BENNETT LECTURES HARLOW STAR *AND SMIFFY*

It's really interesting how Karma works........

Just think. Amaral could have had that Job, if only he'd behaved himself.

They can't behave themselves though, can they?

What was it that media lawyer said about Lord McAlpine bringing legal action? Oh yes:

But internet users who explicitly linked McAlpine to the abuse allegations online would not be protected by the BBC's defence.

Niri Shan, head of media law at London solicitors' firm Taylor Wessing, warned that "ignorance is no defence" for Twitter users and that they could easily find themselves in the high court if McAlpine chooses to take action.

And there was Bennett, directing traffic to some of the nastiest, most malicious, falsehoods on the internet. Wonder if he still thinks that was big and clever?

http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2012/nov/10/newsnight-mcalpine-scoop-rumour

As the witch-hunt mounted, the ITV This Morning host Philip Schofield even thrust at David Cameron a list of names, culled from the internet, of what he alleged were Tory paedophiles.

Eventually the Guardian came to the rescue of the former Tory treasurer on Friday, by finding and publishing the evidence that exonerated him. Within 24 hours his accuser, Messham, had retracted and apologised for a case of mistaken identity, while the futures of the Bureau of Investigative Journalism, the Newsnight programme and the BBC director general himself have been all thrown into severe doubt.

Rarely can a journalistic balloon have been so totally empty – and punctured so rapidly.

Wonder how Bennett feels about that? He's the one who was running around trying to drum up trade for the nastiest of the false accusations.

Bennett's still obsessed with people who have made a success of their lives, unlike him, is he?

Bet SUCCESSFUL people can tell the difference between Hibs and Hearts. And between masons and the Knights of St Columba

I see Havern's banner on her shite is even wrong... BENNETT A RETIRED LAWYER .... He didn't even make it to qualified solicitor.

So if they cannot even get that little detail right, then there is no hope for them

The one that makes me laugh is the heading on one of those interminable sub-forums about,

leaving a trail of cadaver odour and blood.

That that didn't happen anywhere except in their ghoulish imaginations doesn't seem to matter to them.

Mind you, they did stick a High Court judge on their banner, with words he simply never said, so what else can you expect?

MOM OF TWO ‏@GILLYSPOT
@ModNrodder @Troll_Nemesis @Chicane68 I think it is a positive step for believers & non #McCann believers to discuss evidence as adults

Discuss this.

ETA, the only people who need to be 'discussing' anything with Bennett are the representatives of Carter Ruck. When he is in the dock in the High Court. I am sure they will do an excellent job of 'discussing'.

bb1 wrote:MOM OF TWO ‏@GILLYSPOT
@ModNrodder @Troll_Nemesis @Chicane68 I think it is a positive step for believers & non #McCann believers to discuss evidence as adults

Discuss this.

ETA, the only people who need to be 'discussing' anything with Bennett are the representatives of Carter Ruck. When he is in the dock in the High Court. I am sure they will do an excellent job of 'discussing'.

Adults could be useful.

Re: Child Abuse Scandal (How close to the very top levels of society does this paedophile scandal reach?}
Jean Today at 3:00 pm

There are so many allegations against Lord McAlpine on the Internet and, while of course this does not mean that they are true, they should be investigated properly.

On that logic, then all the allegations about Bennett on the internet should be investigated properly. Or is that different?

If only someone would Investigate Bennett, and his obsession with Child Abuse, and Sordid Practices that most of us have never heard of.
I wouldn't mind a look at his Hard Drive. His Computer Hard Drive, I mean.

Gillytroll plays armchair defective, judge and jury:

Re: So what was Leveson about then?
Gillyspot Today at 5:21 am

I have done further research & if this is the Same David Rose (not deputy editor @ Mail on Sunday - another David Rose who writes for Mail on Sunday) he should be jailed at the very least.

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/damianthompson/100096195/johann-hari-wikipedia-and-a-porn-site-an-extraordinary-new-development/



Think she'd better polish her 'research' skills, as they are totally different people.

But note how quick she is condemn someone on the basis of bolleaux. Her idea of 'research' seems to be reading the Icke forum.

More nastiness from Gillytroll:

http://exposingthemyths.blogspot.co.uk/2012/11/a-hollow-apology.html

http://thehoundingofthemccans.blogspot.co.uk/2012/11/it-is-about-time-too.html

Wonder if Bennett's worried about what he was so merrily twittering last week?

bb1 wrote:More nastiness from Gillytroll:

http://exposingthemyths.blogspot.co.uk/2012/11/a-hollow-apology.html

That is just plain wrong. But what more can we expect from a black and white spotted hound!

It's the hound I'm sorry for, having its identity stolen by a hatertroll.

At least she isn't abusing Kate McCann's photo anymore. Oh how I laughed when she said that I had nothing to do with her changing her avatar. ORLY.

Pants of Ganga had that avatar so that is who Gillyspot is/was.

Sabot, it was hilarious when she tried to deny it all.

lily wrote:Pants of Ganga had that avatar so that is who Gillyspot is/was.

Sabot, it was hilarious when she tried to deny it all.

And it only took her about an hour to cotton on. So we know she reads here.

Nasty, vicious, lying little toad she is.

Yoo Hoo, Gilly. Change the record, will ya. You are getting very boring.

Her 'research' is funny, though - like demanding that someone be jailed, because of something someone else using the same name did. Mind you, that's about the level of all their 'research'.

bb1 wrote:Her 'research' is funny, though - like demanding that someone be jailed, because of something someone else using the same name did. Mind you, that's about the level of all their 'research'.

Just a second, Bonny. She is one serious researcher who more than likely graduated from the Bennett School of Researching?

Are you saying that that School is no good?

lily wrote:

bb1 wrote:Her 'research' is funny, though - like demanding that someone be jailed, because of something someone else using the same name did. Mind you, that's about the level of all their 'research'.

Just a second, Bonny. She is one serious researcher who more than likely graduated from the Bennett School of Researching?

Are you saying that that School is no good?

Just don't hang The Graduation Certificate on the wall. You could get arrested.

But, Sabot. I have just listed it in my resume for a very important job.......lavatory attendant at (snipped).

Hounder Research has been nominated for....