BENNETT CARRIES ON REGARDLESS

Judge at Bennett's trial...

Who could blame him?

He'll be asleep for a fortnight if he has to read Bennetts hymn books.

I bet he asks to call Muratfan. Now whats he going to do when MF turns up in a dress (sorry )

He will be shocked, Maggs. He's so convinced himself that she is a he. Never mind, he deserves a few more surprises.

lily wrote:He will be shocked, Maggs. He's so convinced himself that she is a he. Never mind, he deserves a few more surprises.

I wonder if Ironside will be coming over? He's a SH/IM though, lying bitch dog.

That one really sounds deranged, Maggs. It could be called as a character witness for Bennett, I suppose?

Well talk of the devil and He will appear

http://www.pfa2.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=8365&p=271166#p271166




Now, don't you just love the irony of Bennett refusing to answer questions for legal reasons?

Someone should make a video, put it on YouTube and pretend to be a judge...

http://brenryanandco.blogspot.com/2011/08/oh-dear-now-stella-you-should-know.html

Another one twisting things round to suit themselves

YES! YES! YES! That would be awesome. Someone could do it with one of those antenna things sticking out from the side of their head.

I really wanted to put a video somewhere about Richard Branson's home on Necker, since Bennett was going on about him.

http://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/richard-bransons-necker-island-nude-models-raucous-parties/story?id=14370903

He's off his head, he must be, he is STILL hassling Smethurst:

zampos Anthony Bennett
jillhavern.forumotion.net/t3384p10-pic-o… More details here re #McCann lawyer Ed Smethurst's Masonic Lodge. He was Lodge Master in 2001. Lodge has GMP members
2 hours ago

Who cares? What normal person is in the slightest bit interested? Never mind, it is yet more clear proof that Bennett cannot be trusted to keep any agreement.

Can someone please tell me what on earth this trivia about lodge masters in the 1930's has to do with anything?

Don't get me wrong, I am not complaining; every single bit of it is yet more proof - if such were needed - that Bennett is NOT going to stop this obsessive harrassment voluntarily.

And I don't suppose it has dawned on him that he is going to take the entire Hate Industry down with him when he is in court trying to explain all this...


Sane people in the real world are not going to differentiate between Bennett, the knuckledragger haters like Thug, and the 'respectable' haters who 'debate and discuss' and use words of more than one syllable to say, We hate them McCanns.

No, the Great British public is going to see them all as exactly the same as Stalker Bennett. Which, of course, they are, so it's all good

Re: Anonymous email
Stella Today

Gillyspot wrote:


Perhaps Kate means "without payment" from the fund. I.E. Payment may be made from somewhere else - question is where.


Exactly and that is a very good question Gillyspot. One that needs to be answered. Perhaps Tony could ask this question in his next letter to them, as surely, HE is entitled to find out who is paying for the legal action being taken against him !!!!

And why, pray tell, would that be? Like so much else, it is none of their business. It's about time they got it into their thick heads that they have NO RIGHT to continually sticky beak into other people's affairs.

Bennett should have thought of all this before he libelled, stalked and harrassed so many people.
Not to mention the Contempt of Court.

Oh, and PS - have they found out what EX PARTE really means yet?

Remember the Carter Ruck letter to Bennett last August?


"You have speculated as to the financial basis on which our clients instruct us. This is, of course, no concern of yours, but suffice it to say that your speculation about our clients’ funding arrangements is entirely misplaced. In particular, we have never been paid a penny by the Find Madeleine Fund."

Not to mention Kate McCann making it clear in her book that both Ms Hudson and Adam Tudor help them

WITHOUT PAYMENT

You know what? I don't think the haters can grasp reality - that the men and women at Carter Ruck are disgusted by their persecution of the McCanns, and people associated with them.

It's like poor old JCL and her obsession with ' paid chimps'.

It reveals a great deal about the pitchforkers' mindset - that people are disgusting, cruel and vicious for free, but have to be paid to do the right thing.

bb1 wrote:He's off his head, he must be, he is STILL hassling Smethurst:

zampos Anthony Bennett
jillhavern.forumotion.net/t3384p10-pic-o… More details here re #McCann lawyer Ed Smethurst's Masonic Lodge. He was Lodge Master in 2001. Lodge has GMP members
2 hours ago

Who cares? What normal person is in the slightest bit interested? Never mind, it is yet more clear proof that Bennett cannot be trusted to keep any agreement.

He mentioned before that he wants to stipulate that any judge at his hearings cannot be a Freemason, so here is is mentioning GMP.

I wonder if the police investigation is heating up?

lily wrote:

bb1 wrote:He's off his head, he must be, he is STILL hassling Smethurst:

zampos Anthony Bennett
jillhavern.forumotion.net/t3384p10-pic-o… More details here re #McCann lawyer Ed Smethurst's Masonic Lodge. He was Lodge Master in 2001. Lodge has GMP members
2 hours ago

Who cares? What normal person is in the slightest bit interested? Never mind, it is yet more clear proof that Bennett cannot be trusted to keep any agreement.

He mentioned before that he wants to stipulate that any judge at his hearings cannot be a Freemason, so here is is mentioning GMP.

I wonder if the police investigation is heating up?

What happens if the Judge is a Catholic like the McCanns?
ETA: Will he ask that Judge to recuse himself?

Maybe he thinks that because he is so important, he can request a judge selection process, Tony? Like a jury selection with a twist.

HB.

honestbroker wrote:... as surely, HE [TB] is entitled to find out who is paying for the legal action being taken against him !!!!

In a word, NO!

The person paying for carter ruck is one A. Bennett. Will you tell him or shall I?

sans_souci wrote:

honestbroker wrote:... as surely, HE [TB] is entitled to find out who is paying for the legal action being taken against him !!!!

In a word, NO!

The person paying for carter ruck is one A. Bennett. Will you tell him or shall I?

Oh, course it will be, sans. There, they can stop those questions now.

sans_souci wrote:

honestbroker wrote:... as surely, HE [TB] is entitled to find out who is paying for the legal action being taken against him !!!!

In a word, NO!

The person paying for carter ruck is one A. Bennett. Will you tell him or shall I?

Oh yes, of course! It's Bennett who is paying

Anyone seen Grenville recently?
Come to that, anyone seen Gonc recently?

No, Bonny. Gonc is probably overcome by Bennett's belief in him and his book?