Twitter pledges to clamp down on trolls

He is, of course, absolutely right. Citizen churnalists come out with the most awful old tosh, all seen through the lens of their own prejudices. They make NO attempt whatsoever to be accurate or unbiased - just look at Donn, and the hounder rumour-mongering she regurgitates as 'news'.

Donn is, IMO, little more than a PR for Bennett.

But because readers delude themselves that citizen churnalists are somehow more honest and earthy than the MSM, they fall for utter drivel, that they would tear to shreds if it appeared in the Sun.

All the while telling themselves that Sun readers are 'sheeple' and they themselves are the enlightened ones.

It's a strange upside down world we live in.

It is indeed, Lily. I wonder why the McCann-haters have such a genius for latching onto rather unpleasant people to idolize?

Katie Hopkins ‏@KTHopkins 8h8 hours ago
Katie Hopkins Retweeted
A child? YOU ARE KIDDING ME? Looking to impress her mates by snagging a footballer. Hey presto. From slag to wag. https://twitter.com/tylerlfc_/status/706390934943047680 …

Oh, Ms Hopkins will be happy - it's made the tabloids already.

http://www.mirror.co.uk/3am/celebrity-news/katie-hopkins-blasted-calling-adam-7505642



Katie Hopkins blasted for calling Adam Johnson's child sex abuse victim a "s**g" who "wanted to impress her mates"
14:48, 6 MAR 2016 UPDATED 17:45, 6 MAR 2016
BY CLAIRE RUTTER
The shocking posts were made on Sunday, where the motormouth appeared to place blame on the schoolgirl despite the former footballer's conviction in the child sex abuse trial


 
Katie Hopkins has faced a ferocious backlash after branding Adam Johnson’s 15-year-old victim a “slag”.

Motormouth Katie spewed the vitriolic abuse while comparing the former Sunderland and England footballer to the Cecil the Lion killer on Saturday.

Katie appeared to suggest that Johnson, who pleaded guilty to counts of grooming and sexual activity with a child, as well as being found guilty at trial of one more serious count of sexual activity with a child, was actually the victim of a witch hunt.

She goaded her 600,000 followers to “look up the definition of paedophile” in one tweet.

Johnson has been warned by a judge that he will be facing jail when he returns to court in two weeks.

In the shocking post on Mother’s Day, Katie wrote: “A child? YOU ARE KIDDING ME? Looking to impress her mates by snagging a footballer. Hey presto. From slag to wag.”

She also appeared to place blame on the victim, as she wrote: "Adam Johnson is the new Cecil the Lion killer. Except, Cecil is a 15 year old girl who wanted to impress her mates by playing with guns."....more at link.

The McCann-haters won't care, Hopkins also abuses Madeleine's family, so whatever she says is OK with them.

Sickening, disgusting, sadistic - but what else can be expected of these wretched creatures?

First Class Travel ‏@IamDavidSteel 2h2 hours ago
Can you imagine the abuse this girl is going to get in the street thanks to Hopkins calling her a slag. #McCann

Quite. Utterly vile apologies for human beings - the thought of any of them being around children is horrifying. And that includes Hopkins.

Melanie Baker ‏@MelaniebakerAnn  2h2 hours ago
@Lady_LeFaye she discredited the #mccann ' story, and not for the first time, surely that is more important than any other opinion KH has.

Yes, hating the McCanns is more important than ANYTHING else. Anything is permissable, as long as you hate the families of missing children.

When you consider everything troubling that is going on in the world there are people who can only speak McCann?

My goodness me........what can you say?

Katie Hopkins ‏@KTHopkins 2 hrs2 hours ago
My latest column @MailOnline @DailyMailUK with you soon. 'From slag to wag to victim - quite a journey for one so *coughs* young.

Just what kind of a low-life do you have to be, to use a young abuse victim as clickbait to boost your bank account?

Beyond the sort of low-life the McCann-haters idolize?

Also being discussed here:

http://www.stopthemyths.info/viewtopic.php?f=149&t=6589&start=1525

They LIE when they say they are not haters!


Sample:

This new attention seeking activity of KH is disgusting. She is doing the same thing as she did to the Mccanns, raising hate against a crime victim. This young girl she is bullying has been identified on social media. She is no longer anonymous and KH is making public abuse against her which will endanger her from further abuse, possibly from dangerous people. K+G have made procedures to protect themselves and their children from dangerous people, but how does this young girl protect herself?

IMO, Hopkins doesn't give a damn about the victim - all she cares about is.....



She'll turn on the McCann-hating trolls as soon as it's in her interests to do so.

So, Ms Hopkins churns out yet more nasty victim-blaming clickbait in the Mail.

I wonder, when is she going to pick on someone that will retaliate?

http://www.stopthemyths.info/viewtopic.php?f=149&t=8241&start=125

Interesting point on that thread:

Katie Hopkins seems to be a very vile woman. If you type her name into Google, you will find many articles written about her attention seeking for money activities. One article says she has invented a perfect 'template' for making money and that she chooses subjects which she thinks will offend the most people as a strategy to get herself in the news and have people talking about her. Her victims are usually vulnerable groups who do not or can not fight back, like refugee children and disabled children (and now missing children). She was also abusive about a young woman who was raped and murdered (victim blaming). I think perhaps she chose K+G Mccann and to attack the rights of a missing child because she thinks this will cause outrage against her and give her more attention. It seems that she really is hated/loathed by most people and is described as a 'professional troll'. I think if she really thought everyone will agree with her, then she would not say her comments because they would not be 'contra' versial.

