SUN - Hutton admits she trolls 'for the buzz'

SafariSara ‏@SafariSara 2h2 hours ago
So have we been able to work out WHICH version of Mutton's "when the story broke" is true & which is a LIE? #McCann



Tut tut.

You know, this whole business of Hutton being desperate to get in the Sun, then boasting about trolling, getting a buzz out of 'squishing' people, etc - it's just so vulgar.

She belongs on Jeremy Kyle, or some other car-crash TV show, imo.

Competition time! Who said, a couple of weeks ago, following Poulton's request for an idiot, I mean Truthseeker, to talk to the media:


The Sonia is different as it is solely McCann related. I have been assured that I will not be portrayed as a troll

But she said it all herself. The Reporter didn't do it. He must have thought all his birthdays had come at once.

From that hateblogger Lazz-thingy, a long article about Hutton's antics ending with an excellent question.

An afterthought - Why would Hutton not have passed a copy of the 'script' to be published in the Sun, to the Admin at the forum which she is a part, as whatever she had signed up to with the Sun was clearly going to have a huge affect on them, their reputation?

Because her words WEREN'T altered, mayhap? She just opened her mouth and switched what little brain she has, off? And out it all poured?

Re: THE SUN NEWSPAPER TODAY - Cristobell Interview 31.1.15
Post Cristobell Today at 11:00 pm

So the demand is that I place all details of my conversations, emails, drafts, etc, ie. the entire extent of my evidence, should a libel trial ever arise, on an open public forum? Indeed, get myself involved in a detailed discussion about what if any action I should take, what my proposals are and how I should go about it.

That the publishing of such materials and the discussion of the evidence will immediately rule out any possibility of my getting an apology, a retraction or a withdrawal of said offending statements, matters not - it will give us all something to talk about.

Goodnight

I have to say that from the first day I looked in on the #McCann tag on Twitter it was obvious that some of the anti McCanns were stupid. But there is stupid and then there is Mrs Hutton.

I've not seen any of the hate squad do anything quite so funny before as Mrs Hutton did sitting down with a Sun journalist to describe in flowing language just what a needy but horrible person she really is. Could any journalist have ever wished for a more attention-seeking idiot to interview?

I can imagine the questions leading her into opening up about herself, about her anger and about the way she felt while she was becoming the latest anti-McCann trollop to be outed in the media as a nasty piece of work.

What kind of fool when trying to prove that other people are nasty describes herself as a bit of a bitch who loves waging war on the internet because it saves her kicking the dog? Well Hutton did. And she went on to tell us that depression was her route into the hate camp. She needed others who were bored and lonely and needed an outlet for her sick fantasies. The McCanns became that outlet. Ever since then Mrs Hutton has got a buzz from being online and fighting and fighting other people in some sick kind of computer game.

I despair that this woman isn't in a mental institution of some sort. Deprived as a kid, locked up when her mother abandoned her, she tried taking her anger out on the nuns and home that looked after her. When that failed and the Judge told her to take one she needed another target and up popped the McCanns who have been the subject of her sickness ever since.

At least we all know now just how she sees her role in the game. Its a game she needs to feed her cravings for attention, for an audience and for company in her loneliness. It is a drug to her, giing her a buzz when she has kicked somebody where it hurts (well its better than kicking a dog). Where is the woman's family? Have they become estranged I wonder as Brenda Leyland's had? Is that why Rosalind Hutton needs her online fantasies and hate friends to console her?

But there is stupid and then there is Mrs Hutton.

Greenink, this has been the best ever. Bar none. I cannot even begin to think about what she imagined was going to happen when she spoke to a Sun journo.

And - Poulton must have known all along that the interview was with the Sun, of all papers. Hutton was stitched up like a kipper - a very willing kipper, but a kipper nevertheless.

Perhaps she should have remembered that old saying about ladies only getting their names in the paper twice? Once when they entered the world and once when they left it?

bb1 wrote:From that hateblogger Lazz-thingy, a long article about Hutton's antics ending with an excellent question.

An afterthought - Why would Hutton not have passed a copy of the 'script' to be published in the Sun, to the Admin at the forum which she is a part, as whatever she had signed up to with the Sun was clearly going to have a huge affect on them, their reputation?

Because her words WEREN'T altered, mayhap? She just opened her mouth and switched what little brain she has, off? And out it all poured?

