SUN - Hutton admits she trolls 'for the buzz'

She does sound manic.

That is hilarious, Greenink.

And that Poulton must have known this would happen.

Of course she did. Surely she would have known that if she were not doing that interview to shaft the anti McCanns, she would in all probability never work for the mainstream media again?

Is her career worth it to her?

Bennett sez - (snipped)



And thereby hangs a bit of a personal tale which I will share with you all. In the light of all that Hutton has said and done to me in the past year or so, it is slightly painful to recall, but here goes anyway.

Hutton first approached me soon after news broke about my contempt of court summons.

She told me she had legal experience and was a published author, was extremely sympathetic to me, and wanted to help me write out my defence. She told me she was good at writing and 'how to put things'.

I was desperate for some help at the time and arranged to meet her at a pub near her home in Kent, which was conveniently on the route to see my mother, who by then was in a care home in Sussex. I paid for the drinks.

In the end, I decided not to accept her offer (that's a story for another day perhaps).

Hutton must have thought she was a sure thing for the Six Mistresses shortlist when he paid for the drinks. Alas, Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned......

Cristobell Author ‏@RosalindaHu
2/2, 'saves kicking the dog' is an Irish/Scots expression, its a joke ffs!

No, it isn't a Scots/Irish expression, it's a Hutton expression. And it isn't funny. Still refusing to take responsibility, is she?

bb1 wrote:
Cristobell Author ‏@RosalindaHu  
2/2, 'saves kicking the dog' is an Irish/Scots expression, its a joke ffs!

No, it isn't a Scots/Irish expression, it's a Hutton expression. And it isn't funny.  Still refusing to take responsibility, is she?

From that, I guess she's zenophobic as well as all the other nasty things she has shown she is. LL

She and her chum Poulton both make claims to have 'Irish blood' when they're being obnoxious - they claim that 'their Irish blood is up'.

It is, of course, pure racism - would they blame 'Jewish blood'? Or 'West Indian blood'? It's very insulting to GENUINE Celts. But what else can you expect from the likes of them?

Hutton's in full passive-aggressive whine this morning:


To all those protesting or who may have wanted to do the interview themselves, would they have come across any better than I did? Would Sun readers for example empathise with Tony Bennett, Rothley Pillow, Ben Thompson, Zora or indeed any of the more extreme activists who campaign for Maddie? Would they have portrayed 'you all' in a good light?

NONE of them could have done a worse job than she did. Even Stuck Record wouldn't have come out with such an egotistical, ME ME ME ME ME piece.

She'd better face the fact that she's caused more damage to her own cause in one day than Evil Carter Ruck have managed in years.

The article was by Martin Daubney, NOT Sonia Poulton. He approached Sonia because he knew she was working on a McCann documentary and knew several people who, as campaigners, could be classed as trolls and he wanted someone who was willing to be identified.

And still the penny doesn't drop with dimwit Hutton.

Some forker:

I never imagine any of the prolific 'pros' are actually voicing their own, uninfluenced opinions as individuals, like us, who truly believe what they say.

I have this mental image of them all assembled every morming in a room for a de-brief and given their agenda for the day, before collecting their pay-packets at the end of the month.


What an absolute clown.

Do they actually believe sh*te like that? It explains a lot if they do, and that's a sample of their belief system.

Does it ever occur to them that people who support Madeleine and her family are NOT crazed, attention-seeking, mendacious drama queens - unlike them?

I am not even going to attempt to sum it up, it needs read as a whole, but this makes it clear that Hutton has been stitched up by her BFF Poulton, mainly for the benefit of one R. Murdoch. And doubtless Poulton's been promised lots more sofa spots on Sky News wittering on about soshal ishooes.

xxxxxxxxhttp://jillhavern.forumotion.net/t10939p20-sonia-poulton-outside-the-mccanns-front-door-picture-from-poulton-plus-message-from-a-forum-member

Amazing. ..A bit like the magician's slight of hand.
A magician is no more than a manipulator, and convinces his stooge that he himself has chosen a card, whereas in reality the magician already knows which card he wants YOU to choose.

Yup. It jumps right out at you when it's all laid out in order. If anyone could be guaranteed to make an ar@e of herself and wreck her own cause, it was the mendacious attention-seeker Hutton.

