OK, so who is the Carter Ruck Mole on haverns?

He's just another wannabe with a blog, Sabot. But naturally, as he claims to know Secret Stuff about Gerry McCann's younger days, they are all lapping it up - you know how gullible they are.

bb1 wrote:He's just another wannabe with a blog, Sabot. But naturally, as he claims to know Secret Stuff about Gerry McCann's younger days, they are all lapping it up - you know how gullible they are.

Do they have any proof that he is who he says he is? Or will any old Dickhead do? Not that I expect them to check, heaven forbid, they might find out that he is just another liar.
Dr. Gerald McCann is known to be quite brilliant in his field and will no doubt go on to alter the face of Heart Disease, and he will save many lives. Not that any of them will subject themselves to his expertise. But that's fine by me. Gerry won't make the same distinction that I might make when it comes to one of them.

See Bennett is now imaging Masonic Trolls are everywhere....

Well, well, well, how fascinating. The moment someone even suggests that John Major might be a Freemason, into the forum jumps a new member, who suddenly joins - after Madeleine has been missing for over five years - to pour scorn on the idea that there has ever been such a thing as undue Masonic influence exerted by senior members of this secretive craft.



Someone talking sense - always a rarity on a hate site - isn't nearly as odd as the 'LuzLady' troll who just happened to be staying near the Smethurst family in PDL, and was quite happy to stalk and harrass them on behalf of Bennett.

Or are Official Trolls and Socks different?

Every time the senile prat starts on with the Masons, it reinforces my opinion that he was either turned down for membership or never asked in the first place - or maybe he was expelled after his fleecing of the old lady? Those of my Mason friends I have mentioned it to, agree. And if John Major is or is not a Mason, what business is it of a failed git like bentit? LL

But they do seem to have a large number of New Posters who suddenly appear to slag off, well, anything Pro McCann. That's alright, is it? Nothing odd about that?
And who cares if someone is a Free Mason? My brother is, and so is one of my sons. And neither of them have managed to keep me out of trouble.

That Havern's Site is the joke of The Internet. And Bennett is the biggest joke of all. One might wonder if he really wants to get bumped off. And I can think of a few who might oblige. But none of them are Free Masons.

I suspect he was never asked in the first place, LL. I also suspect his late father would naturally have been a mason, as he had a respected position in society, and served both his community and his country.

But, not only has Bennett never made a success of anything, he hasn't even managed to serve the community - he's generally managed to make matters worse and turn anything he touches into merde.

So, Bennett may have thought he would almost automatically have been asked, due to his never-ending efforts to achieve solid, middle-class respectability. But as all he has ever succeeded in doing is looking like a cad and a bounder, to use old-fashioned terms, he was never asked to join Harlow Lodge. Or any other Lodge.

Lamplighter wrote:Every time the senile prat starts on with the Masons, it reinforces my opinion that he was either turned down for membership or never asked in the first place - or maybe he was expelled after his fleecing of the old lady? Those of my Mason friends I have mentioned it to, agree. And if John Major is or is not a Mason, what business is it of a failed git like bentit? LL

Got it in one, LL. Although I think he was probably expelled. But then The Free Masons wouldn't talk about that because it would break their code of behaviour, which Bennett very well knows. But it is a fact that they don't condone crooked dealings or dishonourable practices.

That Havern's Site is the joke of The Internet.

Isn't it just, Sabot? Anyone who thinks it has, as of right this minute, no fewer than

1861 registered users

really should stay away from Nigerian princes and people selling London Bridge - 186 genuine members is nearer the mark.

Admin socks, Bennett socks, Official Support Trolls, Official WUMs, employees of Carter Ruck....Bennett's Goncalol Tribute Site is a joke from start to finish.

Sabot wrote:

Lamplighter wrote:Every time the senile prat starts on with the Masons, it reinforces my opinion that he was either turned down for membership or never asked in the first place - or maybe he was expelled after his fleecing of the old lady? Those of my Mason friends I have mentioned it to, agree. And if John Major is or is not a Mason, what business is it of a failed git like bentit? LL

Got it in one, LL. Although I think he was probably expelled. But then The Free Masons wouldn't talk about that because it would break their code of behaviour, which Bennett very well knows. But it is a fact that they don't condone crooked dealings or dishonourable practices.

No, they don't condone bad behaviour. And people like solicitors, bankers, lawyers etc are usually sought after as they will have good contacts for future fund-raising and charity work. LL

bb1 wrote:I suspect he was never asked in the first place, LL. I also suspect his late father would naturally have been a mason, as he had a respected position in society, and served both his community and his country.

