BENNETT STARS IN HARLOW STAR

lily wrote:Yer, Sabot. They iz riting comentz two the Starr like wot this iz


Haven't the Mccanns got to prove he's lying before taking him for libel?

So not only are they illiterate, they are ignorant as well. Still, no harm in letting Harlow know that.

They are everything but clued into the law.

It's amusing watching the ignorants write to the Star, isn't it?

Another favorite is them mentioning the police files.

Re: Harlow Star covers the McCanns' application to put me in jail
Jean Today at 11:05 am

One or two trolls there ("UnaWinchester" also briefly graced this forum with her presence) but generally a good reaction. Pam Gurney obviously hasn't got whiff of the story yet!

Well done to the paper for printing the comments.

That one still doesn't get it, does she? SHE IS THE TROLL.

No surprises - gillytroll has turned up on the Star:

gillyspot
Thank you Harlow Star for publishing an unbiased article regarding Tony Bennett & the McCann couple. If they don't have anything to hide why have they sued 24+ individuals & media companies?

lily wrote:They are everything but clued into the law.

It's amusing watching the ignorants write to the Star, isn't it?

Another favorite is them mentioning the police files.

I quite liked Bennett's plea about being polite or The Harlow Star would withdraw Comments.

Sabot wrote:

lily wrote:They are everything but clued into the law.

It's amusing watching the ignorants write to the Star, isn't it?

Another favorite is them mentioning the police files.

I quite liked Bennett's plea about being polite or The Harlow Star would withdraw Comments.

Sabot, even he is ashamed of them.

I find it most amusing that they all think 'troll' means someone who disagrees with Bennett

Trolls never look in the mirror. They would scare themselves to death if they did.

The Star staff must be ROFLMAO-ing at the hatespam from Bennett's flying monkeys. I am sure they know a very great deal about Bennett that they couldn't possibly publish

ETA, could the comments from the flying monkeys be used in court as evidence of the damage Bennett and Gonc have done to Madeleine McCann?

Why should Anthony Bennett not be allowed to have an opinion which, after all, is the same as mine and many, many thousands of those who have read the Official Files?

When is Team Gonc going to tell the hounders and haters that what they call the "Official Files" are anything but?

They don't seem to grasp that they can have as many 'opinions' as they want - if they keep them to themselves, and their hate sites.

BENNETT TOOK HIS OBSESSIONS AND HATRED INTO THE REAL WORLD, INTO REAL PEOPLE'S REAL LIVES.

Who cares about their 'opinions' - you know the old joke about them, and everyone having one.

There is a huge difference between having an 'opinion', however stupid, nasty and wrong, and deliberately starting a campaign of harrassment, libel and stalking, as Bennett did.

He boasted about hiding in the Kennedy family's shrubbery, he moaned because the Smethursts didn't have enough windows in their barn conversion home for him to peer in.

And we all know what he did to the McCanns - repeatedly.

That is NOT 'having an opinion'. That is a deliberate campaign of harrassment of supporters of the McCann family. In my opinion.

That's not an Opinion, Bonny. That's a Fact.

Bennett is a nasty, vicious old man who uses his ill found opinions to attack innocent people.
He was obviously going to write a book, if he hasn't already written it. Pity about that.

Bennett is a nasty, vicious old man who uses his ill found opinions to attack innocent people.

I believe you missed out the words devious, jealous and vengeful, Sabot?

No, she forgot to say, JMHO, of course!

All the forkers and hounders wrongly think that if they stick that at the end of their hateposts, it gets them off the hook.

bb1 wrote:

Bennett partial to the old hubbly-bubbly, is he? Must be, to have a hookah on proud display. And he appears to have mended his glasses with sticking plaster.

Less money on hookahs = more money for Specsavers.

Are you sure it isn't one of these in the background?

Could be worse, I suppose, it could have been a hooker.

http://thehoundingofthemccans.blogspot.co.uk/2012/11/you-gotta-know-when-to-hold-them-know.html

Yup; it was very foolish of Bennett to issue instructions to his cult to hatespam the Star. Shows how little genuine support he has.

Good one, Tony.

What about the thousand some members he allegedly has on his sick hole?
I see but a handful from there supporting him.

This is their claim, Tony:

We have 2022 registered users

Why they do that, I do not know. It's glaringly obvious they have perhaps a tenth of that, and even fewer active members. After all, if every one of those 2022 donated a tenner to Bennett, he'd be able to afford top-flight representation.

But that's the trouble with socks, isn't it? They aren't real so don't have real money.

Bennett is Devious, Jealous and Vengeful in my NSHO. [Not So Humble Opinion]

Thank you for reminding me, Lily and Bonny. My Humble Thanks. I often give humble thanks, especially for small mercies.

They are just so pathetic. And that, is the only civil description I can give to describe them.

Looks like another own goal by

Comments Closed.

Well done everyone. A good case against Bennett and The Hounders has been made, and it is still there for all to see.

And Bennett's fan club showed themselves up yet again.

I wonder, when he is up for sentencing in the High Court, are they all going to pack in there and shout TROLL! at the judge if they don't like what they're hearing?

On today's showing, they are quite capable of it.