Times - clues hidden for five years, (according to convicted conman)

IMO, the very fact that there was no follow-up 'investigation' says it all, Tony. Indeed, the following day's piece in the Times, by another reporter, made it clear there were rather serious errors in the original piece.

And that is a very good find - Exton had to know, which makes an even bigger nonsense of the 'investigation'.

Vera Steinke
Why does SY keep so silent concering the fact that critical evidences were suppressed for 5 years?

Because they weren't 'suppressed' - and I do wish the ST hadn't taught them to spell that, they've been hissing 'suppressed' like Gollum and his Precioussssss ever since.

The PJ had had them for years but didn't use them because the PJ don't use efits.

Instead of hissing supresssssssed continually, why aren't they demanding to know why the Great Co-Ordinator:

1. Failed to check the night creche records thereby sending everyone in the wrong direction for years?

2. Failed to check former OC employees with unsavoury habits?

3. Failed to check the phone records of anyone except the McCanns and their friends?

4. Failed to search derelict buildings properly?

Why?   They cannot face their precious Big Rock as being seen to have been grossly incompetent?