Re: BENNETT GETS HIS DAY IN COURT

**bb1** Tue Feb 05, 2013 6:42 pm

The judge must have wondered what kind of idiot he had posturing in front of him, that he had to tell Bennett that lawyer-client communications are confidential. Pcorneater

**lily** Tue Feb 05, 2013 6:45 pm

barbiecar wrote:
muratfan wrote:
bb1 wrote:Oh yes, indeedy. So, he made a complete t*t of himself - and I wonder which hounders were on the list of people who hadn't been charged for saying the same things as he did?

Fancy him reading them out in court! And didn't we say he was going to do something like that?

I do believe it was said he was giving the names and details of other posters..

I'd heard the same. How nice, he handed the judge a list of fellow hounders. Very honourable that was. So now the details of his fellow pitchforkers are in the hands of the judiciary.

When you think about it, I guess he was feeling contempt for the hounders and forkers who were not being called to account? He was there facing ruin and they were either sitting in the court room or at a computer screen.

He is not prepared to fall alone.

**bb1** Tue Feb 05, 2013 6:49 pm

I'd heard the same. How nice, he handed the judge a list of fellow hounders. Very honourable that was. So now the details of his fellow pitchforkers are in the hands of the judiciary.

All - what was it, 17 pages of posts and names? Shocked

Re: COURT 14 - Mr Justice Tugendhat - 10.30am tomorrow, Tuesday 5 February
ShuBob Today

Like I said before, no point in arguing. The facts will be known soon enough.

Someone better tell her - the facts are known. Oh, and she's bound to be on the list.

**crazytony** Tue Feb 05, 2013 6:49 pm

barbiecar wrote:
muratfan wrote:
bb1 wrote:Oh yes, indeedy. So, he made a complete t*t of himself - and I wonder which hounders were on the list of people who hadn't been charged for saying the same things as he did?

Fancy him reading them out in court! And didn't we say he was going to do something like that?

I do believe it was said he was giving the names and details of other posters..

I'd heard the same. How nice, he handed the judge a list of fellow hounders. Very honourable that was. So now the details of his fellow pitchforkers are in the hands of the judiciary.

BENNETT GETS HIS DAY IN COURT - Page 4 Pillock1

**lily** Tue Feb 05, 2013 6:54 pm

His supporters who were in court will know that that is the truth then..... Pcorneater

**lily** Tue Feb 05, 2013 6:55 pm

Is it true that when he complained about others being allowed to say things that he could not, that the Judge remarked that they had not given an undertaking?

**barbiecar** Tue Feb 05, 2013 6:56 pm

bb1 wrote:
I'd heard the same. How nice, he handed the judge a list of fellow hounders. Very honourable that was. So now the details of his fellow pitchforkers are in the hands of the judiciary.

All - what was it, 17 pages of posts and names?

Re: COURT 14 - Mr Justice Tugendhat - 10.30am tomorrow, Tuesday 5 February
ShuBob Today

Like I said before, no point in arguing. The facts will be known soon enough.

Someone better tell her - the facts are known. Oh, and she's bound to be on the list.

I believe it was 17, yes. You could get a lot of personal details on 17 pages, couldn't you?

**bb1** Tue Feb 05, 2013 6:58 pm

He did indeed, Lily.

Bennett need not even THINK about posting a load of lies about what happened today - the hounders weren't the only people taking an interest. Wink

I gather it's been reported on the BBC Midlands news, so I hope the press pick up on it tomorrow.

Speaking of press, didn't Mike Gunnill do well? Made Bennett look a right t*t, when he was playing at Perry Mason.

I put it to you indeed. rofl

**lily** Tue Feb 05, 2013 7:02 pm

I put it to you indeed

How pretentious. The lawyers may be having a bit of a laugh at that tonight?

