LEYLAND INQUEST - SUICIDE VERDICT

http://www.stopthemyths.info/viewtopic.php?f=149&t=7567


The shame Leyland felt
Postby Chinagirl » Sat Mar 21, 2015 6:07 am

That's a very good post. The haters need to fact the fact that Leyland ended her life because she was ASHAMED that her family and neighbours had found out about her secret hobby.

She had a chance for a full interview with Brunt to explain her views - something they all claim they want. But when push came to shove, she actually couldn't defend her behaviour.

The screeching haters really do need to take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Another one:

http://www.stopthemyths.info/viewtopic.php?f=149&t=7566


Re: Accosted by Sonia Poulton


RL was worried about facing a man who has a rap sheet longer than Laffin's shopping list for booze; a man who threatens people with an image of himself holding an automatic weapon; a man who admitted that if he hadn't won the lottery he would have carried out an armed robbery and dealt with anyone who got in his way by shooting them in the knees; a man who:

Before their Lottery win, Karen, the mother of his two boys and a girl, had pleaded with Lee to give up his life of crime.

He recalls: "I lost it with her completely. I reached under the bed where the sawn-off shotgun was. It was always kept loaded.

"I pointed it in her face. I told her, 'Shut up'. I don't think I'd have pulled the trigger on Karen. She said, 'Go on, then. Shoot me!'


RL was worried about facing Ann-Kristine whatsherface; a woman who wrote on Chris Spivey's blog entry about the Boston Bombings being fake, and the injured and maimed being actors:

Ann-Kristine Westwood

Apr 22, 2013 @ 06:43:57

I can smell the bullshit from over here in Europe! This is an outrageous fraud . Makes me ashamed to be human. Hope the TRUTH prevails one day. x

Poulton and her vigilantes give every impression of being the dregs of the gutter, frankly.

This is a good description of them, though:


Surrounded by the Ghoul, the Bad and the Fugly, who in their right mind would go anywhere near them?

If Poulton keeps up her harrassment of members of the public, I can see the REAL police being called in.

Hounder:


whatsupdoc wrote:
Twitter is acting up a bit this morning but I have been able to tweet Sonia and get a reply.

She says NO evidence was presented in Court such as cans, photos etc.

And why would there be? It was a coroner's court, not a freak show to entertain slavering ghouls like them.

Oh, and if they ever stopped ranting and screeching trash, they would know which so-called crime story turned out to be a HOAX. And a pretty nasty one at that.

Which Hoax Crime was that, Bonny? I must have missed it.

Remember all those gruesome, lurid tales about supposed satanic abuse in Hampstead that the haters were all drooling over recently? Speculating, in their usual frenzy of one-handed typing?

The whole thing was a pack of lies.

One report:

http://www.hamhigh.co.uk/news/crime-court/hampstead_school_at_centre_of_false_satanic_cult_allegation_welcomes_judge_s_ruling_1_4001462

Please note, the internet ghouls that enjoy debating abuse - to say how awful it is, of course, perish the thought they should be getting off on it! - made things ten times worse for the innocent people involved by muck-spreading total fabrications.

The REAL abuser was their deranged harpy of a mother, and her boyfriend, who drugged the kids, etc:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/11483750/Evil-mother-tortured-children-into-telling-police-their-father-was-leader-of-Satanic-sex-cult.html

to get at the children's father.

There never was a 'Satanic ring'. There was just an evil witch of a woman and her lover, a pack of lies, and morons on the internet that were only too happy to believe the evil witch.

Oh, and interfered with the investigation being done by the REAL police.

Good job the REAL police didn't listen to the internet morons, or the poor children would have been left with the evil witch and her abusing lover.

Countless websites sprang up proclaiming support for Draper and her children. Police were deployed to protect worried parents and children at the gates of the school.
The judge said that four million people had viewed material about the case online, many of whom had “a sexual interest in children”. Several of those implicated had received menacing emails and phone calls at all hours of the day or night.

The handiwork of internet morons, no doubt.

Jim Gamble ‏@JimGamble_INEQE 2 hrs2 hours ago
@IamIanHitchings @skymartinbrunt wud her allies, who encouraged her, hv done so had they known the complexity & vulnerabilities in her life?

Well said by Jim Gamble. Where were all Leyland's internet so-called friends when she needed them? The ones that are doing so much screeching now to distract from their own guilt in her death?

Ah, that one. At McDonalds and all. I don't believe any of this shite anymore. Satanic Abuse and no one noticed while it was going on?

It was very obviously bollox, Sabot, though what lay behind it was a matter for the REAL police. That didn't stop the Usual Suspects dribbling with excitement about it, and speculating.

