Photoshopping, videos and propaganda

She's backpedalled, blamed someone on another forum. LL

@ AnneGuedes Item? Since when has a child, alive or dead, become an item?

I've never called an alive child an item, don't worry !
A poster on another forum used the word "item" for human remains, out of delicacy I suppose. Some people here are obviously horrified by the idea Madeleine could be dead, I respect them, at least try to.

And does she think that makes it BETTER, LL? I have never, ever seen anyone refer to a child in such a manner before - and if she can't see how sick and callous that makes her, well, what does that say about her - or any of the forkers?

Oh dear. Manuela the cook would appear to have been telling porkies to the media...what she said to them doesn't seem to match her witness statement:

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=1252.0

Re: the mcanns did not SEARCH FOR MADDIE
« Reply #3 on: Today at 06:10:21 PM »

Another EPIC FAIL for hoho's propaganda.

Oh dear!

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=1256.0

Admin
Administrator
Sr. Member


Posts: 742

Please don't start threads which are obviously false
« on: Today at 10:11:19 PM »
We have noted that some threads are being started which contain falsehoods and allegations which are at best confused and at worst malicious. An example of this was the thread relating to the cook at the tapas bar who insisted that the alert was made at 9.30pm.

We know that there was no disturbance around the resort up until 10pm so one can only speculate as to why someone would attempt to state otherwise. Please keep to the facts in the McCann case and avoid the rumours if possible.

Admin

===========

And LOOKAMEE'S thread, quoting Morais and hoho, has been removed, due to statements from the files - yes, the PJ files, that all the turnips claim to have read - showing beyond all doubt that the claims being made by hoho and Morais were totally, utterly, false.

One can indeed only speculate as to why they do this. Hate squad not coming out of this in a very good light, are they?

Oh Dear. That Admin Post hasn't gone down very well, has it. And all I can add to that is that The Forkers are being treated very much more politely than they have ever treated anyone who disagrees with them, and has the audacity to post up The Truth.

I find it very telling that Cedward and co can't - or won't - tell the difference between someone suggesting possibilities based on what is known from the police files;

And Morais, hoho and co pushing outright LIES and propaganda which can be shown up as LIES by a simple comparison with the police files.

I'd forgotten just how dishonest the Gonc propagandists were - good to see them being shown up.

That Guedes forker is a nasty bit of work, judging from her conduct on Justice.

What was she like when she was aagc on the hate sites? I can't remember.

Cedward logic:


If you tried asking 100 random people on the street why anyone would delete text messages or call records from their phone, I would bet a lot of money that in excess of 90% would say, "they've got something to hide".

No, they wouldn't. They'd say, why on earth would anyone want to keep junk?

It has to be asked - is Cedward the kind of person who doesn't delete spam emails because no-one else ever contacts him?

What bizarre ideas the turnips have!

bb1 wrote:Cedward logic:


If you tried asking 100 random people on the street why anyone would delete text messages or call records from their phone, I would bet a lot of money that in excess of 90% would say, "they've got something to hide".

No, they wouldn't. They'd say, why on earth would anyone want to keep junk?

It has to be asked - is Cedward the kind of person who doesn't delete spam emails because no-one else ever contacts him?

What bizarre ideas the turnips have!

I must be one of the 10% as I 'clean' both my mobiles of all messages, text etc unless they are necessary to keep for certain reasons. I hate clutter!! LL

Agree, LL - why on earth would anyone keep junk, on their phone or puter? I find the idea that it is normal to keep junk bizarre....

bb1 wrote:Agree, LL - why on earth would anyone keep junk, on their phone or puter? I find the idea that it is normal to keep junk bizarre....

The world he knows, not I!! I expect it's cos they think something might come in useful later - you get my drift?? LL

Good to see hoho's vile propaganda videos have been removed from the Justice forum. Serves her right - she had ample time to defend them and explain herself, but refused to do so, which tells its own story.

She must be a laughing stock with the police too.

Senior mod John, to the paranoid forkers:

I will answer that for you icabodcrane and can confirm that we have been asked by twitter to keep a record of anything which has been directed at our sister site and which may be considered abusive or libellous. Anyone who uses that particular social media site and who has reported abuse will be aware of this.

As regards this forum, there are ample mechanisms in place to deal with any unacceptable conduct. Personal registration details are never passed to any third party but may be requested under police powers as part of an investigation or if subject to a Court Order.

I trust this helps?

=======

I am very glad to see that Twitter is finally taking the abuse spewed by the McCann-haters seriously.

And what are the forkers so paranoid about? Don't they keep announcing, The innocent have nothing to fear?

Anyway, it's not as if it's not-Bennett's site, where anyone who doesn't toe the Team Gonc line is first called a TROLL!!!!! and is then abused in any way the hounders can dream up.

No-one has forgotten Bennett posting San-souci's private correspondence with him.

