More Bennett Blah Blah Blah

Ali has bravely risked her eyesight and posted the whole thing at:

http://stopthemyths.prophpbb.com/post33068.html#p33068

MORE BLAH BLAH BLAH FROM BENNETT

I can't be ar@ed.

Cut to the chase; Scotland Yard have told him and the other prodnoses to Go Forth And Multiply. Who saw that coming?

EXTENT OF SEARCHES TO LOCATE INFORMATION

To locate the information relevant to your request searches were conducted within the Specialist Crime Directorate - Homicide and Serious Crime Command.

RESULT OF SEARCHES

The searches located information relevant to your request.

DECISION

I have today decided to:

Answer questions 5, 6 , 7, 10 and 11 in full

To refuse questions 8 and 9 by virtue of section 8 of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (The Act) as an invalid request.

To exempt questions 1, 2, 3 and 4 by virtue of section 30 (1)(a)(b)(c) and section 31(1)(a)(b)(c) of the Act.

Please see the legal annex for the sections of the Act referred to in this email.

REASONS FOR DECISION

The following questions have been responded to in full:

At question 5 you asked: On 14 May 2011, the Daily Telegraph said that "Scotland Yard's new investigation is being overseen by Commander Simon Foy, one of the force's most experienced detectives". Please either confirm that, or provide information as to who is in overall command of this Review.

At Question 6 you asked: On 15 May 2011, the Daily Record said that " Scotland Yard said Detective Chief Inspector Andy Redwood, from the Homicide and Serious Crime Command, would be the senior investigating officer in the case". Please either confirm that, or provide information as to who is the senior investigating officer in the case.

At question 7 you asked: On 15 May 2011, the Independent on Sunday said that "Mr. Redwood will report to Detective Chief Superintendent Hamish Campbell, Homicide and Serious Crimes Command (HSCC), operational command unit commander." Please either confirm that, or provide information as to who is the person in overall charge of the HSCC".

The MPS response is: The senior officer with oversight of the review is Commander Simon Foy. Detective Chief Inspector (DCI) Andy Redwood is the Senior Investigating Officer. DCI Redwood reports to Detective Chief Superintendent Hamish Campbell.

At question 10 you asked: Does the Madeleine McCann Review Team have a deadline for completing its review? If so, when is it?

The MPS response is: The review team does not have a deadline for the completion of its review.

At question 11 you asked: Does the Madeleine McCann Review Team have a budget? If so, what is it? Do the funds allocated to this Review Team come from the Home Office or from the Metropolitan Police Authority?

The MPS response is: The MPS has allocated a team to deal with this and the Home Office have agreed to reimburse this cost. This is reviewed on a quarterly basis.

The following questions have been refused on the grounds that they do not constitute a valid request under the Act:

At question 8 you asked: On 20 and 22 July 2011, an officer from the Intelligence Section of the Madeleine McCann Team, Sam, Pay No. 220629, stated that the policy of the Team was not to answer any correspondence. Please state whether or not this is the case.

At question 9 you asked: Please state whether, if evidence or other information is sent to the Madeleine McCann Review Team, any acknowledgement of the receipt of that information will be given.

The MPS response is: I have decided to refuse access to the information you have requested under the provisions of Section 8(2)(a)(b)(c) of the Act.

A request under the Act is required by statute to be legible and capable of being used for subsequent reference. After careful consideration, I have decided that your request does not meet this requirement as I am unable to ascertain what recorded information you have requested, as defined by Section 8(2)(c).To enable us to meet your request could you please resubmit your application in accordance with the above requirements. If for any reason you are unable to do so, please contact me for assistance or seek assistance from any other available source.


Naturally, Bennett is not best pleased, and is appealling.

NOT TO ME HE ISN'T!! BOOM BOOM!!

Look, Bennett, it is none of your business; very little is. Stop trying to interfere with police efforts to find a missing child and go and complain about your local refuse collections or something; do something useful for once.

TB, do us all a favour: why don´t shove up your *** all your bullshit?

Drop a Dead Donkey, might suffice.

It beggars belief that Bennett thinks Scotland Yard are going to tell him, or any of the other haters, anything. The police, like the Home Office, are fully aware of what they get up to.

Sooner they realise they are the Bad Guys, and stop wasting taxpayers' money, the better.

zampos Anthony Bennett
@Qaudrille Thanks 4 #McCann tweets. Yes, Jon Rees is key man (Dan Morgan murder). We should talk 1-2-1 away from twitter, you have my e-mail
3 hours ago

You just do that thing, Bennett.

By the way, you do know that Quadrille is also Steelmagnolia and a slew of hatebloggers - but mainly Ironside, notorious for being a bloke who pretended to be a woman with cancer?
No?
Don't take our word for it - go and ask such leading lights of the hate movement as Beachy, Jeanne d' Arc and Morais.

Bennett is truely an imbecile. He somehow thinks this court judgement is going to save his sorry hide:

http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKSC/2010/53.html

Look at the date, moron:

JUDGMENT GIVEN ON
1 December 2010

It is a spat between an obscure bunch of musicians which should never have come to court.

It pales into insignificance beside accusing innocent people of involvement in their missing child's death, of inventing filthy stories about public figures, harrassing other public figures by hiding in their garden....the whole endless list of Bennett's insanities.

Oh well, who cares? He can find out for himself

Even Viv can see why it is totally irrelevant to what Bennett has done:

anotherviv Viv
@
@zampos But u cant now defend what 2 yrs ago u signed a crt order not to do, can u! Try applying the law #mccann
3 hours ago

bb1 wrote:Even Viv can see why it is totally irrelevant to what Bennett has done:

anotherviv Viv
@
@zampos But u cant now defend what 2 yrs ago u signed a crt order not to do, can u! Try applying the law #mccann
3 hours ago

He gave an undertaking to the courts; that issue has not changed. Bennett has breached the undertaking; thereby proving his word of honor cannot be trusted.
He is going to be forced to suffer the consequences.
Why, can't he understand this?

I don't think he wants to understand that, Tony. He's desperately trying to get out of the serious legal mess he has made for himself.

So sad. Too bad.

lily wrote:I don't think he wants to understand that, Tony. He's desperately trying to get out of the serious legal mess he has made for himself.

So sad. Too bad.

I don't see how he is going to get out of this one, lily.

Tony, I sure as hell can't figure a way out either. Shame innit.....

lily wrote:Tony, I sure as hell can't figure a way out either. Shame innit.....

zampos Anthony Bennett
@anotherviv Yes I signed a Court underaking 4 the #McCann s, but as I said then, things change, a lot more evidence & secrets are coming out

No, more 'evidence' and secrets' are not coming out. Bennett and others are making up total sh*t about innocent people, for which they can all answer in court.

bb1 wrote:zampos Anthony Bennett
@anotherviv Yes I signed a Court underaking 4 the #McCann s, but as I said then, things change, a lot more evidence & secrets are coming out

No, more 'evidence' and secrets' are not coming out. Bennett and others are making up total sh*t about innocent people, for which they can all answer in court.

Can someone sneak in there and Tweet? This is going to be too good to miss.

anotherviv Viv
Tony, court order is final unless you appeal it in time which u did not so no going back can PM me if u want look up issue estoppel

Lord spare us, the pretendy solicitor is now advising the, er, former solicitor...

Wish I tweeted but I don't Sabot. Hopefully someone will.

What does he think a legal undertaking is, exactly? Maybe they should do a new one to suit him?

anotherviv Viv
@
@bischofield He obtained legal advice, courts will not revisit old judgments finality is always required, v bad situation! #mccann

Just for once, she's right.

Bennett made a solemn oath to the representatives of Her Majesty, in the persons of the officers of the High Court.

Bennett repeatedly broke his solemn oath to the representatives of Her Majesty.

Bennett is a scoundrel, cad and general low-class bounder, who would be blackballed from any club for that, drummed out of any regiment, dishonourably discharged from Her Majesty's forces.

Bennett is Friar Tucked.

He's never been in The Army, has he? They wouldn't have him in The Navy.

In other words, when he signed the undertakings, he never intended to stick to them. I see. I'm sure the judge will be impressed with him.

He probably signed it with his fingers crossed behind his back. That makes it okay to tell whoppers, you see,

Hmm. Lrts look at this for a moment. A high court undertaking is freely entered into. It not the same as a court order imposed on you as a result of a judgement.

How can one appeal an undertaking that you yourself have entered into of your own free will?

He gave the undertaking to stop the McCanns taking him to the cleaners. The lawyers he engaged told him he had no chance, that the McCanns would win, and they might be able to provide some mitigation....

Bennett seems to think he can say to the court "that undertaking? er - well - I didn't really mean it so er if it's all the same to you - I think I will take it back. OK? Anyway - I had my fingers croissed when I signed it so it dosen't count,
_______

A parallel could be a marriage vow. Freely entered into. If you break the vow, you had better have a pretty understanding spouse. I would say that thus fas the McCanns have been like an understanding spouse. Who has now decided to get the rolling pin out....

What an imbecile!

zampos Anthony Bennett
@anotherviv - Undertakings may be given, but things change. Read Spiller v Joseph here: jillhavern.forumotion.net/t3535-spiller-… See what I mean? #McCann #libel

A solemn oath is a solemn oath is a solemn oath. It has nothing whatsoever to do with band members exchanging insults.

He's in total denial, isn't he?

Oh My God. He's not going to spout that at The Judge, is he? Count down for Contempt of Court.

On the subject of Bennett trying to interfere with a police investigation, harrass witnesses, etc:

http://regretsandramblings.com/2011/09/12/turning-a-blind-eye/

One very good point - it's hardly an advertisement for co-operating with the Portuguese police, is it?

Tell us what you saw and we will make sure your statement, name, address, phone number and other personal details are all over the internet so lunatics can stalk your family.

Bennett is pestering the police IN PERSON, it would seem...

Re: SY review team
Get 'em Gonçalo Today at 1:14 pm

Tony is having a meeting with NSY to discuss the additional evidence he's hand delivering to them so he should be able to let you have a contact email address for 'Operation Grange' in due course.

Oh, goodie, can't wait to see him waffling his way out of being told, DON'T CALL US, WE'LL CALL YOU!