BENNETT IS BONKERS - THE NEVER-ENDING STORY

Sabot wrote:

lily wrote:

Sabot wrote:

lily wrote:

I think he said he found it on a US forum or something. Definitely in the US according to him.

Heaven knows what he was googling.

Something vile, obviously, Lily. You don't find that sort of thing by accident.

You most certainly don't, do you?

It is utterly revolting that Anthony Bennett should go searching The Internet for such depravities in the first place, Lily. Let alone posting them upon Forums.
It is not against The Law, and would only be of any interest to people who indulge in this kind of thing. If in fact they do. Or is it all in his mind? It sounds a bit impossible to me.

As can be seen in my post, if the police found Tony Bennett had visited porn sites containing children, he can be put on the sex offenders register.

Not Pete Townsend LL

Actor convicted over child porn

Chris Langham had pleaded not guilty to all the charges
Actor Chris Langham has been found guilty of downloading child porn.
Langham, of Golford, Kent, said he was only studying the porn as research for a television drama - but he was convicted at Maidstone Crown Court.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/kent/6928288.stm

Lamplighter wrote:Not Pete Townsend LL

Actor convicted over child porn

Chris Langham had pleaded not guilty to all the charges
Actor Chris Langham has been found guilty of downloading child porn.
Langham, of Golford, Kent, said he was only studying the porn as research for a television drama - but he was convicted at Maidstone Crown Court.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/kent/6928288.stm

That is one sick SOB

Well, he isn't an actor and he isn't a superstar guitarist. He's just your everyday hardcore hounder forker.

I don't want to really go down this path but does he find actual crimes to fit in with his perversions, so he can use that as cover? I mean, if his computer(s) were to be searched? IMO.

Maybe they are just coincidences........ I dunno, he's just so weird.

crazytony wrote:

Lamplighter wrote:Not Pete Townsend LL

Actor convicted over child porn

Chris Langham had pleaded not guilty to all the charges
Actor Chris Langham has been found guilty of downloading child porn.
Langham, of Golford, Kent, said he was only studying the porn as research for a television drama - but he was convicted at Maidstone Crown Court.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/kent/6928288.stm

That is one sick SOB

Debatable, Tony. But he was convicted.

He must go looking for these things, Lily - no-one else ever stumbles across them by 'accident'.

And isn't it interesting that apparently, he was unable to prove his allegations about Mr Smethurst in court?

bb1 wrote:He must go looking for these things, Lily - no-one else ever stumbles across them by 'accident'.

And isn't it interesting that apparently, he was unable to prove his allegations about Mr Smethurst in court?

Nor was he able to prove his allegations of the supposed friends of Mr. Smethurst. Or even if they were friends of Mr. Smethurst.
Bennett is one sick puppy.

And I would still like to know how this particular peculiarity is possible.

Actually, belay the last pipe. I don't want to know. I shall leave Mr. Bennett to dream on.
Sick effing barstard.

Sabot wrote:

bb1 wrote:He must go looking for these things, Lily - no-one else ever stumbles across them by 'accident'.

And isn't it interesting that apparently, he was unable to prove his allegations about Mr Smethurst in court?

Nor was he able to prove his allegations of the supposed friends of Mr. Smethurst. Or even if they were friends of Mr. Smethurst.
Bennett is one sick puppy.

And I would still like to know how this particular peculiarity is possible.

Actually, belay the last pipe. I don't want to know. I shall leave Mr. Bennett to dream on.
Sick effing barstard.

We knew he wouldn't be able to prove his allegations regarding Mr. Smethurst and friends, Bonny. If he could have, he would have produced them in a nano second.

As he's a dirty old man, he must have some truly disgusting things on his computer.

lily wrote:

Sabot wrote:

bb1 wrote:He must go looking for these things, Lily - no-one else ever stumbles across them by 'accident'.

And isn't it interesting that apparently, he was unable to prove his allegations about Mr Smethurst in court?

Nor was he able to prove his allegations of the supposed friends of Mr. Smethurst. Or even if they were friends of Mr. Smethurst.
Bennett is one sick puppy.

And I would still like to know how this particular peculiarity is possible.

Actually, belay the last pipe. I don't want to know. I shall leave Mr. Bennett to dream on.
Sick effing barstard.

