BENNETT IS BONKERS - THE NEVER-ENDING STORY

Lamplighter wrote:

Sabot wrote:France will refuse to Extradite me. I ain't done nuffink in UK what is a crime in France.

And I have dual nationality so out comes my non-UK passport. LL

We could always Video Conference to The Court, LL. If they are paying. And I have got quite a lot I would like to say

Lamplighter wrote:

Jean-Pierre.t50 wrote:I get the impression that Tony (Perry Mason) Bennett thinks he can choose what witnesses to call, and would love to call the McCanns. And ambush them with questions from the "research team".Perhaps one of the interminable "phone" threads.

His is in for a surprise.

I remember somewhere his boasting that he would get them into court and his questions would be in-depth and probing. He's got about much knowledge about legal procedures as a squashed amoeba! LL

He would do well to remember that this is a hearing about his failure to comply with the Undertaking HE gave to the High Court?

I wonder who Bennett is getting advice from?

it includes an offer to give evidence in court from a person well-qualified in her field

If it's Agent Z Cocomental Midas the Cheshire 'lifestyle coach' and hypnotherapist, he's got a bit of a problem.

Sources say the vile and obscene 'Rothely' troll is none other than Zoe herself, who is now barking-at-the-moon bonkers.

Anything could happen if he sticks her in the witness box - like her head spinning round 360o.

I don't think he really understands what is going on, or just what he has done. He seems to think that this is a game of Chase the Pisser, get The McCanns into Court and then brow beat them into confessing to something or other. If he doesn't like the rules he changes them. And of course, his cohorts are egging him on and convincing him he is a master with words.
The Judge is not going to like this.

Anything could happen if he sticks her in the witness box - like her head spinning round 360o.

As Sabot said, the judge isn't going to like this. I think that if he rambles and goes off on tangents, then he won't like it.

I am actually not joking when I say I could see Bennett being sent to the cells by the judge, Lily.

Bennett seems to think that this is all some kind of game, and that he can behave as badly in court as he does on the internet.

IMO, he is in for a very rude awakening.

This is the problem, Bonny. The Internet can have a very bad effect on people whose reason isn't up to scratch. They get carried away and finish up thinking that it's the same in the real world and that they have some sort of charmed existence that allows them to behave as they like.

Well he certainly does seem to have a disconnect from reality.......

He's not the only one....

Chris Stedman ‏ @ChrisRStedman Reply Retweet Favorite · Open
@SafariSara Mr. Bennett is qualified and knows the law. The case against him is not for libel; check your facts. He's not libelled #McCann

bb1 wrote:He's not the only one....

Chris Stedman ‏ @ChrisRStedman Reply Retweet Favorite · Open
@SafariSara Mr. Bennett is qualified and knows the law. The case against him is not for libel; check your facts. He's not libelled #McCann

ETA: I just burned my lip!

bb1 wrote:He's not the only one....

Chris Stedman ‏ @ChrisRStedman Reply Retweet Favorite · Open
@SafariSara Mr. Bennett is qualified and knows the law. The case against him is not for libel; check your facts. He's not libelled #McCann

Not at this stage it's not, but it's heading back that way to before he signed that Undertaking.

Chris Stedman ‏ @ChrisRStedman Reply Retweet Favorite · Open
@SafariSara No, it's not to stop libelling #McCann; it is to stop distributing literature, I believe.


I wonder, are forkers born with some sort of comprehension impairment, that they cannot actually grasp reality?

How has that one managed to miss complaints 2-25, libelling the McCanns in breach of the undertaking Bennett made to the High Court?

bb1 wrote:http://thehoundingofthemccans.blogspot.co.uk/2012/04/tube-of-year-award-goes-to-bozo-brit.html

Please let it be Stedman who is giving Bennett advice.

You never know about him being Bennett's adviser, but it wouldn't really be like Stedman to give free advice to anyone.

He charges £20 ($32) for his kindle offering on how to make a fortune.

http://www.amazon.co.uk/The-Penny-Book-Millionaire-ebook/dp/B007M4DVYO/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&qid=1333647952&sr=8-3

greenink211 wrote:You never know about him being Bennett's adviser, but it wouldn't really be like Stedman to give free advice to anyone.

He charges £20 ($32) for his kindle offering on how to make a fortune.

http://www.amazon.co.uk/The-Penny-Book-Millionaire-ebook/dp/B007M4DVYO/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&qid=1333647952&sr=8-3

I think I will write a book on, how to spot a fool
I shall call it, "It will stand you in good steed-man"

Absolutely nothing these lunatics did would surprise me any more. It's most bizarre, ordinary, everyday words, in the English language, seem to have different meanings in their world....

crazytony wrote:

greenink211 wrote:You never know about him being Bennett's adviser, but it wouldn't really be like Stedman to give free advice to anyone.

He charges £20 ($32) for his kindle offering on how to make a fortune.

http://www.amazon.co.uk/The-Penny-Book-Millionaire-ebook/dp/B007M4DVYO/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&qid=1333647952&sr=8-3

I think I will write a book on, how to spot a fool
I shall call it, "It will stand you in good steed-man"

Think it might work too seeing how many gullible people can be found on the internet.

Oh dear, dissent on Bennett's favourite forum from yoyo:

Stella had done an excellent job - its a shame she was banned over something that could have been resolved in a better way IMO..
Judge Mental, Kangdang, and Autumn, all of whom I consider as good contributors as well were also banned.
It's a real lost of good contributors as they were very dedicated to seeking the truth for Maddie and they had contributed rather well.
JM and Stella were also good at keeping out trolls. All IMHO of course.

They don't get it, do they - THEY ARE THE TROLLS.

They tick every single box for trolling, with their sick posts, and their vile imaginations, and their enthusiasm for splattering every media site that lets them with hatespam.

PS - Mental is still active in the Truthseekers, sadly having gone totally, well, mental, and is now one of the most foul-mouthed, multi-headed trolls on the internet.

bb1 wrote:Oh dear, dissent on Bennett's favourite forum from yoyo:

Stella had done an excellent job - its a shame she was banned over something that could have been resolved in a better way IMO..
Judge Mental, Kangdang, and Autumn, all of whom I consider as good contributors as well were also banned.
It's a real lost of good contributors as they were very dedicated to seeking the truth for Maddie and they had contributed rather well.
JM and Stella were also good at keeping out trolls. All IMHO of course.

They don't get it, do they - THEY ARE THE TROLLS.

They tick every single box for trolling, with their sick posts, and their vile imaginations, and their enthusiasm for splattering every media site that lets them with hatespam.

PS - Mental is still active in the Truthseekers, sadly having gone totally, well, mental, and is now one of the most foul-mouthed, multi-headed trolls on the internet.

So who do they think these people were, and why were they banned? Or did I miss something?
I thought they were all horrible hate mongers, so I don't really understand what went on.
Do I really need to?

No, there is no need for anyone normal to wonder why, Sabot, it's just part of their endless bloodletting - a bit like the Borgias.

bb1 wrote:No, there is no need for anyone normal to wonder why, Sabot, it's just part of their endless bloodletting - a bit like the Borgias.

But that one, whoever it was, can't even write reasonably good English. So how is anyone supposed to understand what they are on about, let alone assume that they ever understood The FILES.