I remember seeing the clumsily be-wigged Mrs Hutton performing like a lamb being led to the slaughter on her Skype interview with Sonia Poultice. Mrs Hutton could not cope with the questioning from one of the least competent journalists in Britain on that day. How did she imagine she could have coped with a top notch journalist from the Sun who has years of getting to the nub of a person's beliefs and ideas by asking the right questions?

It is so obvious that all he needed to do with Mrs Hutton was start her on the track of those nasty people supporting Kate and Gerry and her wig would have been bouncing up and down with the steam being let off as she poured out her hate for the supposed wrongs what they done to poor her and how she used her powers of internet trolling to fight back. What a buzz that must have been?

• "So, Mrs Hutton, shortly after your mother died these people started abusing you just because you asked a few questions about the McCanns?"
  
  "Yes, Martin, thats how it was, these crazy people rang me up at night and made me suicidal by telling me that it was my mum who I knew was dead on the phone. I had been so lonely and these people were stopping me having fun with my new best friends on the Internet. We were all depressed and getting on a bit and lonely too with histories of depression and broken families. We were getting along really well asking questions about the McCanns like why were they not locked up as it was a disgrace and why did they not do as that nice man, Dr Police Chief Amaral told them to?  And when we asked why the McCanns had been driving round for weeks with a body in the car in the wheel well that didn't exist these pro McCanns kept telling us not to. Well we weren't going to let them get away with that. We are entitled to say what we like about the McCanns, just like Brenda Leyland said before she was bullied to death by Martin Brunt. We were attacking the McCanns because they deserved it. After all they never answered the questions. They even tried to stop us asking questions by suing dozens and dozens of people.  There were threats of writs and police flying round everywhere but things like that don't scare me."
  
  "I realised it was a war then. Well we all did and some of us were a lot more evil than me, I can tell you. But for me it was a way of finding some kind of buzz in my life. I had been lonely and depressed and now I could get a lot of praise for posting about the McCanns and the nastier I was the more praise I got. You can imagine the buzz that gave me. I'm a showoff and a real bitch when I want to be and I was getting lots of attention by now which suited me fine as I don't mind being in the limelight. You know I was the only one who volunteered to do this interview? "
  
  "As I was saying though, I do like the feeling when I squish someone. Its the same high I get when I smoke weed. Fantastic. The more outrageous we got in our attack on the McCanns the bigger was the reaction we got. What a buzz? Slapping them down, those pro McCanns who tried to stop us saying what we wanted to, pure buzz! You know you shouldn't but you do it just for the reaction and you can't stop. You just keep going back for more. Somebody has to deal with these McCann trolls, you realise that don't you Martin?"
  

She does sound manic.

That is hilarious, Greenink.

And that Poulton must have known this would happen.

Of course she did. Surely she would have known that if she were not doing that interview to shaft the anti McCanns, she would in all probability never work for the mainstream media again?

Is her career worth it to her?

Bennett sez - (snipped)



And thereby hangs a bit of a personal tale which I will share with you all. In the light of all that Hutton has said and done to me in the past year or so, it is slightly painful to recall, but here goes anyway.

Hutton first approached me soon after news broke about my contempt of court summons.

She told me she had legal experience and was a published author, was extremely sympathetic to me, and wanted to help me write out my defence. She told me she was good at writing and 'how to put things'.

I was desperate for some help at the time and arranged to meet her at a pub near her home in Kent, which was conveniently on the route to see my mother, who by then was in a care home in Sussex. I paid for the drinks.

In the end, I decided not to accept her offer (that's a story for another day perhaps).

Hutton must have thought she was a sure thing for the Six Mistresses shortlist when he paid for the drinks. Alas, Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned......

Cristobell Author ‏@RosalindaHu
2/2, 'saves kicking the dog' is an Irish/Scots expression, its a joke ffs!

No, it isn't a Scots/Irish expression, it's a Hutton expression. And it isn't funny. Still refusing to take responsibility, is she?

bb1 wrote:
Cristobell Author ‏@RosalindaHu  
2/2, 'saves kicking the dog' is an Irish/Scots expression, its a joke ffs!

No, it isn't a Scots/Irish expression, it's a Hutton expression. And it isn't funny.  Still refusing to take responsibility, is she?

From that, I guess she's zenophobic as well as all the other nasty things she has shown she is. LL

She and her chum Poulton both make claims to have 'Irish blood' when they're being obnoxious - they claim that 'their Irish blood is up'.

