WHAT IS THIS TW''@ish CARP FROM BENNETT?

I can't get my head around this latest Bennett "Research". It has to be an obsession with Paedophilia to link this unrelated man to the stepson of Robert Murat just because he might have the same name, although even that is debatable.
But Bennett fell on it like a ravening wolf, and then spread it with glee. The fact that this is inaccurate hardly explains the horror of what he has done. Even retracted at a later date does not excuse or explain what goes on in Bennett's diseased mind.
Bennett will jump on anything even remotely related to The McCann Case without a thought of what he is doing or the harm he might cause.

This other Chapman has been caught and punished, and probably still in prison, certainly on The Sex Offenders Register. So what was Bennett's purpose? He can't have been worried about other small children. No, he just relished causing shock and horror. He's a monster on the rampage.

bb1 wrote:Ratonthebeam? That was notorious hater Famous Grouse's earlier name. Doesn't mean it is actually from her, though - you know what they are like for cloning people to stir up trouble.

The Email Address does say Raty on the Beam.

Be fair, Sabot, he did manage to cause shock and horror - he just didn't intend it to be aimed at him.

After that, anyone who believes a single word Bennett or the hounders say should seek help from mental health specialists.

Sabot wrote:I can't get my head around this latest Bennett "Research". It has to be an obsession with Paedophilia to link this unrelated man to the stepson of Robert Murat just because he might have the same name, although even that is debatable.
But Bennett fell on it like a ravening wolf, and then spread it with glee. The fact that this is inaccurate hardly explains the horror of what he has done. Even retracted at a later date does not excuse or explain what goes on in Bennett's diseased mind.
Bennett will jump on anything even remotely related to The McCann Case without a thought of what he is doing or the harm he might cause.

This other Chapman has been caught and punished, and probably still in prison, certainly on The Sex Offenders Register. So what was Bennett's purpose? He can't have been worried about other small children. No, he just relished causing shock and horror. He's a monster on the rampage.

I agree fuly with this Sabot. I can only put it down to desperation for attention and to be seen as a mover and shaker.

I do not think he has any idea of the distress he can cause innocent people he drags into this - such as this young man. A prime example of a narcissist, perhaps?

sans_souci wrote:

Sabot wrote:I can't get my head around this latest Bennett "Research". It has to be an obsession with Paedophilia to link this unrelated man to the stepson of Robert Murat just because he might have the same name, although even that is debatable.
But Bennett fell on it like a ravening wolf, and then spread it with glee. The fact that this is inaccurate hardly explains the horror of what he has done. Even retracted at a later date does not excuse or explain what goes on in Bennett's diseased mind.
Bennett will jump on anything even remotely related to The McCann Case without a thought of what he is doing or the harm he might cause.

This other Chapman has been caught and punished, and probably still in prison, certainly on The Sex Offenders Register. So what was Bennett's purpose? He can't have been worried about other small children. No, he just relished causing shock and horror. He's a monster on the rampage.

I agree fuly with this Sabot. I can only put it down to desperation for attention and to be seen as a mover and shaker.

I do not think he has any idea of the distress he can cause innocent people he drags into this - such as this young man. A prime example of a narcissist, perhaps?

Personally I think he is a Sociopath with Psychotic Tendencies. He actively encourages his band of sychophants to spread this stuff around. That is a deliberate attempt to cause harm.

I had to laugh at MM - one of them posted about some TV programme...

Yesterday, I saw a programme called "The Killing of Sophie Elliot", which is a true story of a young brilliant economics student in NZ who was stabbed 216 times by her tutor because she did not want to have anything more to do with him. During the programme, a psychiatrist discussed the man's narcissism and stated that the narcissist can never accept rejection and will most likely revert to revenge and retaliation. It was chilling to watch this man on the stand during his trial, he was totally unable to see how his behaviour in court shocked people.

Bizarrely, they have been trying to convince themselves that that sounds just like the McCanns..

They were too blind to see that it fits Gonc's vendetta to a T.

His behaviour does indeed shock people; he has a CRIMINAL conviction for lying; his whole lifestyle is chaotic; he thinks he is entitled to more than other people - look at his attitude to paying his debts and taxes.

Their blindness to the obvious is staggering.

Goncalo Amaral also has a tendency towards violence. Frequently.

bb1 wrote:Ratonthebeam? That was notorious hater Famous Grouse's earlier name. Doesn't mean it is actually from her, though - you know what they are like for cloning people to stir up trouble.

the email came from ratyonethebeam

Sounds like someone cloning her to cause trouble of some description, Tony?

bb1 wrote:Sounds like someone cloning her to cause trouble of some description, Tony?

I was a annoyed to receive it initially Bonny. However, I have no intentions of playing their stupid games of he said she said.

Some idiot tried this a while back, Tony - MsMarbles got peculiar emails from some clone or other who supposedly had all sorts of stories to tell.

