More woe for Bennett

It is patently obvious they have never lost anyone dear to them, a child, a wife, a parent. Even though my own sorrow is over 40 years gone, I feel so numb for those parents, the siblings left behind, the grandparents and other relatives. No parent should outlive their child, and no child should die at such a young age under a hail of bullets. Yes, kids do die, usually of diseases or other medical problems, but they should never die as the whim of a deranged killer. It makes me so angry that scum like those posters, sitting at home in comfort should be allowed to voice their insane opinions. Where has compasion gone in these days of deliberate bullying? LL

Blacksmith had Bennett and his brown-nosers well summed-up, IMO:

For him the Madeleine McCann affair is simply the latest in a number of career opportunities. For years he has circled overhead like some huge, clumsy vulture until he has picked out an appropriate tragic mystery to flap down and feed on, always, always with an eye to the thrills which this parade of human suffering brings him. Mr Bennett thrives, indeed has for the last decade made his life in, this corpse-ridden vale of tears. He loves it and all the perks that come with it, if, that is, one can stand the stink that never goes away. Mr Bennett particularly likes the pleasures of publicity and he loves pain; he likes witnessing it and probing at the circumstances that surround it.

It's a pity every single one of Bennett's sadistic supporters will not be in the dock with him in January.

Incidentally, why is it never his wife Bennett drags into his lies, but always his mother?

Bit Jimmy Savile-ish, is that. IMO.

bb1 wrote:He is now reduced to getting his ideas from Icke's lot, Sabot. Oh, and censoring any opinion that doesn't toe the Hounder Party Line, like a good little Free Speacher.

Why he thinks that makes it go away, I do not know. That is, what, the fourth or fifth time they have silenced dissent in a matter of days.

Wot? He hasn't banned more people, has he? Probably pissed off because he fired an Own Goal yet again.
He never thinks anything through. Does he really think that we are just going to sit here and let him get away with his shite?

If Bennett is going to ban dissenters, and remove all trace of them, then he really should learn not to leave shadows behind:



Aw, did the bad poster upset Tone? Bless!

Here's something else to upset him:

http://blacksmithbureau.blogspot.co.uk/2012/12/tidying-up.html

His sicko remarks about Sandyhook haven't passed unnoticed..

Like the ending.

**** Justice for Maddie (from Norbury) writes: "I pity you. Finished licking the arse of David Cameron yet? Slobbering over fat paedophiles in the House of lords? Betraying that good man Tony Bennett who publicly thanked me for my support recently? Poor blaCksmith you will never understand that murdock and Cameroon planned the Yard whitewash together over a year ago. try asking to get real."

Chorus, to the music of Springtime for Hitler: Just - ice for Mad - dy (from Nor-bury) etc..




PS - for Bennett's benefit, that isn't a real comment, so no need to start fawning like you did last time.

Blacksmith's Blogs are becoming a pleasure to read. Not sure whose side he is on, but that doesn't really matter. They are incredibly well written, and I do enjoy reading well written English.
Although there is a bit of that on here most of the time. When it's not screamingly funny.
I, apparently, have a very weird sense of humour, but so do you all. Thank God.

Huh, but I don't have a sense of humour, everyone knows that .... LL

Not sure whose side he is on, but that doesn't really matter.

It isn't really about 'sides' though, is it? The 'antis' for want of a better word, think they know better than the police and legal authorities of two European nations; they think they know better than the governments of two European nations.

Now, they could chunter away, in an Icke-ish fashion, with their conspiraloon tripe, from now till Kingdom Come, it wouldn't matter. You know what they say about opinions and everyone having one.

But Bennett and his gang of prodnoses won't do that. They think they are ENTITLED to smear, harrass, lie about and generally try to make miserable - anyone they target, but generally the McCanns, and people who support them.

BENNETT AND THE HOUNDERS THINK THEY ARE ABOVE THE LAW.

They need to be very firmly put in their place and told they aren't by the REAL authorities, in the person/s of the High Court.

Just look at Bennett today, attacking the families caught up in the Sandyhook slayings. That was stomach-turning; who the Hell does he think he is?

Look at the carry-on he and the Hounders had via Zoopla, over the interior decor of the Kennedys and Smethursts.

That is not normal behaviour. Indeed, it was a most effeminate display of bitchiness and jealousy.

But the really unforgiveable thing is that he and his gang took their irrational hatred into real people's, real lives, with no aim except to cause hurt.

Personally, I wouldn't care if the courts locked Bennett up and threw the key away. If he won't respect the law, why should the law respect him?

http://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/madeleine-mccann.983295/page-28

Thomas1965
Draftee

I knew the troll would talk behind my back the minute I claimed I was leaving.....foolish boy.

Enlighten me - how can you talk behind someone's back...on an open internet site?

Another one with brain-worm in her chakras.

Speaking of brain-worm....

McMINUTES VIDEO: When was the last time ANYONE saw Madeleine? (Apart from T9)
HiDeHo Today

Does she never, ever tire of churning out these pointless, identical fillums? Each one is worse than the one before it.....You know, I think they must all have brain-worm, it would explain a lot.

So, Bennett's at it again, demanding that anyone who disagrees with him is banned from the Aussie forum.

Never changes, does he? He can smear, harrass and libel anyone he likes, but God forbid anyone should challenge him.