It is, of course, pure racism - would they blame 'Jewish blood'? Or 'West Indian blood'? It's very insulting to GENUINE Celts. But what else can you expect from the likes of them?

Hutton's in full passive-aggressive whine this morning:


To all those protesting or who may have wanted to do the interview themselves, would they have come across any better than I did? Would Sun readers for example empathise with Tony Bennett, Rothley Pillow, Ben Thompson, Zora or indeed any of the more extreme activists who campaign for Maddie? Would they have portrayed 'you all' in a good light?

NONE of them could have done a worse job than she did. Even Stuck Record wouldn't have come out with such an egotistical, ME ME ME ME ME piece.

She'd better face the fact that she's caused more damage to her own cause in one day than Evil Carter Ruck have managed in years.

The article was by Martin Daubney, NOT Sonia Poulton. He approached Sonia because he knew she was working on a McCann documentary and knew several people who, as campaigners, could be classed as trolls and he wanted someone who was willing to be identified.

And still the penny doesn't drop with dimwit Hutton.

Some forker:

I never imagine any of the prolific 'pros' are actually voicing their own, uninfluenced opinions as individuals, like us, who truly believe what they say.

I have this mental image of them all assembled every morming in a room for a de-brief and given their agenda for the day, before collecting their pay-packets at the end of the month.


What an absolute clown.

Do they actually believe sh*te like that? It explains a lot if they do, and that's a sample of their belief system.

Does it ever occur to them that people who support Madeleine and her family are NOT crazed, attention-seeking, mendacious drama queens - unlike them?

I am not even going to attempt to sum it up, it needs read as a whole, but this makes it clear that Hutton has been stitched up by her BFF Poulton, mainly for the benefit of one R. Murdoch. And doubtless Poulton's been promised lots more sofa spots on Sky News wittering on about soshal ishooes.

xxxxxxxxhttp://jillhavern.forumotion.net/t10939p20-sonia-poulton-outside-the-mccanns-front-door-picture-from-poulton-plus-message-from-a-forum-member

Amazing. ..A bit like the magician's slight of hand.
A magician is no more than a manipulator, and convinces his stooge that he himself has chosen a card, whereas in reality the magician already knows which card he wants YOU to choose.

Yup. It jumps right out at you when it's all laid out in order. If anyone could be guaranteed to make an ar@e of herself and wreck her own cause, it was the mendacious attention-seeker Hutton.

Butler may well have been Poulton's first choice, till Butler was caught with her hand in the family cookie jar. Indeed, I seem to recall that Poulton and Butler were bessie mates until the long arm of the law intervened.

Like Hutton, Butler was guaranteed to make an ar@e of herself.

Still hasn't sunk in with the Sisterhood.

Poulton didn't want someone that would speak calmly and rationally, and stick to known facts.

She wanted a mug to make a fool of herself, and make all the McCann-haters look like nasty, crazy, menopausal obsessives.

Oh my!

Sonia Poulton ‏@SoniaPoulton 42 mins42 minutes ago
@RadicalFeminist @TheSpectator7 @RosalindaHu that's not correct. It's about freedom of speech and Ros is fighting for that.

Radical Feminist ‏@RadicalFeminist 41 mins41 minutes ago
@SoniaPoulton @TheSpectator7 @RosalindaHu I thought she was fighting for Madeleine McCann

Sonia Poulton ‏@SoniaPoulton 39 mins39 minutes ago
@RadicalFeminist @TheSpectator7 @RosalindaHu the piece was not about Madeleine McCann it was about free speech.

Radical Feminist ‏@RadicalFeminist 37 mins37 minutes ago
@SoniaPoulton @TheSpectator7 @RosalindaHu Free speech is under attack. One way of doing that is by portraying critics as nasty trolls

Exactly, and Poulton and the Sun did that magnificently.

Let's remind ourselves of how it was originally touted:


Sonia Poulton‏@SoniaPoulton #journorequest am looking for a passionate #mccann anti, prepared to be identified for a newspaper feature. Chance to put case forward.

Anyone see anything about 'free speech' there? No, me neither. Poulton was looking for a gobby hater that could be relied upon to make an ar@e of herself - and her cause. And Hutton obliged.

But this does give Sonia the opportunity to put her Doco over as just Free Speech. Or anything else, according to what happens.

i.e. I had a right to doorstep The McCanns and ask them questions.