Bennett already going back on promise he made on BBC Television

bb1 wrote:Maybe Bennett himself is the result of some botched cloning experiment, and that's why so many people with the same obsessions as him, and the same 'tells' as him, keeping turning up on the site that is nothing to do with him?

Sounding exactly like him, too?

That's amazing as sources told me the same thing.

bb1 wrote:The truth has a habit of coming out, whether you like it or not
Khalgregar Yesterday at 7:44 pm

Hi, I'm new : )

Yes, of course you are.

PS - Ironic thread title.

Bennett should read this before his next court date:

'Don't speak like TV lawyers. Judges hate it': People representing themselves in court in wake of legal aid reforms given advice in new guide (Ally McBeal types not welcome)

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2302227/Legal-aid-reform-Dont-speak-like-TV-lawyers-Judges-hate-it.html#ixzz2PFAR7u53
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

There can be serious consequences if you deliberately lie or even bend the truth.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2302227/Legal-aid-reform-Dont-speak-like-TV-lawyers-Judges-hate-it.html#ixzz2PEYyYG00
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Oh dear. Bennett did that, didn't he?

A GUIDE TO COURTROOM ETIQUETTE
Resist the temptation to speak like lawyers on TV. Judges hate it.
Make sure you speak loudly, slowly and clearly.
Dress smartly and turn up early.
Make sure you know what to call the judge.
Be completely honest with the judge.
There can be serious consequences if you deliberately lie or even bend the truth.
Failed to follow the rules, didn't he? LL

I put it to you, LL, that he seems to have........

I just have this vision of Bennett strutting around intoning, I put it to you that.... in the finest Rumpole tradition. That was probably the high spot of his life, you know - pretending to be a QC in the High Court.

bb1 wrote:I just have this vision of Bennett strutting around intoning, I put it to you that.... in the finest Rumpole tradition. That was probably the high spot of his life, you know - pretending to be a QC in the High Court.

Oh yes. Especially because it was before one of the nation's best Judges.

bb1 wrote:I just have this vision of Bennett strutting around intoning, I put it to you that.... in the finest Rumpole tradition. That was probably the high spot of his life, you know - pretending to be a QC in the High Court.

And your vision was spot on, Bonny. Especially when "cross examining" the witnesses. I honestly do not know how MG managed to keep a straight face.

The number of times Tugendhut had to bring him back to heel........ "Mr Bennett, I have told you before, these questions about the case should be addressed to Ms Page".

Isn't Bennett overdue to make a statement about the court costs? I seem to recall that was supposed to have been settled by now?

Must have been too busy knitting himself yet another sock to have time to post about the costs.

According to pretendypete, the supposed ex-policeman:

Innocent people and true victims do not need legal teams.

Really? What about all the innocent people who have ended up dead/jailed for life because of miscarriages of justice?

I wish these creatures would take themselves off to some police state to live, as they so admire Fascist thuggery.

The hounders have got another of those disgusting threads going, where they discuss Madeleine McCann, and other children, as if they were pieces of meat.....

And make remarks like this:

Re: Video Analysis of Tennis Court photo
Lance De Boils Today at 8:45 pm

Weird. When I look at that pic through squinted eyes, the whole head, starting at a line on the neck, looks like it's been pasted on. And not in quite the right position.


Re: Video Analysis of Tennis Court photo
Châtelaine Today

Unless the poor little mite was a hunchback ...

======

And then they wonder why words like VILE and SICK are used to describe them....

Perverted scum.

Again from hounder central, gossip mongering is in force on the subject of 'Medical Errors and Medical Narcissism'.


So before she left the apartment she put medicines inside a clasped bag, which means they were not in the bag before, so had someone had to take a Nurofen, or a Losec. There wasn't mention of a pain or acidity so what were the drugs doing out of the bag. The bag was then put into the wardrobe, so again they were not there before. Why has she told us this?

She hasn't told them anything. It is frankly none of the gossipers business.

Did we sleep through their medical graduations?

Re: 'Medical Errors and Medical Narcissism, a study
PeterMac Today at 8:05 am

Khalgregar wrote:

If Kate had suspected that an abductor had sedated the twins with an unknown substance - which she says in her book - she would surely have immediately taken them to a hospital. She would only have not done this if she was 100% sure what sedatives were in her children's bloodstreams, and the only way that that is possible is if she sedated them herself.

Quite. And there is no substance and no procedure which can be administered to three children within one minute and 20 seconds and knock them all out for 10 hours and allow two of them then to wake and display no side effects.
It is therefore a logical conclusion to draw that both Kate and Fiona knew, knew, exactly what had been administered, in what dose, and when, and that the non-response of the children was therefore perfectly OK, and not a matter of concern. As it clearly wasn't.
IF they had really suspected sedation by an intruder, they put themselves in the frame for the most gross professional negligence, for which they should both be struck off the register.

Kate is a qualified anaesthetist in the company of other doctors.

What are that lot on about? As I said, did we sleep through their graduations?

I have to ask. Do they all have mental health issues? They can't be drunk already, but they are making up total, utter bullsh*t.

And what do the ghoulish, sick fantasies they are inventing say about what goes on in THEIR heads 24/7?

Re: Why does Gerry smirk so much and so often.
No Fate Worse Than De'Ath on Wed Apr 10, 2013 12:34 pm

I know someone who checked with Land Registry in January this year and Rothley Towers was still subject to a mortgage then.

And then they wonder why they get called HATERS. Just how sick do you have to be to shove your pitchforking nose into other people's private lives?

How would TROLL!!!!!! expert Jean like it if someone snooped on her finances? And why is she trying to hide under another nic? Isn't that, well, TROLLING?

Unbelieveable! Some hounder has posted a copy of Margaret Thatcher's death certificate and now they're all discussing that, and inventing 'cover-ups'.

Can anyone explain, just what is it they think they are proving with this sick, ghoulish conduct?

They probably think they are super sleuths who can do what others cannot?

Maybe they should put their sleuthing skills to good use and find out what has become of Head Hounder? He's conspicuous by his absence these days; he doesn't even seem to be trolling Justice calling himself Freudian Slip, or anything.

Maybe he's busy giving those lovely blue box files he got from Carter Ruck a springclean?

Oh dear, oh dear.

A question. Why is there a Ms Marbles on hellhole? Has she been cloned?

I expect he is writing one of his 10,000 word rants. Or writing post for other people.

lily wrote:A question. Why is there a Ms Marbles on hellhole? Has she been cloned?

Really? What a cheek.