**bb1** Tue Feb 05, 2013 7:06 pm

I gather these tweets refer to what was on BBC Midlands news - wish it had occurred to me to watch it:

hamisnotspam ‏@wotbutlerdid
@MrsMLouis Hmmm? The news is that Bennett looked dreadful approaching theRoyal Cts of Justice.He was in long black/white tweedy coat #mccann

hamisnotspam ‏@wotbutlerdid
@MrsMLouis His hair unkempt and he was pale and looking nervous and suspicious as he sideways glanced at camera. #mccann

hamisnotspam ‏@wotbutlerdid
@MrsMLouis The news said he was told by Adrienne P that it was not that he had written to people like the PM regarding the #mccann s

hamisnotspam ‏@wotbutlerdid
@MrsMLouis that found him in court today but the fact he had then written this and spread it about in public domain #mccann

**Maggs** Tue Feb 05, 2013 7:09 pm

He dropped Gonc and his crooks in it too rofl

**lily** Tue Feb 05, 2013 7:10 pm

Never mind, Bonny. hug

**bb1** Tue Feb 05, 2013 7:15 pm

It should be repeated later, I'll try and remember to watch it.

**lily** Tue Feb 05, 2013 7:20 pm

Maggs wrote:He dropped Gonc and his crooks in it too

Why not, Maggs? He is in trouble because of them. rofl

**muratfan** Tue Feb 05, 2013 7:27 pm

BBC East Midlands are covering the story

**Maggs** Tue Feb 05, 2013 7:28 pm

bb1 wrote:It should be repeated later, I'll try and remember to watch it.

Yes, Bonny 22.25 pm smile

**muratfan** Tue Feb 05, 2013 7:31 pm

Re: ***LATEST NEWS AND UPDATES FROM THE TRIAL HERE***
bristow Today at 8:15 pm

I was there today and I feel optimistic!

The Judge seemed very nice and fair imo and I really believe he listened to Tony.

Tony came across as eloquent and gracious and I personally think his questioning was bloody marvellous!

When I saw him albeit briefly after the court rose he seemed in fine fettle for a man who without doubt had a very unfair armoury.

There were about 30 supporters there, someone had even taken a taxi from CORNWALL!

I will say no more, it was Tonys day.

Let the spinning begin

**bb1** Tue Feb 05, 2013 7:38 pm

I know - someone should tell them a webcam was watching them. Oh, and the BBC. rofl

Another gem:

: ***LATEST NEWS AND UPDATES FROM THE TRIAL HERE***
bristow Today at 7:31 pm

tiny wrote:

Did you notice any mccann supporters there.

In a word, no.

How wrong can you be? biggrin

**lily** Tue Feb 05, 2013 7:40 pm

That would be because they were sitting quietly, dressed appropriately. Oh and did not need to be told how to behave etc. That is why they were 'not noticed'.

biggrin

ETA: Do they think this was a football match with each side wearing their team colors?

**bb1** Tue Feb 05, 2013 7:42 pm

Quite, Lily.

http://thehoundingofthemccans.blogspot.co.uk/?zx=bd7d5ff2f7285e1a

"TB then provided a list of people who were repeating allegations (17 pages) and said "it was not reasonable that they were not subject to proceedings but he was". Judge advised him they did not sign the undertaking.
So Bennett squealed on his own followers!

--------------

No wonder he wouldn't answer the question about him planning to do just that.

**lily** Tue Feb 05, 2013 7:47 pm

With a friend like Bennett, the hounders don't need enemies. Pcorneater

**barbiecar** Tue Feb 05, 2013 7:57 pm

Oh dear! I see that bristow is claiming the judge didn't recieve a list of fellow forkers from bennett today. They've got a surprise coming then. Carry on hounding.

**bb1** Tue Feb 05, 2013 8:02 pm

Barbie, I don't care what they think - I doubt if anyone here does. They are absolute fools. We KNOW what went on. If they choose to believe fables and inventions, well, that is their lookout.

That one doesn't even seem to know there is a webcam trained on the High Court, or who was actually in court.

**bb1** Tue Feb 05, 2013 8:05 pm

Why aren't they asking themselves why none of the Bennettos was allowed to phone or post in on their toilet breaks, or lunch break, or why Head Hounder still hasn't bothered posting? Pcorneater

**barbiecar** Tue Feb 05, 2013 8:06 pm

Didn't look like 30 drooling hounders there to me Bonnie.

Sponsored content