Bennett already going back on promise he made on BBC Television

Yes Tony. Dropping them all in it. INNIT?

Just leave them to it. They've been warned, and warned, and warned, and still refuse to listen. So, just let them. And let's see if they are so keen to trust good old Tone in March 2014.

They've made their beds, let them lie in them.

Your right Bonny. We tried to warn them, so to the devil with them.
As they sow, so shall they reap.

Blimey, it's worse than we thought. What a turn up.

I don't care what happens to any of them, Sabot. How dare they insert their nasty, amateur selves into a crime involving an abducted child? Make them feel good, does it, trying to obstruct the REAL police?

I would be happy indeed if the courts finally bring an end to the filthy imaginings and the blind hatred which they seem to think they are entitled to inflict on the world. If they want to share their disgusting theories, then nothing's stopping them doing it on a closed fb group, where it won't be picked up and on the internet forever more.

That wouldn't suit them, though, would it? How many times have we seen them fantasising about having the power to distress Madeleine's brother and sister, convinced as they are that the twins will be impressed by their sick garbage?

You cannot tell me that normal, decent human beings think that way. Some of their 'Free Speach' makes my skin crawl, and wonder what kind of freak could invent it.

So no, I don't care if Bennett has handed over a list of 'supporters' - it will serve them right if he has.

Dear me. Are my eyes deceiving me, or has there been yet more censorship on Troofseeker Central?

bb1 wrote:Dear me. Are my eyes deceiving me, or has there been yet more censorship on Troofseeker Central?

They moved it to SSSSSSSSSSS, Bonny

Watching it reminds me of watching the dying days of 3A, the forum where truth ran screaming out the door as the paranoid hounders threw their weight around.

How's this for the hounders' legal understanding?

Re: Daily Star: Tony:- "The McCanns are powerless to stop others making the same allegations as him"
aiyoyo Yesterday at 2:37 pm

david_uk wrote:
Is it possible to write a book written by a large collection of forum members? I wonder if the Mccanns would still take 30 Plus people to court?!. Not that I would be any good at writing, I could however provide the cover and illustrations!


If it comes to that, we can ask simple questions and have this compiled into a long list as appendix to the book. I am sure more than 30 people can come up with at least one simple question for the mccanns.

Oh let's see......... it will depend on where this wondrous book is published.

Will a proper book publisher do it? Their response would be along the lines of

Will it be published on the internet? Oh, that is easy too.

I wonder if they can figure it out?

In the name....have they forgotten that their Dear Leader tried to wriggle out of responsibility for the Reasons, following the Rothley Stalking, by claiming it was actually written by 3A members?

Groundhog Day!

It sure is, Bonny.

more than 30 people

Oh, the mists are clearing...... a more accurate number of hounder members.

Here we are! A record of the whole thing!

http://justice4mccannfam.5forum.biz/t1772-bennett-tries-to-shift-blame-for-rothley-10-reasons-leaflet

Tony Bennett said...

Anonymous: "If care was taken not to mention the 3As in the leaflet, it is rather a pity then that Mr. Bennett dropped the 3As right in it by writing: 'The leaflet is being distributed widely across the country. It was effectively written by 3As members, and we compiled it'. in a post on the 3As. Or did he think nobody would notice?"

REPLY: Not so much 'dropping 3As in it', surely, rather more: 'giving credit where credit is due'.

The setting-up of 3As and its maintenance by Bren and others over nearly two years has been a stunning achievement and the site has attracted some wonderful posters who give generously of their time. I didn't want MF to take the credit when it was mostly 3As members who are NOT MF members that suggested the leaflet in the first place and then made the major contributions to it.

That is not to say that all or most of them would have supported the 'Rothley leaflet drop', maybe not. I think most of them would support its continued distribution though.

19 August 2009 13:48

Dear me, it's all over the internet!

http://www.madeleinefoundation.org.uk/PDFs/Madeleine%20Foundation%20MEMBERS%20Letter%20ONE%20Nov%202009.pdf

1 May 2009 - After extensive consultation with members of the ‘3 Arguidos’ forum,
we published our new leaflet

Nothing like spreading the blame, is there?