I am not sure which is worse, that they have sewers instead of minds, or that they're so gullible and stupid.

The famously-stupid yoyo rants:


If I were her family, I would complain about the coroner mishandling of the inquest or I would take the issue up with a lawyer on how, on the basis of Brunt depositions can he be taken to court, for a variety or reasons namely unfairly targeting her, neglecting her call for help, blatant disregard for her safety and life, intrusion of her privacy and invasion of her human right, for pushing her to the edge etc.

Look, fool, her family were so little concerned, none of them even attended the inquest. Leyland had tried to kill herself previously, and had a history of mental health problems, so they probably weren't entirely surprised when this happened.

Brunt did NOTHING to her, quite the opposite. SHE asked him into her home, he gave her his cellphone number in case she was concerned about anything. Only an utter cretin could try to twist that into 'invasion of privacy'.

If they want to see who holds a large part of the blame, they only have to look in mirrors.

Who was it that encouraged her to be abusive and vile?

It was them.

Who was it that turned on her, slagged her off and accused her of being in the pay of 'Team McCann', whatever they imagine that is?

It was them.

Adults would stop scapegoating Brunt and face up to their own role in this squalid little tragedy. But one thing the haters have never been is adult.

Jean-Pierre.t50 wrote:Is her boyfriend still trying to look hard posing with a ladies shotgun? (no offence to ladies btw - its just that it has the merit of being easier to handle for those who cant cope with the recoil of a conventional shotgun).

Thank you J-P.  I know what you mean, I can only comfortably handle a 22.

Poultry is a complete and utter bully.  I reckon she gets off on that.  

Her face is hard and ugly her voice is hard and harsh, so all in all - offensive.  

Don't see Sky keeping her on for too much longer.  

In her head, she's probably still hanging around with gangsta rappers and getting payback on anyone wot disrespects her, innit, and all that bullsh*t. And fried one brain cell too many along the way.

She really is awful, but in many ways, the perfect figurehead for a shower of moronic internet vigilantes.

Yes!  She is the perfect figurehead for that moronic shower of vigilantes.  Way to go!  

The grubby, worn jeans! The beer guts! The vacant expression on the Cher Tribute Act's face! So that's what a Ghouls' Day Out looks like.

Father Jack @urcrazytoo · 21h 21 hours ago
@SoniaPoulton Your mob of loons see conspiracies everywhere. Coroner, police, pathologist, toxicologist, son, friends all in on it?

Isn't that photo memorable?  Central Casting would most likely like to use them for a lynch mob scene.  Makeup would only need to have their teeth blacked out.......

Cher's mummy forgot to tell her to tuck her vest into her trousers. Oh, and wash her hair occasionally.

Now that nutter Hall that makes DVDs with Bennett has joined in, desperate for attention.

In my view whole thing is a psy-op orchestrated probably my Murdoch and MI5.

Oh don't be so effing stupid! There's no mystery about it, it's just a sad, squalid, familiar tragedy.

It's the 21st century version of the vicar's wife being caught sending poison pen letters.

Leyland's family knew her better than anyone, and none of them seem greatly bothered, not even the son she wasn't estranged from.

Though he must feel dreadful for not getting help for her in time, not realising she was going to succeed in killing herself this time.

 They don't half think they are important and ultra clever, don't they?

I mean....come on........

http://www.pressreader.com/uk/daily-mail/20150321/282157879736104/TextView



Note what her son in LA says - no wonder the pretendy 'court reporter' wouldn't repeat it.

In the written statement, he added that his mother displayed 'erratic and sometimes vicious behaviour' and could alienate those close to her.

I suspect that is the answer as to why none of her UK family went to the inquest, not even the estranged son.

Now, do Poulton and the rest of the ghouls really want to add to this family's pain by exploiting the death of a disturbed woman for their own ends?

Oh, silly me - the likes of them will do it in a heartbeat!

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3004290/Sky-TV-reporter-devastated-suicide-McCann-Twitter-troll-days-exposed-inquest-hears.html

Very interesting to see the Mail comments are supportive, generally, of Martin Brunt. And that people simply do not like trolls.

Hounder:

I really think Brenda's family need, if possible, to seek advice about it all.

Why? They knew the real Leyland; most of them weren't even on speaking terms with her. Why aren't they paying the slightest bit of attention to what her non-estranged son had to say?

Hell mend these morons if they try to milk this for their own ends, they've done more than enough damage already with their mindless hate campaigns.

That Hounder might be correct.  After all they have form for hounding and being horrid so they might have to seek to stop them?

I hope they don't need to.