SNAKE OIL SALESMAN - A US VIEW OF B$OWN

http://exposingthemyths.blogspot.com/2011/07/pat-brown-owes-kate-mccann-apology.html

That's a pretty spectacular LIE, isn't it?

A Lie oft repeated. Not only did The McCanns beg for the return of Madeleine, why would anyone assume that they hadn't?

zante03 kim ming
@
@annembremner @ProfilerPatB is suing parents of abducted child Madeleine #McCann. Is it true you are representing her?
2 minutes ago

Let's see what the answer is, if any....

bb1 wrote:zante03 kim ming
@
@annembremner @ProfilerPatB is suing parents of abducted child Madeleine #McCann. Is it true you are representing her?
2 minutes ago

Let's see what the answer is, if any....

she won't answer me.

I would love to know what's really going on, as opposed to what B$own claims is going on.

I know Ms Bremner had that embarrasing DUI, but looking at her work, she's no pitchforker; I just don't see her getting involved with B$own.

Just think about what all of this has done for Bennett. It's wot keeps me going.

Bennett has been strangely silent on Pat Brown. But everything that has happened reecently has been very bad news for him. Including the Prout case. The Leverson Enquiry. Being "dissed" by NSY.

Poor Bennett. It could not happen to nicer chap.

sans_souci wrote:Bennett has been strangely silent on Pat Brown. But everything that has happened reecently has been very bad news for him. Including the Prout case. The Leverson Enquiry. Being "dissed" by NSY.

Poor Bennett. It could not happen to nicer chap.

I bet he won't be so keen to tell us what happens to him. Pity really, I was hoping for a bit of a chortle.

This is of course quite apart from the various actions being brought against him. And that he has caved into all the demands. (strange - he said he was confident that he could justify every word. And was keen to get the McCanns into court - what has changed?).

Odd he disappears, just as B$own joins his site - and why were there no warm welcomes from him for this new star addition to the Hounders and Truthseekers?

That was odd.

In passing - why is the content of his site now bearing a strong resemblance to Textusa's blog? Post after unreadable post of conspiraloon rubbish about nuclear X rays, and b*tching about calendars.

Why does she keep doing this, I wonder? Her words are all over the internet - but she keeps trying to pretend that she didn't say what she actually did.

They are her own words, she owns them - she can tell the judge what she meant to say...

She said this in October 2007:

Criminal Profiling Topic of the Day: Why Does Kate McCann not make a Plea to Maddie's Captor?

In the recent interview with the parents of Madeleine McCann, Kate McCann states she believes Madeleine is alive, essentially unharmed, and being cared for in someone's home. If Kate really believes this, then there is a glaring omission in her use of the media.

It is extremely abnormal for a mother who thinks her child has simply been taken by some lonely person and being cared for in a nice, little house to not reach out to that person with a message, over and over again. After all, this would be one way to get your child back. Here is how that kind of message usually goes:

“If you have Madeleine, please return her to her family. I know you may love having Madeleine with you but her Mommy, her Daddy, and her sister and brother are in great pain being separated from her. Please, please, let us have her back. Please take her to a public location where there are lots of people around like a McDonalds or a library or a hospital and drop her off. You can do this anonymously so you do not have to worry about being noticed. We are not interested in having any action taking against you; we just want our little girl at home with us. Thank you for taking good care of her and please send Madeleine back to us.”

But, instead, no plea to her captor? Very, very bizarre.

Which remind me: I have never heard of an expert telling parents to be unemotional in a plea to a kidnapper so as not to amuse them. Personally, I have to say most pleas are a waste of time and will have no effect on a psychopathic kidnapper. But, if one wanted to make a plea because one really believed the abducted child was not already dead or being tortured in a dungeon, that the child was with some nutty woman who just had to have the pretty little thing, then an emotional plea would be just the thing to try to jog the woman’s conscience to return the child.

======================

Another nasty, mendacious piece. I assume she is trying to spin over and over again into continually?

Kate McCann did make appeals over and over again, yet B$own says:

But, instead, no plea to her captor? Very, very bizarre.

And what would she know about what experts on crime think, anyway? It's not as if she is one.....

This is like her trying to spin her outrage into not being able to buy alcohol at breakfast time into a 'joke'; she seems to do this rather a lot when she is challenged on her own words.

This sounds to me like a case of being found out and trying to talk her way out of it.

Does she think that The McCanns should still be pleading on a weekly basis after all this time? Is this what she means by Continual?

Just more weasel words from B$own from what I can see, Sabot - in 2007, she accused the McCanns of not making appeals when no fewer than FOUR had already been made.

That is the sort of falsehood any judge will be looking at.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/the-tv-host-who-thinks-everybodys-guilty-2367382.html

"Grace is the Madame DeFarge of American justice," says Jonathan Turley, a professor of law at George Washington University. "She refuses to undo her knitting even in the face of reasonable doubt or compelling evidence. Her snarling, retributive style is the draw for a very sad and very angry portion of our population."

=========================

I actually thought of Grace and B$own when I was watching this episode of Leverage a couple of days ago:

http://www.tv.com/shows/leverage/the-three-days-of-the-hunter-job-1273624/

The Leverage team get involved in fraudulent newscasts, when they try use fake government secrets to con newscaster Monica Hunter, who likes to demonize innocent people and then hide behind the network.

bb1 wrote:Just more weasel words from B$own from what I can see, Sabot - in 2007, she accused the McCanns of not making appeals when no fewer than FOUR had already been made.

