BBC NEWS: BENNETT FOUND GUILTY

He should get it cut and slick it down.

A lot of men who are going grey do color their hair. I don't, I am here to proclaim loudly; his skin looks so grey, maybe that's why he does it? LL

Lamplighter wrote:A lot of men who are going grey do color their hair. I don't, I am here to proclaim loudly; his skin looks so grey, maybe that's why he does it? LL

Old men dying their hair reminds me of someone trying to recapture their youth.
Me, I'm just happy I have still got mine

No point in dyeing those horrible, straggly locks - a decent haircut would be more to the point.

That costs money, though....

Hilarious to see the Tone Worship Society is now reduced to clinging to the lunatic asylum which is yahoo news to give them hope - they're doing that sad thing where they copy their own comments and reassure themselves that Tick tock, the tide is turning.

While everyone laughs at them.

Not directly Bennett-related, but an excellent piece about hysterical reaction to high-profile crimes:

http://m.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/feb/22/pistorius-case-empty-vessel-prejudices

quote:

The most egregious of such "opportunities", in recent years, have been the Madeleine McCann abduction in Portugal and the Meredith Kercher murder in Italy. In both of those cases, the truth – that it was a crime of opportunity committed by a stranger – was rejected by many in favour of the idea of intimate, domestic horror, carried out by people so psychopathic, so quick-thinking and so coolly brilliant that they could commit an outrageous crime, behave in a flamboyantly self-publicising manner in its wake and yet, through sheer nerve, still expect to escape justice. The fact that both crimes were being investigated under criminal justice systems unfamiliar in detail to British audiences, and beyond the reach of straightforward considerations about contempt of court, made the manner in which they could be reported all the more "creative".

In the case of the McCanns, victim-blame was writ large. It was quickly decided that Kate and Gerry McCann weren't behaving in a manner befitting people whose child had been snatched from her bed to disappear without trace, as if reaction to something so appalling and strange could ever be "just right". In a widespread act of collective counter-prejudice, it was decided that it was precisely because the couple were middle-class, educated, respectable, and in vocational careers that one had to be careful not to be influenced by such thumpingly giant signs of their previous good character.

Even among people who refrained from the wildest speculations there was a feeling that "ordinary" people would have been charged with neglect. The McCanns and their friends had managed to persuade themselves that dining in the grounds of a holiday complex was like dining in their own garden. For this delusion of complete safety, this complacent ease with, and security about, their place in the world, they ought to be held to account.

In the Kercher case, similar prejudices were brought to bear. There was a reluctance to "fall for" the idea that middle-class US college students just didn't tend to be involved in acts of group sexual torture and murder. Further, Amanda Knox was a beautiful young woman. Contrary to evidence across the globe, and in virtually all walks of life, there is a perception that beautiful young women are to be feared and despised, because they are used to getting everything their own way.

Both the McCanns and Knox were accused of behaving oddly in the aftermath of the crimes, part of their "bizarre behaviour" being the exercise of their bodies, which was rejected as an understandable resort these people undertook in an attempt to still the manic, runaway exercise that had taken over their minds, and viewed instead as solipsism. Actually, their inability to comport themselves in a manner that would seem appropriate to the eyes they knew were watching them was far more likely to be an expression of guileless innocence than of calculated bluff. But the ability of humans to interpret matters to fit their prejudicial worldview is quite impressively well developed.

How many times do I have to write: the McCanns have not neglected their daughter, this is well proved through the laws of both countries involved in this case.

but, if you people want to talk about neglect, here it is a name, which neglected an innocent child, with the disgusting purpose of gain fame and fortune at the expenses of innocents, who decided to go to his home, following the moment while durimg dinner in the proximity of Praia da Luz, received a phonecal about the abduction, and insted of showing his fat, ugly, disgusting face, he went to his home, in the next day he woke up and started with his smears, lies, defamation, with the true purpose of hollywood celebrity style, through his books of lies, despicable behaviour, which was also previously repeated in the cipriano case by his friend paulo cristóvão, but, in the case of Madeleine McCann, gomçalo amaral gave a step larger than his leg could handle, amaral crashed and burned, the beast unleashed has turned against his creator.

that name is: gonçalo amaral.

Set up his own firm for two weeks then got a real job

Odd how there is little information about what it is Bennett actually does for a living.

bb1 wrote:Odd how there is little information about what it is Bennett actually does for a living.

That is really strange as it should be quite simple.

Good news all you sincerity-lovers! Bennett's TV interview (with transcript) is now here:

http://regretsandramblings.com/2013/02/23/bennett-after-sentencing-at-high-court/

What a seedy figure he cuts! Why doesn't he take his hands out of his pockets? And why does his shoulder keep twitching during the interview? Does that mean it knows he's not being sincere? Is there a Body Language Expert in the house?

LOTS of erms in that.........no comment about that from the pitchforkers? They made a big deal about Kate McCann and the others saying erm a lot when she was being interviewed

I bet a lot of them haven't seen it, Rhodes. Until tonight.

They really don't come out of it looking good, do they? They look like a bunch of unkempt, obsessed, stalkers.

Are we absolutely sure that pretendypete was ever a police officer? Because he seems to know nothing about criminal or civil law.

He isn't the trusted sleepermole, is he?

Might be. Have you noticed one of their prolific posters has been AWOL since Bennett went to court? Coincidence? NO.

Emu-silkcut-newperson-frost more than makes up for it.

bb1 wrote:Emu-silkcut-newperson-frost more than makes up for it.

Oh yes SilkCut ..... Do you think she has lowered herself recently and changed fags ??

Ah yes......she's had more names than anyone can remember.

You know, they must all have some kind of death wish, to repeat the same malicious falsehoods which got their Dear Leader a public dressing down by a High Court judge. Not that anyone greatly cares, but it is a bizarre spectacle. Real kamikaze stuff.

And why does his shoulder keep twitching during the interview?

Considering how grubby and unwashed he looks - fleas???? And his trousers are above his ankles, bit of exposure there, was he trying to plead poverty "M'Lud, I can't even afford a pair of trousers, these here shrunk when I put them in the washer." ?? LL

Staggering ignorance - not for the first time - from pretendy profilers Bushmeat and Trampstamp.

Last time I looked, the US judiciary thinks as little of people who commit contempt of court as does the UK judiciary.

Never mind, it's always good when they demonstrate how little they actually know about anything.

The judge said that Gerry and Kate McCann, who have not attended court, had suffered injury to their reputations and feelings and resorted to legal action not to punish Mr Bennett - but to put a stop to his repeated conduct.

This statement from judge Tugendhat doesn't say much for anyone's chances of winning a Libel Trial, least of all Mr. Bennett. Should anyone be foolish enough to continue spouting Libel against The McCanns.

Sabot, I don't think the forkers and hounders have actually READ the judgement - they seem curiously ignorant of its contents.

No use them spitting bile at Mike Gunnill, he played a minor roll in Bennett's woes.

The Bennett cult seem incapable of grasping that the Dear Leader was found guilty of committing contempt of court

THIRTEEN TIMES

If the list of charges hadn't been whittled down, Judge T. would still have been declaring

IN MY JUDGEMENT BREACH ELEVENTY NINE IS PROVED.

Judge Tugendhat was fully aware of the game Bennett was playing when he refused to repeat Bennett's disgusting allegations.

Now, I know the hounders and forkers are a bit, well, challenged but perhaps they could get some kind, educated, intelligent person to explain the High Court ruling against Bennett to them.

They might then grasp why they are all digging themselves into an ever-deeper hole.