Jayelles' Rebuttal of Pat Brown

bb1 wrote:I think it is a very good bit of photoshopping, LL

Thank you, just a thick, stupid furriner, that's me!!!! LL only fit to be stay and

I've lost the link to it. Anyone?

Funny blooper

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E599lqC7V9Mhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E599lqC7V9M

It may not even be deliberate, Jayelles - that would involve effort on Ms Brown's part.

My own suspicion is that she got involved with this bunch of pitchforkers who assured her 'everyone' agreed with them, and she saw a chance to make a quick buck without any work.

Her 'research' seems to have consisted of reading Bennett's bullsh*t; it is sloppy and inaccurate from start to finish.

As for this nonsense about Calpol....a real profiler would have done a bit of checking before they mouthed off.

They might even have read this:

http://justice4mccannfam.5forum.biz/t1407-calpol-letter-from-johnson-johnson


Calpol - Letter from Johnson & Johnson
by Hael on Wed May 13, 2009 8:59 pm

Our Ref: XXXXXX-Letter
Date: XXXX 2009


Dear Madam/Sir

Thank you for your recent enquiry concerning Calpol Infant Suspension (120mg paracetamol per 5ml).

Calpol Infant Suspension contains paracetamol which is used to relieve pain and reduce fever. As you rightly point out, it does not have sedative properties. We are keen to ensure that consumers understand how to use all of our products correctly. In the case of Calpol, we ensure clear messages in our advertising to ensure correct usage. The product also contains clear instructions for use on the box and within the enclosed patient information leaflet.
Thank you for your concern regarding the reputation of our product and the suggestion that we contact Mr Amaral. We will give your suggestion due consideration.


Yours sincerely

Johnson & Johnson Ltd

XXXXXX XXXXXXXX BSc (Hons)
Medical Information Officer
Professional Information Ltd
on behalf of Johnson & Johnson Ltd

So, where does that leave Ms Brown, and statements like:

Profile of the Disappearance of Madeleine McCann
Calpol may cause drowsiness in children. No physical activities while medicated, like climbing on sofas.

One would hope, Heading for a big bucks lawsuit from Johnson & Johnson.

BTW, whoever heard of a 'sedative' that made drowsy people lively?

Look forward to reading it, Jayelles - I've stickied this thread too, to keep it clear of other news items.

Well done, Jayelles - no sign of the 'profiler' dealing with any of the misinformation she has been pushing? No?

Oh, and I must question her English, too, when she is describing predators -

he will keep on trolling for his victims

No, dear, he will keep on TRAWLING for victims; trolling is what your new best friends do

What an excellent job you have done, as always, Jayelles.

I think you have said it all here, Jayelles:

But perhaps the most major flaw of all in Brown’s theory is the motive she offers for everyone’s agreement to go along with Gerry McCann’s plan – namely to avoid getting into trouble for leaving their children alone. Why is this a flaw? Because without exception, everyone in the group immediately admitted to the police that they had done precisely that.

If it were not so serious, it would be laughable that any 'profiler' could produce such dross.

It's probably tempting fate to say so, but she seems to have gone quiet....

bb1 wrote:It's probably tempting fate to say so, but she seems to have gone quiet....

Remember it is a holiday here Bonny. Where she is, she is three hours ahead of us in CA.
Ms. Brown may be watching the Fireworks and enjoying a Barbeque.
Which is something I shall be doing at 8pm CA time

Ah, of course, Tony!
I am sure she will be delighted to read about her new friend on your blog...

And enjoy the fireworks and BBQ!

I actually don't understand what she is talking about, Jayelles. I can't follow her reasoning.
And she is doing that, Why didn't Kate... thing so many of the pitchforkers do...

Any real profiler, policeman, psychologist....any professional...knows people just do not act logically at moments of stress or crisis.

Profile of the Disappearance of Madeleine McCann
What abductor would sedate the children he wasn't taking?

Woman's an idiot.

Love the new blog Jayelles!

Is this her?

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:kog0RbDDoxIJ:jillhavern.forumotion.net/t1891-wendy-murphy-writes-about-the-cases-of-jonbenet-ramsey-caylee-anthony-and-madeleine-mccann-in-the-context-of-child-sexual-abuse-and-the-use-of-sedatives+Wendy+Murphy&cd=13&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=uk&client=firefox-a&source=www.google.co.uk

Only just about every single one of the leading pitchforkers, Jayelles...

I see what you mean, Jayelles:



So, she thinks 'they' found Madeleine after Kate raised the alarm? When Ms Brown earlier had Gerry wandering around PDL with his child's body?
Is Ms Brown suggesting that Gerry then took his child's body back to 5A to be 'found' some time after 10?

All this despite the fact that Gerry was, in fact, in the restaurant prior to 10, as was established in the final report?

It was established that at the time that was being mentioned, GERALD McCANN was sitting at the table, in the Tapas Restaurant.

Ms Brown really should find a new career - fortune telling, maybe?

That lady should know, Jayelles. The antis are minimizing every family who have had to endure that horrendous fate.

That is an excellent piece by Duece, quote:

A criminal profiler does not kill hope for justice, does not kill compassion for victims of crime’s, does not kill innocent people’s good names and does not kill the hard work in gaining respect by real criminal profilers. Pat Brown is more akin to a professional ‘virtual’ assassin.

IMO, she is little more than a mouthy vigilante, with no concept of justice and no respect for the law.

I am lost for words to describe Pat Brown. But I'm working on it as I prefer words of more than four letters and one syllable.

Concrete ruminant?

bb1 wrote:Concrete ruminant?

No where near rude enough. Foetid Vermin is closer. But not quite there.

Right!!!




[img][/img]

Carter Rucked????!
Guess so

Oh dear, Chicane.

She had stated that she had no worries where they were concerned.