He won't be able to go crying to the mods in the High Court, will he? In case his cult miss it in his Aussie tanty:

I have in fact publicly disclosed that I was willing to settle with the McCanns. However, their costs in the current action to date exceed £150,000 and there is no way I could meet that amount or anything like it.

Just a reminder that, not only has he ADMITTED three breaches of the settlement he agreed to, he has further admitted being in the wrong by making a derisory offer to the McCanns.

And what a lot of lovely screengrabs for interested parties!

Bennett throwing his toys out of the pram:

http://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/madeleine-mccann.983295/page-29

Hilarious! Must have taken him hours to write that rant - shouldn't think the Aussies have seen anything like it before.

Bennett has a genius for making enemies wherever he goes. As well as running to the mods and crying

Nice meltdown Tony!

Think someone needs a teaspoon of cement

MWAHAHAHAHAHA,

That display of spinelessness has really impressed people, NOT.

Please read the excellent summary interim report of Inspector Tavares de Almedia

Yeah, Bennett, tell them to read the discredited half-time score written by yet another alleged PJ torturer - way to go!

http://thehoundingofthemccans.blogspot.co.uk/2012/12/yea-gods-bennett-it-is-one-lie-after.html

Good catch, Tony!

Does Bennett ever stop LYING?

The claims of being ‘chucked out’ are wholly false.

No, they are not.

Has he forgotten - other people in UKIP were witnesses? One even wrote a book, as in our Tony's screenshot?

And:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthony_Bennett_(politician)

In early 2002, he was banned from holding office in the party in 2004 after he privately circulated a pamphlet in which he called the prophet Muhammad a paedophile

Hilarious, really - Bennett has done EXACTLY what people predicted he would when he wasn't protected by tame mods.

1. Emit a load of hot air, bombast and bolleaux.

2. Be challenged on above bolleaux.

3. Run away.

4. Spit out dummy and write interminable rant, demanding that anyone who criticises him be banned.

I doubt very much if his Aussie hosts are impressed by his conduct; yet another site that bitterly regrets letting the Vampire over the doorstep.

The man is a bald faced liar!
If he keeps it up, I'll join the Australian board and, show him up

I really don't know why he does it, Tony. Why he thinks he should be allowed to get away with telling such barefaced lies, I really do not know.

It's a matter of public record that he was kicked out of UKIP; the business with the solicitors' rolls is a matter of record, too.

I can only assume his brown-nosers are too stupid to check for themselves and see that their Dear Leader is telling flat-out lies.

As for this -

The Lee Balkwell case is another apparent hoax which I have investigated for the past 6 year

A HOAX?? FFS!

I hope someone pms the mods and tells them EXACTLY what Bennett did to Lee Balkwell's widow, disgusting man

crazytony wrote:The man is a bald faced liar!
If he keeps it up, I'll join the Australian board and, show him up

I wish you would.

Sadly, it is almost impossible to make these people understand what Bennett has done, and why some of us are so incensed. Six years of this horror story is a long time.
Okay, so I'm a lonely old fart with nothing better to do.

I have just read the first few pages of that thread that I originally missed, and believe me, they ain't stupid. They were doing fine until Bennett and Co appeared.

It's clear that they have no time for his conspiraloonacy, Sabot, and that they aren't impressed by the pitchforkers.

I am hoping that they will see links to us in their stats, and will decide to see for themselves just how sick Bennett is, and why so many people loathe him.

Oh, in case we do have any Aussie visitors - please, ask Bennett about the £50,000 costs he is being required to pay for his vile harrassment of the Smethurst family.


http://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/madeleine-mccann.983295/page-30

bb1 wrote:It's clear that they have no time for his conspiraloonacy, Sabot, and that they aren't impressed by the pitchforkers.

I am hoping that they will see links to us in their stats, and will decide to see for themselves just how sick Bennett is, and why so many people loathe him.

I have got an horrible suspicion that they think we are all nuts, Bonny. And probably not surprising. I sometimes think that I am nuts. And even my children do as well. Until one of them came here for two months, and staggered through The Anthony Trial with me. The horror of that all was mind blowing, and we both had a very large glass of wine when The Verdict came in. But my Rob is a very bright boy with no sides.
And of course, he got treated to a bit of Pitch Forking on The McCann Front.
But you just can't put across what is happening in a passing conversation.

Dear me! I see someone has stuck the TRUTH about assorted legal actions against him on Bennett's home roost, with the message:

But Tony, you have been proclaiming that you have not had to pay any damages to anybody. Problem is this, how can anyone start to believe what is said, when on other fora, you are contrdicting yourself when the posts are actually on here.
I actually joined up here to find for myself what evidence there was to suggest the parents were involved, but it is just the same old things said over and over again with no basis to back anything up. Evidence is not "such and such said this and such and such said that". Mr Bennett is supposed to be a lawyer, but even he would know that heresay is useless.

So I can guess I will be banned from here for not agreeing with you

Doubtless.

Hilarious, watching Bennett wriggle and squirm. What a spectacle his High Court date is going to be!

Bennett's caused a bit of a disaster, hasn't he?

http://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/madeleine-mccann.983295/page-30

I am sure the Aussies are more than capable of reading further, and finding out for themselves what a lying toerag he is.

For any Aussies who may drop by, here's what the UK media think of Bennett and his gang:

Oh, and here's Bennett's former sidekick Butler starring in the UK press: