Similar topics
Search
Latest topics
BENNETT GETS HIS DAY IN COURT
+7
barbiecar
Lamplighter
Maggs
muratfan
lily
rhodes
bb1
11 posters
Page 5 of 18
Page 5 of 18 • 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 11 ... 18
Re: BENNETT GETS HIS DAY IN COURT
Me neither, Barbie - what a bunch of fantasists.
They're funny when they're like this:
I also believe Tony will win this case, simply because the judge is human and apart from the pathetic evidence, and the fact that the Mcs wheel out the lawyers and barristers the judge will see, hear and realise TB is been bullied nothing more nothing less.
Why will this judge jail Tony, a pensioner, when hearing that Gunnell lied to trick Tony....as he admitted to day in court.
Course he did. Why wouldn't he? Have they forgotten what Mike Gunnill does for a living? Here's a hint - try thinking 'fake sheik' and they might grasp why that is of very little importance.
Bet the court laughed when Bennett started going on about Butler and emails, though. Don't know how Ms Page managed to keep a straight face.
They're funny when they're like this:
I also believe Tony will win this case, simply because the judge is human and apart from the pathetic evidence, and the fact that the Mcs wheel out the lawyers and barristers the judge will see, hear and realise TB is been bullied nothing more nothing less.
Why will this judge jail Tony, a pensioner, when hearing that Gunnell lied to trick Tony....as he admitted to day in court.
Course he did. Why wouldn't he? Have they forgotten what Mike Gunnill does for a living? Here's a hint - try thinking 'fake sheik' and they might grasp why that is of very little importance.
Bet the court laughed when Bennett started going on about Butler and emails, though. Don't know how Ms Page managed to keep a straight face.
bb1- Slayer of scums
- Location : watcher on the wall
Join date : 2011-06-24
Re: BENNETT GETS HIS DAY IN COURT
More than that, she is working for the Mccanns and she offered him help at one point!
barbiecar- Slayer of scums
- Join date : 2011-09-24
Re: BENNETT GETS HIS DAY IN COURT
Pathetic, isn't it? I cannot wait to see what version of events Bennett is going to come up with; it might be an idea for him to bear in mind that there were other witnesses, and no amount of spinning is going to change what is coming his way tomorrow.
bb1- Slayer of scums
- Location : watcher on the wall
Join date : 2011-06-24
Re: BENNETT GETS HIS DAY IN COURT
Tomorrow will be enough. He's banged to rights. Not important enough to jail, a pathetic little hounder who is his own worst enemy. Suspended sentence, nothing will happen, like everything else he does.
barbiecar- Slayer of scums
- Join date : 2011-09-24
Re: BENNETT GETS HIS DAY IN COURT
Ah, but should he get off with a financial penalty and a suspended sentence - then one wrong word and the sentence will no longer be suspended, he WILL be jailed.
bb1- Slayer of scums
- Location : watcher on the wall
Join date : 2011-06-24
Re: BENNETT GETS HIS DAY IN COURT
http://thehoundingofthemccans.blogspot.co.uk/2013/02/now-what-did-i-say-about-lyingwhat-did.html
A reminder that there was a webcam pointing at them.
A reminder that there was a webcam pointing at them.
bb1- Slayer of scums
- Location : watcher on the wall
Join date : 2011-06-24
Re: BENNETT GETS HIS DAY IN COURT
There were about 30 supporters there, someone had even taken a taxi from CORNWALL!
1. No, there were not - just because people are in a court room, it does not mean they support you.
2. Who in their right minds gets taxis from Cornwall to London? There are these things on sort of iron rails - called trains.
1. No, there were not - just because people are in a court room, it does not mean they support you.
2. Who in their right minds gets taxis from Cornwall to London? There are these things on sort of iron rails - called trains.
bb1- Slayer of scums
- Location : watcher on the wall
Join date : 2011-06-24
Re: BENNETT GETS HIS DAY IN COURT
PS - before telling lies, it's always a good idea to check with your fellow-hounders beforehand:
Nina Today at 5:08 pm
I have just had a phone call from friends who are with Tony. They have all just left the court and will be in touch. Tony sounds well, his supporters one who had driven from Cornwall today to be there number about a dozen. i spoke to 4 or 5 but there wasn't much credit on the mobile. Anyway they all sounded in very good spirits. There will be an official update later.
'About a dozen'? That's more like it.
And driven up from Cornwall? That's also much more like it.
No wonder Bennett had to give them instructions on going to the toilet.
Nina Today at 5:08 pm
I have just had a phone call from friends who are with Tony. They have all just left the court and will be in touch. Tony sounds well, his supporters one who had driven from Cornwall today to be there number about a dozen. i spoke to 4 or 5 but there wasn't much credit on the mobile. Anyway they all sounded in very good spirits. There will be an official update later.
'About a dozen'? That's more like it.
And driven up from Cornwall? That's also much more like it.
No wonder Bennett had to give them instructions on going to the toilet.
bb1- Slayer of scums
- Location : watcher on the wall
Join date : 2011-06-24
Re: BENNETT GETS HIS DAY IN COURT
I give Bennett a month, and he will be off again. But it won't take three years to get him into Court next time. His feet won't touch the ground.
Sabot- Slayer of scums
- Location : Bretagne
Join date : 2011-06-24
Age : 85
Re: BENNETT GETS HIS DAY IN COURT
Oh, here's Bennett's version:
***LATEST NEWS AND UPDATES FROM THE TRIAL HERE***
Tony Bennett Today at 9:01 pm
In brief:
The judge severely limited my questions to Carter-Ruck's Solicitor and Partner, Isabel Martorell.
I think I am right in saying (we shall see tomorrrow) that none of the facts relating to Madeleine's reported disappearance are of any relevance whatosever to this hearing.
Nor is the widespread availability of Dr Amaral's book; that was also ruled as irrelevant.
One issue that emerged during the hearing more than once was the McCanns' powerlessness to control the level of dissent about Madeleine. I was able to demonstrate that I was the only person on the entire planet who was actively being inhibited from expressing his opinions on the disappearance of Madeleine. That was also ruled entirely irrelevant to the issue of whether I had breached any of my undertakings.
The circumstances under which I agreed to give the undertakings - on 2 October 2009 following legal advice from Kirwans - were also deemed irrelevant. The fact that the only alternative I was faced with was to face a full-blown libel trial, up against the legal firepower of Carter-Ruck and with no Legal Aid for defamation cases, was also ruled irrelevant.
Michael Gunnill's evidence was that he obtained the '60 Reasons' book from me purely to make himself some money. He said he had asked the Editor of the Sunday Express if he would be interested in running a story on Tony Benentt breaking his undertakings. He said that the Editor said 'Yes', and so he tried to get a book from me by subterfuge. Having done so, the Editor never ran the story so he never got paid. On this forum, Mr Gunnill claimed to have received the book on 4 February 2010, but in his Affidavit he said it was on 1 February. He could not explain the discrepancy.
In her Affidavit, Ms Martorell had said on oath that 'Madeleine was abducted'. She conceded that she had been told that but didn't know whether or not that was true. Her information came from her clients.
The one ray of hope was that Mr Justice Tugendhat said that many of the issues I sought to raise would become relevant at a subsequent hearing at which I shall be applying to lift the stay on the libel proceedings - and (hopefully) then be able to argue the case to lift the undertakings. This hearing will not release me from my undertakings and it has been spelled out to me that unless and until the undertakings are lifted, I must not give my opinion on what may have happened to Madeleine.
The support at the Court was briliant - thanks so much to all who came.
Especial thanks to Enid O'Dowd, the accountant who wrote up an excellent analysis of the Fund. She flew over from the Irish Republic to help me. She was not allowed to be a witness for me at today's hearing, because Mr Justice Tugendhat deemed it irrelevant to the issues he had to decide. He did however say that her evidence might well be relevant at a future hearing.
There were 5 journalists present during various parts of the proceedings.
It all seems very very unjust
===========
At least he's admitting he heard the word IRRELEVANT rather a lot.
***LATEST NEWS AND UPDATES FROM THE TRIAL HERE***
Tony Bennett Today at 9:01 pm
In brief:
The judge severely limited my questions to Carter-Ruck's Solicitor and Partner, Isabel Martorell.
I think I am right in saying (we shall see tomorrrow) that none of the facts relating to Madeleine's reported disappearance are of any relevance whatosever to this hearing.
Nor is the widespread availability of Dr Amaral's book; that was also ruled as irrelevant.
One issue that emerged during the hearing more than once was the McCanns' powerlessness to control the level of dissent about Madeleine. I was able to demonstrate that I was the only person on the entire planet who was actively being inhibited from expressing his opinions on the disappearance of Madeleine. That was also ruled entirely irrelevant to the issue of whether I had breached any of my undertakings.
The circumstances under which I agreed to give the undertakings - on 2 October 2009 following legal advice from Kirwans - were also deemed irrelevant. The fact that the only alternative I was faced with was to face a full-blown libel trial, up against the legal firepower of Carter-Ruck and with no Legal Aid for defamation cases, was also ruled irrelevant.
Michael Gunnill's evidence was that he obtained the '60 Reasons' book from me purely to make himself some money. He said he had asked the Editor of the Sunday Express if he would be interested in running a story on Tony Benentt breaking his undertakings. He said that the Editor said 'Yes', and so he tried to get a book from me by subterfuge. Having done so, the Editor never ran the story so he never got paid. On this forum, Mr Gunnill claimed to have received the book on 4 February 2010, but in his Affidavit he said it was on 1 February. He could not explain the discrepancy.
In her Affidavit, Ms Martorell had said on oath that 'Madeleine was abducted'. She conceded that she had been told that but didn't know whether or not that was true. Her information came from her clients.
The one ray of hope was that Mr Justice Tugendhat said that many of the issues I sought to raise would become relevant at a subsequent hearing at which I shall be applying to lift the stay on the libel proceedings - and (hopefully) then be able to argue the case to lift the undertakings. This hearing will not release me from my undertakings and it has been spelled out to me that unless and until the undertakings are lifted, I must not give my opinion on what may have happened to Madeleine.
The support at the Court was briliant - thanks so much to all who came.
Especial thanks to Enid O'Dowd, the accountant who wrote up an excellent analysis of the Fund. She flew over from the Irish Republic to help me. She was not allowed to be a witness for me at today's hearing, because Mr Justice Tugendhat deemed it irrelevant to the issues he had to decide. He did however say that her evidence might well be relevant at a future hearing.
There were 5 journalists present during various parts of the proceedings.
It all seems very very unjust
===========
At least he's admitting he heard the word IRRELEVANT rather a lot.
bb1- Slayer of scums
- Location : watcher on the wall
Join date : 2011-06-24
Re: BENNETT GETS HIS DAY IN COURT
Isn't that her at the front wearing the black and white striped suit?bb1 wrote:
Can't see an Oompa-Loompa chained to the High Court railings, guess Butler didn't go after all.
rhodes- Slayer of scums
- Join date : 2011-06-27
Re: BENNETT GETS HIS DAY IN COURT
I was able to demonstrate that I was the only person on the entire planet who was actively being inhibited from expressing his opinions on the disappearance of Madeleine.
That would be the 17 pages of members posts and names?
Mr Gunnill claimed to have received the book on 4 February 2010, but in his Affidavit he said it was on 1 February. He could not explain the discrepancy.
Misremembering, are we? Didn't Ms Page, QC, have to step in and explain to the judge that you were confused and getting it wrong? And wasn't the judge happy that it was cleared up?
Especial thanks to Enid O'Dowd, the accountant who wrote up an excellent analysis of the Fund
Ena O' Forker's 'interpretation' of the Find Madeleine Fund has no more legal standing than mine would have. It is NOT a report by a proper forensic accountant, it is her very biased slant on it. But hey, if Bennett wants to drag her down with him, why should we care?
That would be the 17 pages of members posts and names?
Mr Gunnill claimed to have received the book on 4 February 2010, but in his Affidavit he said it was on 1 February. He could not explain the discrepancy.