Guedes sez:

Was this forum created as a kind of abuse repairing ? You see, I don't follow nobody related to the McCann case on Twitter, I don't do FB, I don't know those anti or pro sites, which means I can't help !

'I don't know those anti or pro sites'???????

What's this, then?


anne guedes (AACG) on Twitter
https://twitter.com/aacgThe latest from guedes anne (@ AACG). Grammaire et faits divers. Lisbon.

So, who was posting on the Morais blog, then?

http://joana-morais.blogspot.com/2009/06/exposing-swindler-truth-about.html

aacg said... 25
Dear Joana, I hope you'll get your money back. I advise exmo sr. Duarte to pay his debt. If he does, you'll let it know and we'll forget about the "fraud".


And who is this, then?

anne guedes @ AACG March 19
@ xklamation Porque ter um televisor? O meu Deitei forums.

'Misremembering', is she? And I am sure others will remember aacg posting on hate sites.

https://twitter.com/aacg

Joana Morais @ xklamation 22 Feb
Petition to pressure PT Authorities reopen the Maddie case to http://www. change.org / petitions / a-vo ice-for-madeleine ... # J4M

anne guedes @ AACG 22 Feb
@ xklamation They never will, Joana, Unless they'd find a corpse, not 'cause nothing Remained (imo). And remember Pontius Pilate!

Do these Gonc supporters never stop lying?

Mike Spudgun ‏@spudgun01 21 Feb
The #McCanns must be the first 'former suspects' in History to successfully SILENCE anyone who believes them to be complicit in any crime.


anne guedes
‏@aacg
@spudgun01 Their success is due to the many personalities who supported blindly their absurd theory.

=========

And she has the gall to state that she doesn't follow anyone to do with the McCann case on Twitter! What does anyone make of that, besides it's a blatant LIE.

She follows some of the nastiest, sickest of the McCann-haters.

anne guedes @ AACG 20 Feb
@ ProfilerPatB May be Between ground and sky as well, if I may say.


anne guedes @ AACG 19 Feb
@ AnnaEsse @ xklamation Purpose Those are the names KMC gave to the first GNR patrol guys who arrived to help 'em.

anne guedes @ AACG 13 Feb
@ ProfilerPatB Bravo! Who Believes this remarkable woman kill herself Would? Especially Effective Octavius ​​murdered her son and successor.

anne gued

es @ AACG 12 Feb
@ IWILLNOTGOAWAY @ hackinginquiry Yes, he used the press and was paid by the press. Then why is he speaking? Excellent question!

anne guedes @ AACG January 22
@ UnterdenTeppich The opportunity to win Being very tiny, They boulot Perhaps to make believe magnanimity is on Their Side.

==============

If anyone reading is also posting on Justice, please, feel free to copy these - and take a look at her timeline on twitter.

She twitters merrily with the rest of the hate mob.

Guedes/aacg refusing to give a straight answer is she? It's hoho all over again.

It's one huge sickness. I imagine her best friends don't trust her.

Did she really think she was going to get away with telling an absolute whopper like:

I don't follow nobody related to the McCann case on Twitter, I don't do FB, I don't know those anti or pro sites, which means I can't help !


It's appalling. She and Luz are showing Portugal in a very bad light indeed, with falsehoods like that, and Luz's abuse.

Quote from: icabodcrane on Today at 07:21:42 PM
Quote from: gilet on Today at 07:13:05 PM

Your concern for your fellow poster is touching. However you are forgetting it was Anne Guedes who made the claims about her Twitter etc. activity, not others.

Are you really saying that she should be allowed to lie about those claims or are you suggesting it is pure coincidence that @aacg happens to have the same name as the poster you are so touchingly being protective of?

When people make claims here they should expect to be challenged to support those claims.

I have asked the simple question did she lie or is she claiming its all a terrible coincidence? Others have noted that there is plenty of evidence of this other poster doing what Anne Guedes here claims she does not do? So did she lie or is it a coincidence?

What do you think?

You feel it is proper and acceptable for forum members to have their personal internet use 'investigated' by other members ?

You think it is proper and acceptable to hound a fellow member and stalk their on line activity ?

You are scarey gilet

It wasn't me who made the original post about this. It was Anne Guedes herself. She claimed not to follow people on Twitter.

I stalked no-one. I have a good memory and know of the Anti-McCann poster @aacg called Anne Guedes.

It was a perfectly fair question to ask was she lying about her other posting or was it pure coincidence. Though she has now half-heartedly suggested it is coincidence it is difficult to credit. Nonetheless that is what she has implied and I must accept that.

Oh, I'm sure it is just a 'coincidence'. Just like I'm sure Bill didn't have sex with Monica.

It's the funniest thing I've seen for years. Utterly farcical. There are two Portuguese Anne Guedes who speak the same type of English who both post anti McCann lies and myths on Hate Sites. I'll buy that. But then I am a fraudster's dream.

How could anyone believe it was anything other than a co-incidence, Sabot? Excuse me, I seem to have pigs flying past my window.....