But, not only has Bennett never made a success of anything, he hasn't even managed to serve the community - he's generally managed to make matters worse and turn anything he touches into merde.

So, Bennett may have thought he would almost automatically have been asked, due to his never-ending efforts to achieve solid, middle-class respectability. But as all he has ever succeeded in doing is looking like a cad and a bounder, to use old-fashioned terms, he was never asked to join Harlow Lodge. Or any other Lodge.

It isn't that difficult, Bonny. My Father was invited, and there was no one more working class than he was. But he was and honourable man. He declined for reasons that he never saw fit to discuss with me. But he was a Celt of his own Tribe.

There always lurks the suggestion that Free Masons help each other in business, and I don't know if this is true. But for certain sure they would not recommend a useless idiot who was no good at his job. That would just defeat the entire object.

bb1 wrote:That Havern's Site is the joke of The Internet.

Isn't it just, Sabot? Anyone who thinks it has, as of right this minute, no fewer than

1861 registered users

really should stay away from Nigerian princes and people selling London Bridge - 186 genuine members is nearer the mark.

Admin socks, Bennett socks, Official Support Trolls, Official WUMs, employees of Carter Ruck....Bennett's Goncalol Tribute Site is a joke from start to finish.

As many as that, Bonny? They don't all post very often, do they. And most of the views are from people like me who want to see what insanity they will come up with next. And then we go back for another look to make sure that they actually are insane.

I hope the assorted moles are taking note of the fact that the hounders are now starting on Sarah Payne's family.

I am sure the CEOPS mole/s will be; it's scarcely a secret that sex offenders have been known to smear their victims.

Getting worried about something, are they? Just asking, because threads seem to be vanishing overnight.

What a dilema. To leave Posts up, or to delete them? If they leave them they run the risk of being sued or prosecuted, and if they delete them they offend their hard core supporters.
No balls, obviously. But if they are so sure that they are right why do none of them stand by what they say?

Would that be for the same reason Bennett always folds? They/he know they are posting a load of obscene lies and filthy inventions about innocent people, but enjoy it so much, they can't stop?

They just whine and claim it's their Yuman Rite to fabricate disgusting stories?

Do you suppose Bennett's revelation that he takes winter holidays in the Canaries will affect the COLD fundraising for his legal bills?

Oh, silly me, of course it won't! The Hounders and forkers will consider it an honour to hand over their hard-earned cash to him because of his harrassment of the McCanns and others!

I bet they'd have something to say if Kate and Gerry went to the Canaries. Oh My Yes.

I take it, Sabot, that you have no desire to hand over your hard-earned cash to people who boast about having tens of thousands in the bank, and take winter holidays in the Canaries?

No, me neither.

Just as I don't feel the need to hand over money to wastrels who don't pay their debts, but p*ss their ill-gotten gains up against the wall on parties, fireworks and bling.

I have to wonder what goes through their heads, Bonny. Bennett cavorting half way round Europe and The World on a regular basis, Amaral up to his neck in debt while behaving like a Mafia Boss, long before The McCanns were ever heard of, and still they throw money at them. They never mention the lifestyles of either Amaral or Bennett, but they must know what these two have been getting up to. How do they excuse this behaviour? How do they excuse Amaral deliberately defrauding his Brother?
The McCanns have never done anything like this, and there is nothing in their past lives to suggest that they ever would.
I just don't get it.

Oh, look what's surfaced:

Anthony Bennett ‏@zampos
#McCann v Bennett trial in Nov? Michael Forrester at Legal Services Commission HQ trying to see if I come under Civil or Criminal Legal Aid

Still stalling, is he?

I would say he is, Bonny.

Surely the Barrister would know the answer to Bennett's situation? Why the doubt?

Yes, one would indeed expect a barrister to know, Lily. So, Bennett is up to something - throwing dust in Legal Aid eyes?

So, he's whinging on about CR's costs again - he should have thought about that before he so gaily ran up their bill, sniggering because his cult thought the Find Madeleine fund was paying them.


There is no way I can match fees like that from my resources.

So, how does he propose to pay them, then? He hasn't a leg to stand on, and this is between him and the High Court, which he treated with such contempt.

Oh well, I am sure someone who can afford winter holidays in the Canaries shouldn't have too much trouble, really.

I'm with you. Bonny, in that he should have thought about this before setting out on his despicable course of action.

Maybe he thought he would be let off on everything as he's so special?

I am not going to forget Bennett finding it so amusing to run up Carter Ruck's Bill because he thought The Find Madeleine Fund was paying, but I don't suppose Carter Ruck will either.
What sort of barstard tries to deplete a search fund for a missing child?