when she started interviewing conspiraloons for Icke TV, before the fall-out.

There's nothing solid or grounded about her stuff, it's all touchy-feely, emotional, he said -she said hormonal Twitter nonsense, the kind of guff that turns up in the women's section of the Daily Mail, with a touch of conspiracy theory thrown in to spice it up and make it seem important.

Which it most definitely isn't.

Good post, Bonny.

As a matter of fact, I have never seen anything as exciting as Poulton trying to talk to that cop.

Someone else gets it...

Quote from: Alfred R Jones on Today at 09:25:23 AM
As well as claiming this film is about "Justice 4 Maddie", Sonia also seems intent on using it to get retribution for Brenda. Isn't that really what this film is all about?

Yup, a conspiraloon gossip and bitchfest about twitter crap.

Sonia Poulton
‏@SoniaPoulton
Thank you for lovely messages of support, oh Tweeters of Twitter. Here's wishing for a New Year of breaking down the old barriers to truth.

$9, phoney as. IMO.

You don't think she is a manipulative user do you?

Oh, perish the thought!

Easy way to tell she's a phoney - IMO. Decent people don't try to rebuild their non-existent 'careers' by adding to the torment of the families of abducted children.

There's only one kind of person that does that.

ETA:

Shy Keenan and Dr Sara Payne have NO doubt whatsoever about the real motives of those that troll and abuse the families of missing children. And I have 100 times the respect for those ladies, than I ever will for some wannabee like Soya exploiting an abducted child for her own ends.

Why does she think Scotland Yard would be interested in interviewing her? Tis more likely that she is attempting to obtain an interview from them, so she must think they are stupid if she thinks they wouldn't see that one coming.

Same delusion and arrogance that afflicts all of them, Sabot. Can you imagine the reaction at the Met when that airhead offered them the benefit of her advice? Must have been the best laugh they'd had since Bennett dropped his pretendy 'dossiers' in.

delusion and arrogance: antis indeed.

So why won't she release her "documentary" until after The Inquest? Hope of a revelation? Fear of libel? And where is she going to put it? You Tube?
No MSM is going to take it up. They've got their own axes to grind. Although she could be one of them. Just another Troll.

Why do these wannabes keep on appearing? Don't they ever learn anything from the last one who fell flat?

Ah, it's the perfect excuse NOT to put it on YouTube, Sabot. As we all know, the coroner is NOT going to go along with their bizarre fantasies about St Sweepy - indeed, is more likely to tell them all a few home truths. So she can come out with some waffle about legal reasons, having built up a captive audience of idiots.

Sonia Poulton
‏@SoniaPoulton
@Julespick72 mwah mwah mwah mwah mwah snuggle huggle Lol hope you're feeling better petal x 2015 is going to be the BOOOOOOOOM promise xxx

Like I said, phoney as a $9.

Ah. That's probably it. Legal Reasons. Her followers won't like that. Sonya has been Silenced. But at least we won't have to listen to that horrible voice.