Express: Maddie Kidnap Photo Shock

They all have too much 'previous' for stunts like this, Sabot. This is the kind of moron who enjoys it...

deborah butler ‏@IWILLNOTGOAWAY
@glitter_brain @katycakes1 @dailyexpressuk @ukpcc @AnnaEsse & what would leveson make of it ? #McCann

He'd wonder who was playing nasty, sick games with no purpose other than to hurt Madeleine McCann and her family, for starters.

Anyone seen Duarte Levy recently? He's a dab hand at hoaxes.

Forker:

im sure there will be people from sy that reads the express -- hope that sy are knocking on doors asking questions about this headline in the express -

Oh, so do we! Or Interpol, if the culprit is in Brussels - 24 photos, anyone?

I predict more of this crap now Creepy Gonc is painted into a corner, his cult will be desperate.

This is seriously into the realms of Wasting Police Time. But no doubt Scotland Yard will find out who done it.

longjohnsilver ‏@longjoh44309217
#McCann i have a brillant idea for a movie title carry on up the mcanns!!!

Sez the moron who gives morons a bad name

Does Gonc have any supporters whose IQ is greater than their shoe size?

I think it's about time that any site with a misleading Madeleine McCann family title, be pulled from the internet.

bb1 wrote:longjohnsilver ‏@longjoh44309217
#McCann i have a brillant idea for a movie title carry on up the mcanns!!!

Sez the moron who gives morons a bad name

Does Gonc have any supporters whose IQ is greater than their shoe size?

I think her IQ falls in the old style shoe sizing. Size 6 if she's got big feet.

lily wrote:I think it's about time that any site with a misleading Madeleine McCann family title, be pulled from the internet.

Agree; at the very least, it is sickening to see people who actually hate Madeleine use her picture, as if they care.

J4 is the only forum entitled to use Madeleine's image and name, as far as I am concerned - neither Myths nor us do it.

But the hate sites seem to think they can help themselves to Madeleine's name.

If members of the general public might possibly get confused, then it has to be stopped.

I don't care if this is a WUM story or not, this proves the point.

lily wrote:If members of the general public might possibly get confused, then it has to be stopped.

I don't care if this is a WUM story or not, this proves the point.

We don't even know if the basis of this is a Wum story, but one of two things happened. Either they did mistake Pamalam's Site for a genuine McCann Site. Or Pamalam had some idea of what was going on. Why else would she print a supposedly with held photograph of Madeleine which Scotland Yard didn't want printed?
She could find herself in real trouble, whichever of the two is correct.

What is really worrying is that pamalan and Bennett have both admitted to receiving material intended for the McCanns; one has to wonder how much they have been sent that they HAVEN'T confessed to.

Because neither of them would lift a finger to help find Madeleine - quite the opposite. They both have too much riding on their support for Gonc to do anything to help Madeleine McCann.

Why else would she print a supposedly with held photograph of Madeleine which Scotland Yard didn't want printed?

Exactly, Sabot.

Because neither of them would lift a finger to help find Madeleine - quite the opposite. They both have too much riding on their support for Gonc to do anything to help Madeleine McCann.

That is the sick truth.

If that was Madeleine it could have lead to her death, even at this late stage. So they want someone to kill the child, do they? Anything rather than have her found alive? It's beginning to look to me as though they do. Unless Pamalam knew it was a hoax before she posted up the picture.

Jeezuz, there are times when I wish I worked for Scotland Yard. But then if I can work it out, so can they.

Jeezuz, there are times when I wish I worked for Scotland Yard. But then if I can work it out, so can they.

Absolutely, Sabot.

Unless Pamalam knew it was a hoax before she posted up the picture.

Exactly. Either-

1. She knew it was a hoax all along

or

2. She didn't know, but didn't care that she was endangering Madeleine McCann when she posted it to big herself up.

Such is their sick hate of the innocent child.

If the details were sent to Pamalam how did the Express get a hold of them?

Pamalam will deny she knew it was a hoax. So she must want The Abductor to kill Madeleine. What else would she expect him to do?

crazytony wrote:If the details were sent to Pamalam how did the Express get a hold of them?

Put that on your Blog, s'il tu plait.

crazytony wrote:If the details were sent to Pamalam how did the Express get a hold of them?

I can't make head nor tail of it, Tony. I do, however, smell very large hater rats.

Something smells about it, Bonny.

http://thehoundingofthemccans.blogspot.co.uk/2013/01/did-pamalam-hand-details-to-scotland.html

Why did she post that picture after the Yard had asked for it NOT to be published?

Why did she post emails containing so much personal information about a possible witness?

There are only two possible answers.

Either she did it to wreck what, for all she knew, was a genuine lead to Madeleine - and remember, she hung onto the emails for a week.

Or she knew all along it was a hoax. I will leave others to speculate on how she would know that.

Any sign of an explanation as to why pamalan not only sat on the emails for a week, but then saw fit to publish the name, email addie and phone number of a possible witness to the whereabouts of an abducted child?

Or she knew all along it was a hoax. I will leave others to speculate on how she would know that.

Now that's a tough one. NOT.

http://thehoundingofthemccans.blogspot.co.uk/2013/01/i-take-it-lawrence-is-goin-to.html

Pretty clumsy set-up, wasn't it?

bb1 wrote:Any sign of an explanation as to why pamalan not only sat on the emails for a week, but then saw fit to publish the name, email addie and phone number of a possible witness to the whereabouts of an abducted child?

That's despicable behavior by her.