We knew he wouldn't be able to prove his allegations regarding Mr. Smethurst and friends, Bonny. If he could have, he would have produced them in a nano second.

As he's a dirty old man, he must have some truly disgusting things on his computer.

I think he has put those on Memory Sticks, Lily. And then hidden them somewhere else.
I hope The Police don't know where they are because his friends will be culpable.

I hope he has shoved his memory sticks somewhere suitable.

bb1 wrote:I hope he has shoved his memory sticks somewhere suitable.

He definitely has the look of a severe constipation sufferer on his ugly visage. LL

bb1 wrote:I hope he has shoved his memory sticks somewhere suitable.

I dread to think....

Lamplighter wrote:

bb1 wrote:I hope he has shoved his memory sticks somewhere suitable.

He definitely has the look of a severe constipation sufferer on his ugly visage. LL

Right now is when I would love to use our old forum smiley of the fireman with the big hose. As that might bring him some relief, LL.

lily wrote:

bb1 wrote:I hope he has shoved his memory sticks somewhere suitable.

I dread to think....

Moi aussi. I don't even want to think about this, let alone Google it.

bb1 wrote:I hope he has shoved his memory sticks somewhere suitable.

Didn't he slip up a time back and post who was keeping them?
A certain Independent runner?

I have a dim memory of something like that, Tony....

bb1 wrote:I have a dim memory of something like that, Tony....

I remember, there was some kind of hoohaa going on, I think on MF or Haverns and he did indeed say that everything had been copied over to memory sticks and then given to someone for safekeeping. That way, he reasoned, there would be nothing incriminating on his PC. LL

Lamplighter wrote:

bb1 wrote:I have a dim memory of something like that, Tony....

I remember, there was some kind of hoohaa going on, I think on MF or Haverns and he did indeed say that everything had been copied over to memory sticks and then given to someone for safekeeping. That way, he reasoned, there would be nothing incriminating on his PC. LL

He presented it as though it was some top secret evidence which had to go for safekeeping in case the worst happened.

Er....come to think of it, that is what it would be if he didn't want it discovered on his computer.

lily wrote:

Lamplighter wrote:

bb1 wrote:I have a dim memory of something like that, Tony....

I remember, there was some kind of hoohaa going on, I think on MF or Haverns and he did indeed say that everything had been copied over to memory sticks and then given to someone for safekeeping. That way, he reasoned, there would be nothing incriminating on his PC. LL

He presented it as though it was some top secret evidence which had to go for safekeeping in case the worst happened.

Er....come to think of it, that is what it would be if he didn't want it discovered on his computer.

Unless he completely destroyed his hard drive, everything he has written on his computer remains.

crazytony wrote:

lily wrote:

Lamplighter wrote:

bb1 wrote:I have a dim memory of something like that, Tony....

I remember, there was some kind of hoohaa going on, I think on MF or Haverns and he did indeed say that everything had been copied over to memory sticks and then given to someone for safekeeping. That way, he reasoned, there would be nothing incriminating on his PC. LL

He presented it as though it was some top secret evidence which had to go for safekeeping in case the worst happened.

Er....come to think of it, that is what it would be if he didn't want it discovered on his computer.

Unless he completely destroyed his hard drive, everything he has written on his computer remains.

So there is no point in keeping his memory stick warm then?

Sadie, no

So there is no point in keeping his memory stick warm then

sadie wrote:

crazytony wrote:

lily wrote:

Lamplighter wrote:
I remember, there was some kind of hoohaa going on, I think on MF or Haverns and he did indeed say that everything had been copied over to memory sticks and then given to someone for safekeeping. That way, he reasoned, there would be nothing incriminating on his PC. LL

He presented it as though it was some top secret evidence which had to go for safekeeping in case the worst happened.

Er....come to think of it, that is what it would be if he didn't want it discovered on his computer.

Unless he completely destroyed his hard drive, everything he has written on his computer remains.

So there is no point in keeping his memory stick warm then?

Sadie, do you mind. We do not wish to consider where he might have shoved his Memory Stick.

Well he did have 6 mistresses according to Tango.

lily wrote:Well he did have 6 mistresses according to Tango.

He'd need a good Memory to keep up with that many.