Photoshopping, videos and propaganda

...And now she has the nerve to play the victim! Typical forker - they can do as they please, abuse and stalk anyone they want, but God forbid they themselves are asked to explain why they are being less than honest.

They have no shame and absolutely no sense of the hypocritical. They have ridden rough shod for years, over everyone who dares to disagree with them, but now they are being shown up something awful.
I bet they are wishing they had never got involved.

And that Luz is a nasty, vicious bitch without a shred of evidence to support her downright lies.

The McCann-haters really should read this:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_vigilantism

Real crime vigilantes
Some people form themselves into vigilante groups aiming (overtly) to "investigate" high profile cases, but in reality often their (covert) goal is to harass those people associated in some way with the crime, but against whom no successful case has been made in the courts. Recent cases include the death of JonBenét Ramsey in the USA and the disappearance in Portugal of the British girl Madeleine McCann. Operators of these sites may be counting on the limited purview of libel laws on the Internet in order to make allegations against people that might otherwise pursue defamation cases against them were the allegations published via other media.

Are they proud of themselves, being described in such a manner?

Silly hankystevy! It isn't us who claim 'Amaral authorised the beating of Leonor Cipriano', Heavens to Betsy, no!

It was that infamous McCann-hater FSoares, former PJ employee and one-time MM mod who said so, in a PM to one A. Bennett:

http://studiesindiseasedsubjects.blogspot.co.uk/search/label/FSoares

FSoares (F*******)
"Thank you so much Mr. Benett.

Yes, I think probably the word 'plot' is the right one for tramar, looking at the examples you kindly provided.

As for my job in PJ, and since I work up here in the North - in Porto - I couldn't have access to any type of special information/knowledge about the case. Sometimes I had the feeling there was a curtain of silence around it, and it looked like nobody wanted to talk or comment the case. Once, in the Summer of 2007, I emailed that woman that we could all see on pics, dusting for prints on the shutters, but, what she replied back was completely bogus and it also looked like she wanted to avoid saying anything about the case. I then stopped. I also thought it could be due to the fact that emailing via the internal system could not be good, as the IT department could read everything, if they wanted.

Unfortunatelly, I felt obliged to send Stinky a PM about my workplace as I've explained before. Beachy wasn't a problem to me and neither is you, but Stinky 'scares' me a little. That's why I avoid posting too much nowadays as I don't trust him and have a bad vibe about him. He once implied he had a very good knowledge about Joana's case and also about the details of the alleged 'torture' commited by the officers who were brought from Lisbon, under Amaral's orders. It's fishy as he can't know nothing the rest of public knows, unless:

1) he works for local Public Prosecution - or from somewhere else and someone leaked something;

2) He's from Police and has a personal agenda against Goncalo Amaral. It doesn't look so to me, because otherwise he wouldn't be a Police basher, as he is;

3) I'm pretty convinced if he cold get my identity he would whistle about it to someone from the Prosecution. That's why I am always acting with precaution.

My name is F******a R*****. My English sucks, but if you need any kind of help for anything, please feel free to ask."

===========

They needn't bother trying to blame us for what their own kind have done, need they?

...And more evasion from Guedes, on being asked:

So there are two French women called Anne Guedes who both live in Portugal and have posted about Madeleine in exactly the same way?

The reply:

The art of wasting one's time !
There's a British Anne Guedes who lives in Lisbon. She's my cousin. She hardly knows the MC case, I don't think it's her.
There are many others I don't know.
Do you pretend to see my Identity Card

As she is refusing to give a straight answer to a simple question, it is, IMO, safe to assume that it is indeed her who has been twittering with some of the nastiest forkers around.

Of course it's her. In my opinion. Allegedly. Definitely.

Is that Cedward some kind of cyber-hoarder obsessive? What a carry-on he's having about naff-all!

It really isn't normal to keep every single bit of junk and spam you get sent, on a phone or on a puter. Makes you wonder what goes on in their heads, doesn't it?

Now I've got two computers on the go, if I don't use one of them for a couple of days I have to delete a whole load in one go. This is really boring. And what is the point of keeping a load of stuff you've already read, unless it contains information that you might need.

Oh My God, The McCanns deleted phone messages. Must be guilty. This mind bogglingly, obsessively nasty. In fact I can hardly express how stupid it is.

Redblossom


Re: Amaral's grasp of forensics ...
« Reply #62 on: April 15, 2013, 09:18:34 PM »
DCI were thos hairs tested for deathbanding? That was the question.

Has to be Beachy, or one of her cult.

Hateworld's foremost native American/young British copper/anti-Vietnam demonstrator/top Feeb/Martin Luther King marcher/spouse of strong-jawed heart op miracle survivor/single-handed captor of serial killers is the only one who bangs on about 'death banding'.

She claims her old mates at Quantico tell her all about it.

Which is, as usual with forker WUMs, total bullsh*t.

Death Banding is about as reliable as Cadaver Dogs. Not all hair from dead bodies develop a death band, and it has to be on a dead body for some time before it does, if it does. All on Google if anyone is interested, but I can't be bothered to look for it again. Another subject that I know more about than I ever wanted to.