Yes, she seems to be deliberately courting the same sub-section of the population as Jeremy Kyle. There is something too studied about her 'outrageous' opinions for them to be genuine, IMO.

Hope the McCann-haters are proud of their latest heroine?

It shows how manipulative she is.

Yes - like so many of her ilk, she's very good at picking on easy targets.

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/adam-johnson-fans-facebook-appeal-7512143

Adam Johnson fans' Facebook appeal page is taken down following disgraced footballer's conviction
17:56, 7 MAR 2016 UPDATED 17:59, 7 MAR 2016
BY TOM WILKINSON
Disgusting comments about Johnson's victim angered members of the public, who then complained to Facebook and asked for it to be removed....story at link.

That'll give Hopkins something else to b*tch about, no doubt. She is NOT standing up for the haters' beloved Free Speach, she is, IMO, just another bullying troll. The only thing different about her is, she makes a very comfortable living from it.

Which in turn means she is not about to give that up any time soon.....

http://www.thenorthernecho.co.uk/news/14327136.Tabloid_editor_fined_over_Adam_Johnson_girl_photo/

A FORMER tabloid newspaper editor has been ordered to pay £2,300 for printing a photograph of Adam Johnson’s teenage victim.

On March 4 last year, just two days after the Sunderland player was arrested, The Sun newspaper carried a pixelated picture of the schoolgirl standing beside Johnson as part of an article on the case.

Today (Monday, March 7), after a trial at Westminster Magistrates’ Court, former editor David Dinsmore was found guilty of breaching the Sexual Offences (Amendment) Act 1992, which guarantees lifelong anonymity to the victims of sexual offences.


The 47-year-old newspaper executive was ordered to pay £1,300 costs and £1,000 in compensation.

Speaking after the case, Detective Inspector Aelfwynn Sampson, of Durham Constabulary, said: “We are delighted with today’s result.

“What Dinsmore did in The Sun was legally and morally wrong.

“As a victim of a sexual offence, the identity of this child should have been protected. Instead her picture, although pixelated, was plastered across a national tabloid.

“She was not fair game, she was a child who was groomed by a person in power for his own sexual gratification.

“I hope today’s result serves as reminder that anyone who identifies someone who may or may not be a victim of a sexual offence is committing a criminal act and we will take robust action.”..etc


“As a victim of a sexual offence, the identity of this child should have been protected. Instead her picture, although pixelated, was plastered across a national tabloid.

“She was not fair game, she was a child who was groomed by a person in power for his own sexual gratification.

Hope someone points that out to uber-troll Hopkins and her fan club.

Oh but please they cannot possibly mean them, can they? They are speshul trolls.....

Normally, anyone smeared the way Hopkins smeared the young girl, would be calling the lawyers in, Lily. But Hopkins chose her victim carefully - it will be very hard for the target of her bile to gain redress, as she has the right to anonymity.

A lot of these bottom-feeders have ignored the law, unfortunately.

The law doesn't apply to them? They're too speshul for it?

It's their Free Speach, innit? They've got their Yuman Rites, innit?

http://davidbretisagod.forumotion.co.uk/t1357-anti-accusing-posters-on-twitter-of-being-paedos#14695

Haters are vile.

Fascinating to watch the haters performing contortions to defend their beloved Hopkins.

It appears that, in hateworld, it is perfectly acceptable for older, rich men to prey on teenagers for sex, and completely disregard the law.

So much for all their sistahood garbage!

Sandra Mosley ‏@sandramosley 3h3 hours ago
@KTHopkins any chance you can do a follow up to your #mccann article plz it was superb love you to interview the ******abuse redacted***** pair


Looks like abusing a teenager wasn't bad enough for the Hopkins fan club....

But here's the thing. Hopkins and her ilk have a strictly limited spell in the limelight. The public tires of their predictable venom-spitting for ££££££££.

Or they say something so horrible, they finally destroy themselves. IMO, Hopkins is very close to that now....

http://www.ok.co.uk/celebrity-news/katie-hopkins-blames-teenager-adam-johnson-case

KATIE Hopkins has shared another unpopular opinion of hers after she claimed the teenage girl involved with Adam Johnson is not the victim.

The outspoken columnist has received a backlash on Twitter for her most recent post, after she described the 15-year-old victim as a "s**g". ...etc.

Hopkins will be happy - she really does seem to imagine there's no such thing as bad publicity. She's on about Turkey now - must have got tired of pitchforking teenage girls that can't answer back.

Forker:

Quote from: carlymichelle on Today at 08:28:42 PM
katies article about the mcanns upset the mcann supporters alot more then they have let on imo

Normal people generally ARE upset about rich, older men abusing young girls - but of course, haters aren't normal in any way whatsoever.