Misremembering, are we? Didn't Ms Page, QC, have to step in and explain to the judge that you were confused and getting it wrong? And wasn't the judge happy that it was cleared up?
Especial thanks to Enid O'Dowd, the accountant who wrote up an excellent analysis of the Fund
Ena O' Forker's 'interpretation' of the Find Madeleine Fund has no more legal standing than mine would have. It is NOT a report by a proper forensic accountant, it is her very biased slant on it. But hey, if Bennett wants to drag her down with him, why should we care?
bb1- Slayer of scums
- Location : watcher on the wall
Join date : 2011-06-24
Re: BENNETT GETS HIS DAY IN COURT
Isn't that her at the front wearing the black and white striped suit?
I don't think she went, Rhodes, she was otherwise occupied twittering rubbish. Anyway, we'd know if she had gone - she'd have caused a scene, thrown herself at Bennett or something ghastly.
I don't think she went, Rhodes, she was otherwise occupied twittering rubbish. Anyway, we'd know if she had gone - she'd have caused a scene, thrown herself at Bennett or something ghastly.
bb1- Slayer of scums
- Location : watcher on the wall
Join date : 2011-06-24
Re: BENNETT GETS HIS DAY IN COURT
bb1 wrote:Isn't that her at the front wearing the black and white striped suit?
I don't think she went, Rhodes, she was otherwise occupied twittering rubbish. Anyway, we'd know if she had gone - she'd have caused a scene, thrown herself at Bennett or something ghastly.
the tall skinny one, with the orange face.....she looks like a crossing bollard
rhodes- Slayer of scums
- Join date : 2011-06-27
Re: BENNETT GETS HIS DAY IN COURT
HAHAHA, yes, sorry!
bb1- Slayer of scums
- Location : watcher on the wall
Join date : 2011-06-24
Re: BENNETT GETS HIS DAY IN COURT
Hounder:
It seems significant that the lawyer couldn't say under oath that Madeleine was abducted. Why not if she was?????
No, that's what Bennett is claiming she said.....it's not the same as it being true.
Oh well, they'll find out.
It seems significant that the lawyer couldn't say under oath that Madeleine was abducted. Why not if she was?????
No, that's what Bennett is claiming she said.....it's not the same as it being true.
Oh well, they'll find out.
bb1- Slayer of scums
- Location : watcher on the wall
Join date : 2011-06-24
Re: BENNETT GETS HIS DAY IN COURT
I PUT IT TO YOU THAT....I have no idea what I'm talking about, and why does that man in the wig keep telling me I'm irrelevant?
bb1- Slayer of scums
- Location : watcher on the wall
Join date : 2011-06-24
Re: BENNETT GETS HIS DAY IN COURT
Notice how Bennett has had the chance to say he never handed over 17 pages of posters information/??
But still he has avoided the issue
But still he has avoided the issue
muratfan- Slayer of scums
- Join date : 2011-06-26
Re: BENNETT GETS HIS DAY IN COURT
I think you mean he....
was able to demonstrate that I was the only person on the entire planet who was actively being inhibited from expressing his opinions on the disappearance of Madeleine.
His reality-challenged cult deserve all they get.
was able to demonstrate that I was the only person on the entire planet who was actively being inhibited from expressing his opinions on the disappearance of Madeleine.
His reality-challenged cult deserve all they get.
bb1- Slayer of scums
- Location : watcher on the wall
Join date : 2011-06-24
Re: BENNETT GETS HIS DAY IN COURT
Red Contrapreneur @RContrapreneur
Is it right Mr Gunnill lied, being unable to explain a discrepancy in dates? If true, he could be in for the high jump. All liars.
No, Mike Gunnill did no such thing, because there was no discrepancy, and is not for any 'high jump'. Neither is Ms Martorell.
They really should know better by now than to believe Bennett.
Is it right Mr Gunnill lied, being unable to explain a discrepancy in dates? If true, he could be in for the high jump. All liars.
No, Mike Gunnill did no such thing, because there was no discrepancy, and is not for any 'high jump'. Neither is Ms Martorell.
