Re: 'Profiler' Brown CR-d?

**crazytony** Wed Jul 27, 2011 3:34 pm

The woman is a walking Cluster Fluck! mad

**bb1** Wed Jul 27, 2011 3:35 pm

Lord knows who she thought she was impressing with this latest episode, Tony - another one playing to the gallery.

**crazytony** Wed Jul 27, 2011 3:37 pm

bb1 wrote:Lord knows who she thought she was impressing with this latest episode, Tony - another one playing to the gallery.

Well, it is wearing a bit thin and, it is now time for her to bow out!
Stupid Bovine mad

**Sabot** Wed Jul 27, 2011 3:38 pm

crazytony wrote:The woman is a walking Cluster Fluck!

Hardly. No one would fancy that, let alone a gang bang.

**Sabot** Wed Jul 27, 2011 3:46 pm

Isn't it lovely. All of these big mouthed, blonde haired tarts are being made to look like money grabbing, ignorant morons.

Trial by Media and Opinion Poll have failed miserably, thank God.

Bye bye Nancy Grace, Pat Brown and Tony Bennett. You all have lost it.

Pity about Bennett's hair. He's lost that as well.

**crazytony** Wed Jul 27, 2011 4:25 pm

Indeed it does mrst.

**bb1** Wed Jul 27, 2011 4:27 pm

[quote="mrs trellis"]

bb1 wrote:OMG!! By the wonders of googletranslate:

http://www.amazon.de/BANNED-Disappearance-Madeleine-royalties-ebook/dp/B005EOAWJ6/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1311750420&sr=8-1[/quote

Here's a thing.

Brown is on twitter. telling the faithfull that she made it clear that anyone ordering from the Amazon.de site would only get one page for their 99cents.

Well I know I am a bit thick, but doesnt that above say that you will get the whole book?

She's contradicting herself - first it is a 'sample download', then it is the entire book......

**bb1** Wed Jul 27, 2011 4:38 pm

Oh wait, that is a google translation.....but even google doesn't usually get things as wrong as THAT..
Dunno?

**bb1** Wed Jul 27, 2011 4:46 pm

I just don't know, mrs trellis - thing is, native German speakers thought it was the whole book, too. Anyway, looks like it is toast, if this is to be believed:

Halcyon says:
A. Brewer

I just received a private message from Pat with regard to her situation. She is not particularly confident of having her e-book reinstated on Amazon, although she will continue to pressure them to provide a full explanation for their actions which, as you know, appear to be motivated by a complaint from Carter-Ruck.

Although she has asked that I don't divulge absolutely everything that she said, I think I am on safe ground in telling you that she has alternate plans for electronic distribution of her work, which may even ultimately include making it freely available, as I get the impression that the principle has now become more important than monetary gain, and she is keen to reach the widest possible readership.

Interesting times...
----------

Halcyon says:
Further to my last, here is the letter that Pat received from Amazon...

Dear Pat,
...
We have received a notice of defamation from Carter-Ruck Solicitors that says the content of Profile of the Disappearance of Madeleine McCann (UPDATED) B0055WYVCQ, contains defamatory statements regarding their clients, Gerry and Kate McCann.

Because we have no method of determining whether the content supplied to us is defamatory, we have removed the title from sale and will not reinstate it unless we receive confirmation from both parties that this matter has been resolved.

Carter-Ruck can be reached at:
6 St Andrew Street
London EC4A 3AE

T 020 7353 5005

Best regards,

Robert F.

Oh, trust me, Robert F., it's defamatory - even in the US, a HUGE defamation action would be justified by that farrago of lies and nonsense..

**bb1** Wed Jul 27, 2011 4:50 pm

Criminal Profiler Pat Brown ‎::laughs::Not to worry....I knew they would pull this quickly in spite of the fact there was nothing libelous in it.

So, saying the McCanns' smuggled their daughter's corpse through UK customs was easy because the UK has a huge trade in smuggled meat wasn't libellous?

OKAYYYYYYYY.....

**crazytony** Wed Jul 27, 2011 4:53 pm

Yes, it is indeed defamatory, even by our standards. We are pretty liberal when it comes to things like this but, she has crossed the line this time.

**crazytony** Wed Jul 27, 2011 4:56 pm

It would appear so too are Amazon. Brown's book must be bad if this is allowed and hers isn't.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/40112145/ns/technology_and_science-tech_and_gadgets/t/amazon-defends-pedophiles-guide/

**bb1** Wed Jul 27, 2011 5:03 pm

I remember that row, Tony.
She hasn't a leg to stand on - she's used Stevo as a reference, for goodness' sake rofl

**Sabot** Wed Jul 27, 2011 5:09 pm

Oh, come on now. She only needs to have a quick chat with Carter Ruck and everything will be solved. She is on the side of The McCanns, after all. Isn't she?

**crazytony** Wed Jul 27, 2011 5:15 pm

Sabot wrote:
Oh, come on now. She only needs to have a quick chat with Carter Ruck and everything will be solved. She is on the side of The McCanns, after all. Isn't she?

If that's her on their side, I'd hate to see what she's like as an enemy.

**bb1** Wed Jul 27, 2011 5:16 pm

Nooo, no-one so wholesome, Jayelles.

It's George Galloway, another legend in his own lunchtime.

**Lamplighter** Wed Jul 27, 2011 6:25 pm

Profiler PAT BROWN
Profile of the Disappearance of Madeleine McCann NOW ON SALE at the online Barnes and Noble store! http://tinyurl.com/3f649n9 #McCann

**Sabot** Wed Jul 27, 2011 6:48 pm

crazytony wrote:
Sabot wrote:
Oh, come on now. She only needs to have a quick chat with Carter Ruck and everything will be solved. She is on the side of The McCanns, after all. Isn't she?
If that's her on their side, I'd hate to see what she's like as an enemy.

She did a really good job for Casey Anthony. Her and a couple of others. Fortunately The Jury weren't that stupid. People like her just haven't sussed that you can't try by Opinion Poll.

She can only fade into oblivion, eventually. Because she is thick. And nasty with it.

**crazytony** Wed Jul 27, 2011 6:56 pm

Sabot wrote:
crazytony wrote:
Sabot wrote:
Oh, come on now. She only needs to have a quick chat with Carter Ruck and everything will be solved. She is on the side of The McCanns, after all. Isn't she?
If that's her on their side, I'd hate to see what she's like as an enemy.

She did a really good job for Casey Anthony. Her and a couple of others. Fortunately The Jury weren't that stupid. People like her just haven't sussed that you can't try by Opinion Poll.

She can only fade into oblivion, eventually. Because she is thick. And nasty with it.

A fair number of folks got that one wrong too. But, for someone who is supposed to be up on the law, she should have known better. The evidence delivered by the Prosecutor was vague and full of innuendos, any lay person could see that.

**Sabot** Wed Jul 27, 2011 7:00 pm

Jayelles wrote:
Sabot wrote:
Oh, come on now. She only needs to have a quick chat with Carter Ruck and everything will be solved. She is on the side of The McCanns, after all. Isn't she?

I'd bet money that if the McCanns "hired" her, she'd jump sides in a flash. All she really wants is to make a name for herself (as well as $$$$s for designer running shoes and saris).

Well, we all know that Bennett wanted to be hired by The McCanns. So he could write a book about it. It was perfect for him because he hates The Police in any shape or form.
He didn't suddenly decide that an obviously bent Portuguese Copper was the way to go.
Bennett was pissed off because The McCanns were dubious about him. And who wouldn't have been since Bennett is obviously mad.

**bb1** Wed Jul 27, 2011 7:03 pm

People like her just haven't sussed that you can't try by Opinion Poll.

IMO, that is exactly what these people would like to do - they really are like throwbacks to lynch mobs.

**crazytony** Wed Jul 27, 2011 7:12 pm

bb1 wrote:People like her just haven't sussed that you can't try by Opinion Poll.

IMO, that is exactly what these people would like to do - they really are like throwbacks to lynch mobs.

Bennett reminds me of Sheriff George Corwin and the Salem Witch Trials. He, didn't care if the accused were guilty or not as long as he got what he wanted. Recognition and their lands.

**crazytony** Wed Jul 27, 2011 7:29 pm

http://thehoundingofthemccans.blogspot.com/

**Sabot** Wed Jul 27, 2011 7:36 pm

crazytony wrote:
Sabot wrote:
crazytony wrote:
Sabot wrote:
Oh, come on now. She only needs to have a quick chat with Carter Ruck and everything will be solved. She is on the side of The McCanns, after all. Isn't she?
If that's her on their side, I'd hate to see what she's like as an enemy.

She did a really good job for Casey Anthony. Her and a couple of others. Fortunately The Jury weren't that stupid. People like her just haven't sussed that you can't try by Opinion Poll.

She can only fade into oblivion, eventually. Because she is thick. And nasty with it.
A fair number of folks got that one wrong too. But, for someone who is supposed to be up on the law, she should have known better. The evidence delivered by the Prosecutor was vague and full of innuendos, any lay person could see that.

I honestly have no great desire to knock American Law, Tony. But I watched that trial in a state of total horror. I just don't understand at what point American Law separated from English Law, from whence it came. I don't understand The Circus.

My opinion of Casey Anthony is by the by. Not once did The Prosecutor prove to me that she killed that child deliberately, much as I might have wanted them to, but then I never thought that she did.

I am not in the least bit interested in how much money Casey might make. It is none of my business, and not in the least bit illegal.

Better by far that America shuts the mouths of the likes of Nancy Grace and Pat Brown. They make me feel sick to my stomach.

**bb1** Wed Jul 27, 2011 8:01 pm

'Profiler' Brown CR-d? - Page 3 Egyptmanwalk

Sponsored content