LEYLAND INQUEST - SUICIDE VERDICT

Well, now we know why she was estranged from most of her family. So why would any of them wish to pursue this?

The haters, and YouTubers on the make, would be well advised to drop this, IMO. But if they keep up their harrassment, I can see the Leyland family, and others, calling in the police and lawyers to stop them.

Boboty ‏@robyatkins 7m7 minutes ago
@fiorifan @__StuartB__ @SkyNews @skymartinbrunt Just curious. 'Hoax' tweet meaningless. Journos supposed to know how to communicate #mccann

It's not meaningless if you bother to read the papers occasionally. There are actually things happening in the world that don't involve the word 'McCann'.

Yes, there are!

100% in agreement with you Bonny.  Any sane person could see that happening if they keep this up.

They really are utterly ignorant, blind to anything that doesn't suit their own sick agenda. They know nothing about the law - nothing about anything, really. But still think they are entitled to spread their stupid drivel everywhere, to meddle in matters that are none of their concern, have no relevance to their lives, and that they are too damned STUPID to understand, anyway.

Sonia Poulton @SoniaPoulton · 3h 3 hours ago
@DaSteelMan yesterday, so far as I could see, was a formality. We are requesting more info from Leicester Coroners.

Evil b*tch just doesn't care about pouring salt in the Leyland family's wounds, does she?

No one could expect her to have an ounce of class in her body.

If Poulton and her vigilantes start hassling the Leyland family, then quite frankly, I hope the family throw the book at her.

One gets the distinct impression that the family had quite enough to deal with when Leyland was alive, what with mental hospitals and suicide bids. And it simply is NOT natural to be estranged from your own flesh and blood, unless there is something very wrong with you.

Leyland was fighting with the neighbours, posting some pretty vile stuff online - even the non-estranged son said she could be 'vicious'. And this is who the haters are trying to turn into a martyr?

I really don't think so.

Maybe that's why they're all screeching and shrieking? Because the inquest demonstrated that this helpless, gentle lady they'd conjured up bore NO resemblance to the real Leyland?

I really do wonder if they can even think in any way like a normal person?

How many of them have mental health issues, or alcohol or substance abuse issues?

Interesting to read some more views on this matter on a neutral site:

http://forums.digitalspy.co.uk/showthread.php?t=2060529

Sky news reporter devastated

Generally, not much sympathy for Leyland, beyond feeling sorry for someone that was mentally ill.

lily wrote:I really do wonder if they can even think in any way like a normal person?

How many of them have mental health issues, or alcohol or substance abuse issues?

Thing is, Lily, many of us made certain assessments about Leyland, just from the nasty stuff she was posting, which have been borne out by events. And we've all seen bizarre behaviour from many of the leading haters - just look at Butler, and how shamelessly she's come back having grown a new head!

I suspect it's their own horridness that makes them cling together, and give themselves mealy-mouthed names like 'Truthseekers' and 'sceptics'. And why they cry and whine when reality intrudes and shows them as what they really are.

A bunch of foul-mouthed, fouled-minded, whackjob obsessives.

bb1 wrote:

lily wrote:I really do wonder if they can even think in any way like a normal person?

How many of them have mental health issues, or alcohol or substance abuse issues?

Thing is, Lily, many of us made certain assessments about Leyland, just from the nasty stuff she was posting, which have been borne out by events. And we've all seen bizarre behaviour from many of the leading haters - just look at Butler, and how shamelessly she's come back having grown a new head!

I suspect it's their own horridness that makes them cling together, and give themselves mealy-mouthed names like 'Truthseekers' and 'sceptics'. And why they cry and whine when reality intrudes and shows them as what they really are.

A bunch of foul-mouthed, fouled-minded, whackjob obsessives.

Good description.  

http://www.stopthemyths.info/viewtopic.php?f=149&t=7235&start=475


Re: Sonia Poulton - clearly not what most call a real journa
Postby tigerloaf » Sat Mar 21, 2015 5:15 pm

More evidence of Sonia Poulton being outside the world of real journalism?

I hear that this woman didn't manage to seat herself with the professionals at the Brenda Leyland Inquest. No credentials presumably or why else would this self-promoting biddy choose to sit with the plebs? She has only recently been pretending to the fools who hang on her every word just how well connected she is, but apparently not so well-connected to actually have the credentials to present herself as a real journalist. Odd that don't you think?

ps another who would not have got a toe in that journalists section is that bouncing, drug-addict Hutton no matter how many times she bleats that having a few letters printed in her local weekly rag makes her a 'journalist'.

Well, as everyone bar her pet thugs and vigilantes runs away from the screeching harpy....

Can you blame them?  

Incidentally, why are the haters all spitting, well, hate, at Martin Brunt? He seems to have bent over backwards with Leyland. It wasn't him that named her - the first time I saw her name, it was posted by another hater.

Then the Mail picked up the story, yet there's no criticism anywhere of the Mail - and they WERE intrusive.

Several people spoke to her after Brunt, including her own son, who didn't think anything was seriously amiss. When he then spoke to the estranged part of the family, they simply assumed Leyland had gone off for a few days.

So, was Brunt supposed to be psychic? Or are the haters all furious because the REAL Leyland bore no resemblance to this shy, polite, timid, elderly woman they'd invented for their narrative?

http://www.stopthemyths.info/viewtopic.php?f=149&t=7566&start=25

Randomleigh, who got so much hassle from Poulton yesterday:


Actually there's still something niggling at me, who was John, the guy who approached me in the foyer after the inquest? I don't remember seeing him inside the courtroom, but then every time I looked to my left all I could see and HEAR was Ann-Kristine and that other vile troll she was with, so avoiding looking in that direction. To my right was a lady and her husband and that was all ???



Is he the beer belly in the middle, mayhap?

Do you know, when you see the likes of that shower near courtrooms, it's usually as the accused. Especially in the pet thug's case.

Well her boyfriend does have previous.  

Who is the female to the left with the the gut?

We can write the script for them these days, with the aid of all the extra information they think we won't find out.
We already had the basics before the final inquest.

Mental Heath Issues. Estranged from family. Suicide.

Spin that to read: Martin Brunt and McCann Supporters drove her to her death by relentlessly hounding a poor old pensioner who only wanted Justice for Madeleine.

Was she old enough to get her pension?

Yes, she got in before the rules were changed, Lily - but just.

Thank you, Bonny.  Who is the woman in the black and white getup?

http://www.nidirect.gov.uk/calculating-your-state-pension-age

Pensions.

The older woman, no idea, Lily. Maybe she's their Responsible Adult?

The Cher Tribute Act with the greasy hair is one of the twittertw@ts.

Thanks, Bonny - appreciate it.

She looks like she may be their responsible party.  Heaven knows they need one.

The other one looks like a bit of a battle ax, just like Poulton.   They all do go together well.....

This is one of those shouting-across-the-internet things:

http://www.stopthemyths.info/viewtopic.php?f=149&t=7566&start=25

No, seems Mr Potbelly in the Middle isn't 'John'. Must have been some other pet thug of Poulton's.

Seems Poulton has no shortage of pet thugs.  She must like them with no class - like her.