They really should know better by now than to believe Bennett.
bb1- Slayer of scums
- Location : watcher on the wall
Join date : 2011-06-24
Re: BENNETT GETS HIS DAY IN COURT
Why hasn't Bennett told his cult what Judge Tugendhat REALLY said about any possible libel trial? Was it not something like,
"Mr Bennett, you know perfectly well that this is not relevant to the matter in hand. It is possible that if a libel trial ensues, you may find that you will able to make this point"
"Mr Bennett, you know perfectly well that this is not relevant to the matter in hand. It is possible that if a libel trial ensues, you may find that you will able to make this point"
bb1- Slayer of scums
- Location : watcher on the wall
Join date : 2011-06-24
Re: BENNETT GETS HIS DAY IN COURT
Why hasn't Bennett told his cult that there was NO discrepancy in Mr Gunnill's evidence, and that it was HIM who was confused?
Odd that he hasn't mentioned that Ms Page, QC, had to come to his rescue and gently point out that the Reasons were DELIVERED to Mr Gunnill on the 1st, and passed on on the 4th?
And that the judge agreed that that cleared it up?
He also really should tell his cult that he has put words in Ms Martorell's mouth that she simply did not say. Just as he did previously to Judge Tugendhat.
Odd that he hasn't mentioned that Ms Page, QC, had to come to his rescue and gently point out that the Reasons were DELIVERED to Mr Gunnill on the 1st, and passed on on the 4th?
And that the judge agreed that that cleared it up?
He also really should tell his cult that he has put words in Ms Martorell's mouth that she simply did not say. Just as he did previously to Judge Tugendhat.
Last edited by bb1 on Tue Feb 05, 2013 10:23 pm; edited 1 time in total (Reason for editing : typo)
bb1- Slayer of scums
- Location : watcher on the wall
Join date : 2011-06-24
Re: BENNETT GETS HIS DAY IN COURT
Because they have spent all evening stating how happy and jovial Bennett was, and how the case was going so well.....
..All to be blown out of the water when Bennett started posting...
And if they look closely, Bennett has admitted he gave the names of the posters to court... I suggest they look closely what he wrote
..All to be blown out of the water when Bennett started posting...
And if they look closely, Bennett has admitted he gave the names of the posters to court... I suggest they look closely what he wrote
muratfan- Slayer of scums
- Join date : 2011-06-26
Re: BENNETT GETS HIS DAY IN COURT
I have never known such stupid, gullible people before. You know what's going to happen? When, as usual, the real world fails to match the Bennett version of events, they will just invent a new conspiracy theory involving the judge being a mason or something.
bb1- Slayer of scums
- Location : watcher on the wall
Join date : 2011-06-24
Page 5 of 18 • 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 11 ... 18
Similar topics
» Get 'em Goncalo Wants To Join Bennett In Court
» BENNETT - 'MY BOOK WILL STAND UP IN COURT'
» DATE AND COURT LOCATION OF BENNETT'S CASE
» BENNETT - 'MY BOOK WILL STAND UP IN COURT'
» DATE AND COURT LOCATION OF BENNETT'S CASE
Page 5 of 18
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Sun Dec 06, 2020 6:43 pm by Pedro Silva
» help Liam Scott
Sat May 02, 2020 1:05 pm by Pedro Silva
» WE STILL HOPE' Madeleine McCann parents vow to keep searching for their daughter in emotional Christmas message
Thu Dec 26, 2019 9:37 am by Pedro Silva
» Candles site
Fri Sep 20, 2019 6:40 pm by Pedro Silva
» Madeleine McCann's parents urge holidaymakers to take posters abroad with them this summer in bid to find their daughter
Sat Aug 03, 2019 7:33 pm by Pedro Silva
» Madeleine McCann investigation gets more funding
Wed Jun 05, 2019 10:44 pm by Pedro Silva
» new suspect in Madeleine McCann
Sun May 05, 2019 3:18 pm by Sabot
» NETFLIX DOCUMENTARY
Sat Apr 20, 2019 8:02 pm by Pedro Silva
» SUN, STAR: 'Cristovao goes on trial' - organised home invasions, etc
Sat Apr 20, 2019 7:54 am by Sabot