BENNETT BOOTS BIRCH

Sabot wrote:
Whoops, sorry. I think I meant Testicles. My bad.

You very bad, I flinch! LL

Do you suppose Bennett had secretly been watching Big Brother, when he decided to evict Birch?

Lamplighter wrote:

Sabot wrote:
Whoops, sorry. I think I meant Testicles. My bad.

You very bad, I flinch! LL

I don't know why, LL. I wouldn't mind cooking Bennett's testicles. But I wouldn't want to eat them.

bb1 wrote:Do you suppose Bennett had secretly been watching Big Brother, when he decided to evict Birch?

I don't know, Bonny, but it was very ill thought out. Especially as Bennett admitted to with holding this Evidence, and it was this Evidence, as Sharoni so kindly confirmed. And nowhere in that email does it say that The Police had been informed, although Sharoni tried to imply that they had.

Ooh, I wonder if Scotland Yard have been in touch with Bennett, demanding to see said email?

Oh yes, that's a thought....and I see there's yet another row going on on haverns.

This time, the cause is that Cristobell person - no, NOT THE RESPECTED ADMIN OF J4. I haven't bothered reading said blog, I am not actually greatly interested in the opinions of forkers, hounders, ghouls and haters.

Anyway, this person is being taken to task by the Hounders for failure to hate the McCanns sufficiently, and said,

"My views pretty much depend on how much I have had to drink. "

Which hasn't gone down well at all.



You say the above and want a topic with the title" rational discourse"? Are you having a laugh?
I would have enjoyed a vigorous debate with you over issues where members in many instances have entrenched views, the same way that I wish some hardened pro abduction- ers would come and debate sensibly.
However, because of the above quote, I will not be engaging in any further discussion. To say your alcohol levels dictate your opinions about such a serious matter is extremely offensive imo, why don't you limit your time on here to when you are not partially inebriated, then you might find your opinions don't sway in the wind.




Considering many of the haters are clearly under the influence of something when they tweet and post - that's rich.

And so is deluding yourself that anyone is going to 'debate' with the likes of them.

You are an enthusiastic member of an internet lynch mob, or you aren't. It's as simple as that. We'd go out of our way to avoid low-lives like that in real life, so who wants to have anything to do with them on the internet?

They're pariahs, and they really ought to get used to the idea.

Oh my goodness, another one IN IT

Oh, this one's got Official Endorsement, too:

: Madeleine McCann - A Rational Discourse - new blog
candyfloss Today

Let's put it this way, if I wrote a book I would sure as hell tell people about it here. Why wouldn't I? Just ask yourselves if you would do the same........ wouldn't you give it a plug and maybe even want to discuss it and have opinions on it?

Tony advertises his work here or used to, until forced otherwise by shh you know who. Pat Brown advertised her book here. We all advertise people's blogs on a daily basis with links and copy and pastes. What is all the fuss about.

==========

Search me.

However, on last night's showing, Bennett should descend, Deus ex Machina, at midnight, wag his finger at this latest Star Turn, then whoosh yet another embarrassing thread.

crazytony wrote:Oh my goodness, another one IN IT

I think it is very kind of the forkers and hounders to provide such high-class entertainment on yet ANOTHER rain-sodden summer's day in the UK, Tony.

I think I've rattled my brain. I spend so much time shaking my head in utter amazement these days. Debate with them? We tried that and got fed up with being abused and banned. I never insulted anyone on that Site, but got whooshed in The Big Cull, just for being Pro McCann. Tis no wonder I'm a bit more vociferous these days.
But never mind, they are doing a grand job on themselves. That's why Bennett is due in Court.

How's this for toeing the party line? It's on MM, but that Jean person appears to have been sent over to spread the Official Version:

e: Stephen Birch CAPETALK RADIO - transcript
Not Born Yesterday Today

It wasn't definitely proved that he was a wind-up merchant but he and a sidekick who joined in were causing such ructions that the topic was removed and the two of them banned. They certainly had read the trolls' handbook of how to disrupt a forum!

Nothing like rewriting history, is there? Birch and his sidekick were given the seal of approval by Havern-Admin



only to be booted out by Bennett-supposedly not Admin.

And he wasn't kicked out for trolling, he was kicked out for making them all look like idiots....



How she has the nerve to call anyone a troll is beyond me.

Dear Mr Birch, I've been away from this forum for a while and have now read this thread - and also clicked on to YouTube to view your 3-minute video.

See? Bennett not-Admin knew he was the real Birch.

So who banned Mr. Birch if it wasn't Bennett Not Admin? Admin Admin thought he should stay.
Can someone tell me what is going on? Who exactly is Admin.

I have no intentions of experimenting with Testblinkinsock to find out - I might break something - but I should think it's perfectly possible to give one VERY SPECIAL member admin powers, without it being apparent, Sabot?

Or maybe Admin Admin simply gives Bennett her password? Dunno.

Remember, he was proudly boasting about the site stats this morning - including ones members aren't supposed to have access to.

That thread was hastily removed from public view, too.

Don't ask me exactly what they are playing at, beyond they are, as usual, not being honest.

I don't think lack of honesty is their only problem. They seem to be somewhat lacking in brain matter as well. Their clangers are never ending classics.

Give them a bit longer, Sabot, and no doubt they will have found a way of blaming the McCanns for what they themselves have caused.

You would have thought it was a bit of a clue that Birch was a waste of space when Duarte Levy came out of hiding to back him, but no, they just ploughed on.

Ah well.

bb1 wrote:How's this for toeing the party line? It's on MM, but that Jean person appears to have been sent over to spread the Official Version:

Is that the same person who posted this today?



"as I was once involved with a religious cult, though mind control rather than money was the focal point."

The claims these people make about their lives are quite revealing.

Oh, I missed that one, Greenink. Yes, aren't they peculiar?

I think they all hate each other more than they hate us or The McCanns. They're all fighting all of the time to be Top Dog. They all want to crack The Case, but before they can do that there has to be a Case. So they make it up as they go along.

And Birch was manna from Heaven to them. The fact that he was just another forker idiot, who had swiped his 'research' from the other SA idiots who hung around Stevo's site, didn't matter.

He spoke their language! He demanded to be listened to! He demanded the McCanns do his bidding! He claimed to have Cracked the Case! He was all over the Portuguese press, issuing demands!

What was there not to like, in their eyes?

And when, as always, he turned out to be just another chancer, they had to start rewriting history - as they are doing now.

Oh Lord, spare us! Now they are all off on Important Discussions and Research because some hounder claims some bloke in a pub just happened to know Secret Stuff and it just happened to come up in the course of conversation. Yeah, right, happens all the time.

I feel a pork pie is a very fitting avatar for the guilty party.

Don't they know how utterly ridiculous they sound. I would think they are all about 15 if I didn't know better. Although I have to say I was shocked when I found out just how old some of them are. It has to be genetic you know. They are probably all related.

Anyone normal would be embarrassed, but not them. They are now eagerly abusing their membership of ancestry sites to stalk the parents and grandparents of total strangers to find imaginary 'connections'.

There's something wrong with them, normal people don't behave like this.

You´re right bb1,

but of course they are not embarrassed, that´s the kind of fuel their insane brains consume.

Forker:

I don't think it was him as the language and spelling was limited. Wouldn't surprise me if it was trolls trying to discredit him so we all ignore what he says he found. I really have no idea if what he thinks he found is true or not but I don't believe it was the same person on the forum.

Just as predicted, they are thrashing around trying to find other people to blame for the debacle they themselves caused.

I guess they are 'forgetting' the bit when Official Admin and Not-Admin both confirmed that was Birch on haverns?

This happens every time. They find a new saviour. Admin confirms they are the real deal. The entire Forum falls about in glorious sychophantation. The saviour goes off message somewhat, normally due to ignorance. The forumites get shirty. The saviour gets shirty. The forumites rip them to pieces with increasing rudeness and abuse. The Forumites call them a WUM. The WUM gets banned. The WUM sinks into oblivion. The forumites blame The McCanns. Voila.

Having another one of my Can't Sleep episodes due to amazement and incomprehension trying to work it all out and having nightmares in the process.