Usual stupid games from the nasties, of course. I don't know why they bother, it's all been done before.

Don't you just love the irony of Bennett's forum having a sticky thread called:

Sticky: The great difference between the truth and a lie
by Get 'em Gonçalo

When it is YET AGAIN their own Dear Leader who has been caught telling huge, horrible LIES about innocent people?

Any sign of Bennett apologising to the Murat family yet?

bb1 wrote:Don't you just love the irony of Bennett's forum having a sticky thread called:

Sticky: The great difference between the truth and a lie
by Get 'em Gonçalo

When it is YET AGAIN their own Dear Leader who has been caught telling huge, horrible LIES about innocent people?

Any sign of Bennett apologising to the Murat family yet?

He needs a court order issued against him before he will apologize. Only then will he whimper like the gutless coward he really is.

It's all Robert Murat's fault. He was a suspect.

crazytony wrote:

bb1 wrote:Don't you just love the irony of Bennett's forum having a sticky thread called:

Sticky: The great difference between the truth and a lie
by Get 'em Gonçalo

When it is YET AGAIN their own Dear Leader who has been caught telling huge, horrible LIES about innocent people?

Any sign of Bennett apologising to the Murat family yet?

He needs a court order issued against him before he will apologize. Only then will he whimper like the gutless coward he really is.

He needs something, Tony.

Before personal computers and the internet, he could hardly have done much damage. I mean he would have been relegated to his local pub or maybe discussing it with his neighbor while he was hanging his smalls on the washing line.

Didn't Bennett and Co say that the McCanns did it all, in Apartment 5A ??

If so where does Murat fit in all of this then to them? Or is it that they are trying to get more of the bestiality porn that ((surprisingly)) came from Amaral and was false.

Robert Murat was made the first official suspect over the disappearance of Madeleine McCann. Madeleine was reported missing on 3 May 2007. Murat was pulled in for questioning just 12 days later, on 15 May. British security service and police profilers had already identified Murat as a likely suspect. They thought he fitted the profile of the person who had abducted Madeleine.

I believe that the above is a matter of record, so not libelous. However, if it should be deleted please do it, Bonny, or let me know?

I wonder if Bennett is getting ready to hedge his bets in case he has to change tactics, since he has so many legal problems?

ETA: The part in italics comes from Bennett's highly libelous retracted opus.

muratfan wrote:Didn't Bennett and Co say that the McCanns did it all, in Apartment 5A ??

If so where does Murat fit in all of this then to them? Or is it that they are trying to get more of the bestiality porn that ((surprisingly)) came from Amaral and was false.

I am sure all will become clear soon. With a bit of luck someone has a trace on Bennett's computer and is documenting all.

British security service and police profilers had already identified Murat as a likely suspect.

And Bennett's a bit off-message there; he is supposed to blame UK journos for it, not UK profilers.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2011/oct/19/libel-reform-juries-dropped

Libel trials by jury should be abolished for all but exceptional cases involving public figures, a parliamentary committee has recommended.

The joint Commons and Lords committee on the draft defamation bill has proposed sweeping changes to the UK's libel laws, including new measures to curb online defamation and proposals that would make it more difficult for large corporations to sue newspapers.

MPs and peers recommended tackling the culture of anonymous online comments with a new notice and takedown procedure, proposing that unidentified commenters on blogs and social networks such as Facebook and Twitter should have allegedly defamatory material removed by internet hosts or service providers if they refuse to reveal their identity.

The report also proposes replacing the so-called "Reynolds defence" of qualified privilege for responsible journalism in the public interest with a new statutory defence.

Interesting, Tony...I can think of one or two who may be in for a very nasty shock.

bb1 wrote:Interesting, Tony...I can think of one or two who may be in for a very nasty shock.

I can see socks disappearing from the Internet, in a flash

Oh, so can I, Tony. Look what has just appeared - it's in PDF form, and there's a lot of it, so I will just post the link for now:

http://regretsandramblings.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/Final-report-of-the-joint-committee-on-the-draft-defamation-bill.pdf

Some expressions of opinion, most obviously value judgments, may
by their nature be incapable of being proved to be right or wrong. The important public
interest in issues being discussed and debated would be seriously damaged if proving the
truth of a statement was the only defence available to a libel claim. Yet the law should not
allow critics to ride roughshod over the reputation of others simply by dressing up any
kind of attack as an expression of opinion. There has to be a careful consideration of what
constitutes an opinion and the circumstances in which a defamatory opinion ought to be
legally protected.

That's their Free Speach out the window, if and when this becomes law.

The defence of qualified privilege is defeated if the publisher was malicious in
the sense that the dominant motive for publication was improper.


There's way too much to take in on a quick read, but I suspect that, if this becomes law, the party is over for those lunatics.