Butler may well have been Poulton's first choice, till Butler was caught with her hand in the family cookie jar. Indeed, I seem to recall that Poulton and Butler were bessie mates until the long arm of the law intervened.

Like Hutton, Butler was guaranteed to make an ar@e of herself.

Still hasn't sunk in with the Sisterhood.

Poulton didn't want someone that would speak calmly and rationally, and stick to known facts.

She wanted a mug to make a fool of herself, and make all the McCann-haters look like nasty, crazy, menopausal obsessives.

Oh my!

Sonia Poulton ‏@SoniaPoulton 42 mins42 minutes ago
@RadicalFeminist @TheSpectator7 @RosalindaHu that's not correct. It's about freedom of speech and Ros is fighting for that.

Radical Feminist ‏@RadicalFeminist 41 mins41 minutes ago
@SoniaPoulton @TheSpectator7 @RosalindaHu I thought she was fighting for Madeleine McCann

Sonia Poulton ‏@SoniaPoulton 39 mins39 minutes ago
@RadicalFeminist @TheSpectator7 @RosalindaHu the piece was not about Madeleine McCann it was about free speech.

Radical Feminist ‏@RadicalFeminist 37 mins37 minutes ago
@SoniaPoulton @TheSpectator7 @RosalindaHu Free speech is under attack. One way of doing that is by portraying critics as nasty trolls

Exactly, and Poulton and the Sun did that magnificently.

Let's remind ourselves of how it was originally touted:


Sonia Poulton‏@SoniaPoulton #journorequest am looking for a passionate #mccann anti, prepared to be identified for a newspaper feature. Chance to put case forward.

Anyone see anything about 'free speech' there? No, me neither. Poulton was looking for a gobby hater that could be relied upon to make an ar@e of herself - and her cause. And Hutton obliged.

But this does give Sonia the opportunity to put her Doco over as just Free Speech. Or anything else, according to what happens.

i.e. I had a right to doorstep The McCanns and ask them questions.

Everything Poulton says can be read two ways, Sabot. The likes of Hutton are only seeing what they want to see, IMO.

At its very simplest, Poulton is happy to work for the supposed 'enemy', Sky News. She set her supposed friend Hutton up for a complete disaster, which has done untold damage to their 'cause', in the supposed 'enemy', the Sun.

Both are part of the Murdoch empire......

Agreed, Bonny. I very much doubt that Sonia will stitch herself up. But I bet that Hutton won't be the last one that she does.

Well, she certainly isn't the first....

Sonia Poulton @SoniaPoulton  ·  1 hr 1 hour ago
@RosalindaHu @RadicalFeminist @TheSpectator7 you're strong Ros which is great because I trust you to do right thing and will support you.

I am confused. Hutton is, to my mind, extremely unstable. And has been hung out to dry by Poulton.

So. Where are protests, the hand wringing angst about Hutton being a potential suicide risk? Why is Poulton not being reviled by her own side? Why are the police not involved?

Good question J-P. Mutton clearly is extremely mentally unstable.

Hutton doesn't seem to grasp what she's done, J-P, or why all the outrage is coming from her own 'side'. The lack of self-awareness is staggering - almost as staggering as her ability to invent malicious falsehoods.

I am seeing a lot of people on her own 'side' wanting her to answer a few questions, like:

HOW MUCH DID THE SUN PAY HER TO DO SUCH DAMAGE TO THE ANTI-MCCANNS?

She does seem to have 'reality' issues.

So, there was very little difference between what the Sun published and what Hutton said. Why am I not surprised?

So much for all Hutton's shrieks of last night -


So the demand is that I place all details of my conversations, emails, drafts, etc, ie. the entire extent of my evidence, should a libel trial ever arise, on an open public forum? Indeed, get myself involved in a detailed discussion about what if any action I should take, what my proposals are and how I should go about it.

'Libel trial' my ar@e.

Just more fantasies.

Re: THE SUN NEWSPAPER - Cristobell Interview 31.1.15
Post Freedom Today a

I believe that she is in contact with Martin D about the misquotes.

Good luck with that one, sweetcheeks. You take the Murdoch shilling, you lose the right to whine if you don't like the way your story gets printed.

Oh dear, never mind.