SPOT THE DIFFERENCE!

This may explain why he has been quiet recently.  He's been busy making up stories.......

Remind me again, did he really say that Hagland *cough* had been shopping for publishers who would leave the author(s) free and clear from any lawsuits arising from the book?

"The Bowels of The Institute of Directors?" Don't give up the day job, whoever wrote that. Libel and a Breach of Confidentiality hardly seems a problem.

I don't think he has a day job?  

lily wrote:I don't think he has a day job?  

Who? Bennett or Hagland?

Hagland, Bennett a la Walter Mitty.     

Don't expect to see it on the bookshelves soon, Lily.

Agreed, Sabot. No publisher will touch it at the moment.    

It's very rare to see writing that manages to be tedious, rambling, irrelevant and libellous all at once.  

lily wrote:Agreed, Sabot.  No publisher will touch it at the moment.     

Would you publish something like "The Bowels of The Institute of Directors?"

I most certainly would not publish carp like that, Sabot.  

Sources say the hounders lost another one a few days ago...

Re: ...and farewell

Kepharel on Sun 7 Jul 2013

Hi all,

I guess this will be right forum for me to say my farewells. I have been called a troll, when all I ever wanted to do was join in the forums and debate with others who broadly share my views on the Madeleine McCann case.

I would ask Admin to formally rescind my membership of this site on the basis that my contributions appear to be antagonistic to a number of long standing members. I feel at home with this site and will continue to use it with a visitor status, but feel that the harmony of the forum will be better served when the temptation to contribute has been taken out of my hands.

Thanks all and may you long continue to fight for justice for Madeleine.

-------

That'll have been TROLL!!!!! Jean and yoyo pointing and shrieking at him.

I see he's back and sounds very well ensconced.

I do wonder if he might be related to any of the posters over there.... 

Oh, no doubt he's a hater, red in tooth and claw, but the Trollfinder-Generals sniffed him and decided he smelled funny, or something.

Apparently, the mods claimed they didn't know how to delete accounts, just how to ban people - which is probably why they claim to have thousands of members, but only a dozen of them ever post.  

He's not banned he has posted today.    

This is how it starts out......

Trying to make sense of it all.
Kepharel Today at 7:29 pm

Okay, this is not a post that adds anything, any insight, into the mystery of what happened to Madeleine McCann, but it might be useful for those of us ‘researchers’ out there farming the fields of facts and theories that are available in the public domain. It’s a post that has been inspired by PeterMacs thread about going back to the beginning and starting all over again.

blah blah blah

Maybe they need to keep the numbers up.  

Sources say they have very few genuine members, Lily, more than a thousand of them are just names like, MrsFroofroo invented and stuck on the memberlist to make it look good.

Look at the stats - Myths first:


Total posts 175486 • Total topics 5047 • Total members 61

Now not-Bennett's:


Our users have posted a total of 137878 messages
We have 2441 registered users

With a fraction of not-Bennett's supposed membership, Myths have made some 40,000 more posts. And Myths hasn't been going as long as not-Bennett's.      

More falsehoods and delusions, like everything these people do.

Oh I totally agree which is why I thought he sounded familiar.  

Coz, he is a sock, like so many of the membership are.     

And obsessed with it....

I for one have used Microsoft ‘One Note’ to copy and paste information from the net, and use it’s quite handy search facility to find such things as, for example, Tapas names that occur in various articles I have stored on it. So looking up, say, Matthew Oldfield, will give me hits on PJ Interviews, Goncalo Amaral’s book, Blacksmith and Dr Martin Roberts blogs, quotes from Kate McCann’s book, and all the rest of it; all faithfully cut and pasted by me, without me having to trawl through the whole lot with fingers crossed I might get lucky or not, and missed something important.

What? He really needs to get a life, take up trainspotting or something interesting.     

What binds them?
Post whmon Today at 8:31 pm

Admin - I am pretty certain that this topic will have been covered already but I'm not sure where.

What are the possible reasons why the Tapas 7 should adhere to the Abduction theory? Let us start with the premise that no abduction took place, as that is the belief of the majority - so why do the T7 insist that it did? What is it that binds them together in their solidarity?.........

Because, dumbfkc, they know better than anyone else that Madeleine was abducted, that it isn't a 'theory', it is a fact.

And bottom-feeders who try to write an abducted child off as dead, at her parents' hands, are sick in the head - almost as sick as the abductor/s they protect and give comfort to every time they hit Submit on this vicious bullsh*t.

the belief of the majority - so why do the T7 insist that it did?

What majority would that be then? As it is not the majority of the British population, for instance, then they must mean the incredible, super duper armchair detectives of forum world?

As if....         

NOTHING seems to sink in with them, not what the Yard say, NOTHING. They are all in complete denial of reality, like a bunch of flat-earther, only nasty.

The only place all these ghoulish, depraved 'hypotheses' happened is in their sick imaginations - and they might like to ponder on what that says about them, that they can invent such things.

The hounders are currently all excited because the 'Smith sighting' was in the news again recently:

SMITH SIGHTING BEING MENTIONED AGAIN

It doesn't seem to have crossed whatever passes for their 'minds' that the reason it's being looked at again is because Mr Smith goes to such lengths to state who it ISN'T.  

They will find out eventually.  

A hounder's idea of how the Yard and PJ should work together:


assume they will be joining PJ inspectors for siesta time, sardine lunches if not getting paid for breaks ! why shouldn't they imo good time to brainstorm all their ideas together with a cigar if needed.

What, cops having four-hour boozy lunches and falling asleep afterwards, like last time? Let's hope archaic practices like that have been swept aside along with Amoral.

And as the PJ section dealing with Madeleine's disappearance is a woman, I hardly think she'll be spending most of the day feeding her face, drinking and smoking cigars.

I expect she and her officers will be doing what the Portuguese taxpayer employs them to do - WORK.