I seem to remember a poster called Tigger first suggested The Leaflet and or Book. Generally speaking, it was more or less decided on 3As that this could cause problems, so the idea was dropped. And then Bennett picked it up and got them all going again.

Oh yes, Sabot. Was that the Tigger who was friends with Sofa Cleese?

That's the one, Lily. I seem to recall she got cold feet? Not to be confused with the deeply unpleasant 'tigger' currently on 8r sites.

Thank goodness that they are two separate posters. The other Tigger was nice.

Yes, she didn't want to go ahead. She had a child or children who were autistic, if I remember, and co-wrote a book with Sofa?

Oh yes, something like that, Lily....certainly nothing like the lunatics and obsessives currently dominating the 8r mob.

Definitely different, Bonny.

Whether the 8r mob like it or not, this is almost the end of the road. I believe that this is why events are the way they now are.

As soon as Gonc has to cough up, there will be no point for the mob to continue.

: Questions for the McCanns
thedrawncurtain Today at 2:17 pm

Ive got a question for all of you.
The incredible 20 or so posters that use this forum.

Why do you not allow others to post.
Why are the remaining 2,500 members not posting.
Why do you ban so readily.
Why do you ridicule the posters whom have offered debate.
Why do you chastise anyone who does not support TB.
Why does TB say he does not agree with ECHR yet appears to have used it in his defence.
Why do you incessantly harp on about the minutiae of this case..Madeleine and Monsoon... GM and his left photographic arm.

Are you 20 or so posters in fear of losing your chatroom.
Isn't that what this forum has become?
Fancy a RECIPE?

The few sensible, intelligent posters that have offered some reasonable debate have been banned and jumped on with immediacy. You show the same behaviour to Blacksmith. You readily and speedily speculate on who is actually posting for real. Who their friends are. What their disguise is.......Why is this?

Do you not realise this influences the new posters THE OTHER WAY!
That, my God, if this is what the people who doubt are like, I'm outta here!

Show some respect to yourselves and answer my question and keep this post up on this thread because it is important to all those 'newbies' that you welcome so wholeheartedly, then ban within 24 hours.

Your forum does not appear to be squished with over 2000 members.

These members are banned members who have joined under new names yet are kept SILENT by YOU.

Oh dear, Jean and yoyo will have to rush in and call them ^^^^^ a TROLL!!!!!!!

Other-tigger gets there first:

Fancy a Recipe? Not half!
Yes, yes! I urgently need a recipe for a troll my cat has just caught. Do I steam it, roast it or just boil it?

( the reason the other 2000 members aren't posting is that they're all Serbo-Croat immigrants, they think this is a forum on British cooking

They don't want to insult Serbo-Croat immigrants too much, what with their Dear Leader being half Croat.

bb1 wrote:Other-tigger gets there first:

Fancy a Recipe? Not half!
Yes, yes! I urgently need a recipe for a troll my cat has just caught. Do I steam it, roast it or just boil it?

( the reason the other 2000 members aren't posting is that they're all Serbo-Croat immigrants, they think this is a forum on British cooking

They don't want to insult Serbo-Croat immigrants too much, what with their Dear Leader being half Croat.

Oh, Did that Jean really have to take her avatar down (with some others) and replace it with another because of copyright?

Oh, I missed that melodrama, Lily. She had a snake one for a few days, which many thought rather suitable.....

The TROLL!!!!!! has been banned now, predictably. Oddly, they don't seem too bothered about little things like emu/frost/cherry blossom have two very obvious accounts, but I suppose it's OK for 8rs to do things like that.

And they wonder why people laugh at their claims of 'over 2000 members' - any fule knowe it's more like a tenth of that, with even fewer active.

Yes, Bonny. She was Kirsten Dunst. Maybe she didn't want to be associated with the 8ters?

Oh, they don't worry about folks like emu. They will prostrate themselves to do anything to increase their "numbers".

Not that we could ever call them hypocrites.

lily wrote:Oh yes, Sabot. Was that the Tigger who was friends with Sofa Cleese?

That's the one, Lily. She actually got very upset by it all, and then bailed out because they were very rude to her. And then Mr. Bennett went charging in and made use of everything that she had advocated. So I suppose that you could blame her, if you wanted to.
That other Sofa disappeared around about then.