Cedward really does sound, well, wierd:

I hardly ever delete messages, have a phone that is > 3 years old and I have thousands and thousands of text messages on it. It would never occur to me to delete messages "just in case" lots were about to arrive and I would think that is the same for pretty much ANYONE except, of course, those who have a vested interest in making such actions (at any time) understandable, let alone at a time of emergency.


I've never heard of anyone keeping 'thousands and thousands' of old txts before; does he keep spam email trying to sell him Viagra, too?

And as has been pointed out to him REPEATEDLY, older cellphone simply didn't have that much storage space.

Seems to me that, because he is some kind of cyber-hoarder, he thinks everyone else should be, too?

He's mad. No one I know does that. And how would you know where to find anything, presuming you wanted to.

Actually, I simply do not believe him. He is just shit stirring his paranoia. Ooooh, The McCanns planned on killing Madeleine by Cell Phone. Or, The McCanns told all their friends they had killed her, by Cell Phone. Dickhead.

They aren't awfully good at this 'logic' stuff, are they?

Grownup:


I won't bring his post over here, because I know that's frowned on on this board, but Jean-Pierre made a post elsewhere the gist of which was that while either side might have suggested an out-of-court settlement, the idea of the McCanns requesting a settlement on Amaral's terms is unlikely, because the McCanns always have the option of simply dropping the action if they see no prospect of success

Justiceforker:

Do you really believe 'simply dropping the action' is a realistic or acceptable option for the McCanns ?

It would be a PR disaster, and send the message that Amaral had not libeled them in his book


And begging Amoral to settle wouldn't be? I see.

When is it going to sink in with them that the McCanns did NOT make approaches to Gonc to settle - because apart from anything else, they have no more idea what happened to Madeleine than we do.

Gonc not only fouled up the investigation, he has been conducting a vendetta against the McCanns ever since and is now desperate to salvage anything he can from the ruin his own actions have caused him.

He repeatedly libelled the McCanns, and others, and lied on several occasions in his book and ridiculous 'documentary'. And in his numerous interviews.

Now he pays the price.

Cedward still banging on about phones:



I find you and your associates' dismissal of this as utterly incredible. If any of this kind of evidence existed against Amaral for one of your witch hunts you'd be burning effigies of him by now.

What? No-one would be even remotely interested in him doing something as banal and normal as tidying a phone - indeed, in his case, it would be more like a miracle for him to be so organised.

This is the most ridiculous 'debate' I have seen for a very long time. How on earth any sane adult can think this is 'evidence'? It's hard to believe a supposed adult could be so obsessed with something so....normal, indeed, run of the mill....as people deleting superfluous material from their cellphones.

Strange, strange ideas these forkers get.

....And as the world turns again, Cedward is STILL going on about phones.

It would be a kindness for someone to suggest he seeks help for his bizarre obsession.

bb1 wrote:....And as the world turns again, Cedward is STILL going on about phones.

It would be a kindness for someone to suggest he seeks help for his bizarre obsession.

I noticed he is under surveillance by the mods - little icon on his name plate says 'watched'. LL

A most peculiar character. I seem to recall he got into a tangle on the old pfa and had to hurriedly invent a 'sister' who not only shared his login, but also sounded exactly like him?

And he was used as a floormop on Myths? He's another one who puts words on the screen, but it is well nigh impossible to make any kind of sense of those words.

As for this obsession with phones.....

bb1 wrote:A most peculiar character. I seem to recall he got into a tangle on the old pfa and had to hurriedly invent a 'sister' who not only shared his login, but also sounded exactly like him?

And he was used as a floormop on Myths? He's another one who puts words on the screen, but it is well nigh impossible to make any kind of sense of those words.

As for this obsession with phones.....

Yes, he foolishly logged off then straight back on again as his sister, with the same IP and was outed by admin. He and his sister left, abruptly!! LL

Ah, apologies, it wasn't a shared login, he had two accounts - though not for long.

bb1 wrote:Ah, apologies, it wasn't a shared login, he had two accounts - though not for long.

Even I, dim as I am on these matters, knows that, if you want to appear to be someone else, you use a proxy! LL

They don't always work, LL.

There's nothing like seeing an ip in your stats appearing as anonymouse c/o Ulan Bator to make you suspect all is not as it seems.

I noticed that the Justice rules don't allow proxies.

Oh, the laughs I had when I was Moderating. Seeing all these different names and IPs coming up. Multiple Accounts, and several people using the same Log Ins.

Lord spare us, Cedward is still at it. Does he suffer from some kind of bizarre Obsessive-Compusive Disorder?

Or is this super-trolling? Is he trying to bore everyone to death so they go away?

bb1 wrote:Lord spare us, Cedward is still at it. Does he suffer from some kind of bizarre Obsessive-Compusive Disorder?

Or is this super-trolling? Is he trying to bore everyone to death so they go away?

He likes being disruptive and getting the last word in. I also thinks he's a misogynist, he always seems to be arguing with people with female IDs. LL

Lamplighter wrote:

bb1 wrote:Lord spare us, Cedward is still at it. Does he suffer from some kind of bizarre Obsessive-Compusive Disorder?

Or is this super-trolling? Is he trying to bore everyone to death so they go away?

He likes being disruptive and getting the last word in. I also thinks he's a misogynist, he always seems to be arguing with people with female IDs. LL

Mummy, Mummy, he's abusing me now. What shall I do?