That is the sort of falsehood any judge will be looking at.

But what does she think now? How many times does she think is the right number?

She's twisting and spinning like a whirligig now:

ProfilerPatB PAT BROWN
#OutofContext. "But, instead NO plea to her captor," was made in that ONE interview I was speaking of. #WhyIDon'tArguewithHaters #McCann

Give it up, woman, we can all read. And so can judges.

ETA, it is called:


Criminal Profiling Topic of the Day: Why Does Kate McCann not make a Plea to Maddie's Captor?

B$own wrote that when no fewer than FOUR pleas had been made.

I suspect she is used to applause from her trailer trash fanbase, Jayelles, who never question a word she says, let along bring her own words back to haunt her.

B$own is totally out of her depths now; if she is carrying on like this about being reminded of her own words on the internet, what kind of showing is she going to make in a courtroom?

Jayelles wrote:OMG talk about desperation?

As you say, the judge can read, so can we.

FOUR direct appeals had been made by the time she wrote the article entitled "Why does Kate McCann not make an appeal to Maddie's Captors?"

She can spin and spin. She will only succeed in making herself dizzy.

I have to say that I hope she does a bit more damage to herself than that. Beachy Head comes to mind.

Ah, and her of the "Time to be Brave" fame. Whatever happened to her? The one who was a Copper in England and America at the same time.

bb1 wrote:I suspect she is used to applause from her trailer trash fanbase, Jayelles, who never question a word she says, let along bring her own words back to haunt her.

B$own is totally out of her depths now; if she is carrying on like this about being reminded of her own words on the internet, what kind of showing is she going to make in a courtroom?

Those dastardly McCanns have done it again. Another career ruined. Take care all ye who enter here. Karma's a Beachy.

It is strange isnt it. How many lives and carreers have the so casually ruined. Was it "Blondie" who blamed them for a relationship breakdown. And Amaral losing his pension, career, and house(s). Thank god Sophia stuck with him. Or is it "is stuck with him". And all those pitchforkers in Therapy. Bennett getting into hot water. Nigel whatever his name is having to eke out a living on benefits and donations from Truthseekers.

And now Brown Happily minding her own business, trashing others reputations and pretneding to be a "profiler" just like they have on the telly, and suddenly "wham" - the McCanns have the effrontery to say "excuse me, this is not right" to the distributors of her self publsihed book and invite them to withdraw it. This is bloody disgraceful!

sans_souci wrote:It is strange isnt it. How many lives and carreers have the so casually ruined. Was it "Blondie" who blamed them for a relationship breakdown. And Amaral losing his pension, career, and house(s). Thank god Sophia stuck with him. Or is it "is stuck with him". And all those pitchforkers in Therapy. Bennett getting into hot water. Nigel whatever his name is having to eke out a living on benefits and donations from Truthseekers.

And now Brown Happily minding her own business, trashing others reputations and pretneding to be a "profiler" just like they have on the telly, and suddenly "wham" - the McCanns have the effrontery to say "excuse me, this is not right" to the distributors of her self publsihed book and invite them to withdraw it. This is bloody disgraceful!

It is, it is, Sans. A bloody disgrace. But I have got a nasty suspicion that it is going to get much worse than that for Brown by the time it's done. She might even be thankful for the publicity she got when Amazon chucked out her skanky Leaflet. She should have taken the money and run.

Although I have to say that I am quite looking forward to her comments when Gonc loses The Libel Trial. She can try to spin that one, if she dares.

Ah yes. The old parallel universe ploy....

sans_souci wrote:It is strange isnt it. How many lives and carreers have the so casually ruined. Was it "Blondie" who blamed them for a relationship breakdown. And Amaral losing his pension, career, and house(s). Thank god Sophia stuck with him. Or is it "is stuck with him". And all those pitchforkers in Therapy. Bennett getting into hot water. Nigel whatever his name is having to eke out a living on benefits and donations from Truthseekers.

And now Brown Happily minding her own business, trashing others reputations and pretneding to be a "profiler" just like they have on the telly, and suddenly "wham" - the McCanns have the effrontery to say "excuse me, this is not right" to the distributors of her self publsihed book and invite them to withdraw it. This is bloody disgraceful!

And don't forget how many of them have been driven to er, 'self-medicating' by the McCanns.

VileViv, rarely sober; LaffinThug, gibberer extra-ordinaire. And of course, emu half-cut, who nightly spams any site that will let her with abuse about monkeys, bananas, planks, w*ankers, snakes, etc, finishing with instructions to OTHER people to go to the doctors

So, now B$own is an expert on Norwegian law - why doesn't she just STFU when she has no idea what she is talking about?

In case she doesn't know

NORWAY ISN'T PART OF THE US. NEITHER IS ENGLAND, NOR ANY OF THE NATIONS WHICH MAKE UP THE UK. PORTUGAL ISN'T PART OF THE US EITHER.

Stupid woman.

She really is twisting and spinning, isn't she?

http://exposingthemyths.blogspot.com/2011/11/pat-brown-should-apologise-not-spin.html