Photoshopping, videos and propaganda

Who knew hoho was a comedian as well as a propagandist?

The CREDIBILITY OF MY VIDEOS IS IMPORTANT TO ME!

I spend too many hours creating videos for my credibility to be questioned because of one or two issues.

'One or two issues'? That's a good 'un.

Her propaganda fillums are being shredded as the lies they are in front of her eyes - she has less 'credibility' than Young Fat Fool's unicorn.

That has to be one of the best things she has said to date.

Sorry if I put this here......guess who has turned up on that forum? Yes, Sabot, your dreams are answered but, she has not brought any attention whatsoever to her er...... disability. Not her no. Never.

Oh, so she has!


carlymichelle
Newbie

Posts: 1
against child neglect

for the record
« on: Today at 01:59:53 PM »
WE so called anti mcanns are NOT haters we have a diffrence ofa opinion and we do not believe the mcanns version of events the world would be boring if everybody agreed with each other further more i thought the person who compared the mcanns suffering to the nazi victims in twitter was over the line and totally sick on both sides of this debate people are passionate but that is too far!!! and for those who know me i dont mispell because im stupid but bceause i was born with a disablity

Show respect, everyone, LOOKAMEE!!!! is in da house, and making it all about herself already.

Will they rename the forum Justice for Lookamee?

Debunker:


PLaying the pity card early?

Bang on!

lily wrote:Will they rename the forum Justice for Lookamee?

Have you ever known an ego like it, Lily? Let's not bother with discussing what's-her-name's disappearance, I'm here, so let's talk about MEEEEEEEE!!!!!!

bb1 wrote:

lily wrote:Will they rename the forum Justice for Lookamee?

Have you ever known an ego like it, Lily? Let's not bother with discussing what's-her-name's disappearance, I'm here, so let's talk about MEEEEEEEE!!!!!!

She does this over and over and over, doesn't she? Its always about her. I truly pity her parents.

She's never done with her attention-seeking, is she? She doesn't seem to grasp the idea of 'debate' at all - she really should stick with her own kind, instead of going elsewhere to pick fights.

She seems to be talking to herself on one of her threads. Also, why is she bringing the laws of Australia into this?

I've just noticed something - mainly due to forkers going on about 'curtains tucked behind beds'. No, they weren't:



There is a clear space, about a foot, between the bed and the wall in that picture.

You can see it here too:



I hadn't realised before what a big space there is between the curtains and the bed. Easily enough for someone to stand in and pass a child out a window....

lily wrote:She seems to be talking to herself on one of her threads. Also, why is she bringing the laws of Australia into this?

Because she can make it about herself? Even though she is as irrelevant to a grown-up discussion as Aussie law is to Portuguese law?

So there is.

I had never noticed that before, Lily, in all the forker nonsense about curtains being tucked behind beds and people having to stand on beds to get out that window.

There is actually a good distance between the bed and the window, which makes a nonsense of yet more of their beloved shibboleths.

Yes it does, Bonny.

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=1134.msg31931#new

Another good post by 'gilet', in response to an increasingly paranoid-sounding hoho.

Incidentally, is Snap Your Neck Spudgun telling her what to say? She seems to have picked up his HABIT of putting words in upper CASE for no apparent REASON.

It may be that the two of them are working in tandem?

Gilet is one heck of a good debater.

bb1 wrote:Who knew hoho was a comedian as well as a propagandist?

The CREDIBILITY OF MY VIDEOS IS IMPORTANT TO ME!

I spend too many hours creating videos for my credibility to be questioned because of one or two issues.

'One or two issues'? That's a good 'un.

Her propaganda fillums are being shredded as the lies they are in front of her eyes - she has less 'credibility' than Young Fat Fool's unicorn.

They are all one complete lie after another. I just hadn't realised just how bad they are.
This has got to be the biggest demolition job of all time. And The Justice Forum are actually interested.

lily wrote:Sorry if I put this here......guess who has turned up on that forum? Yes, Sabot, your dreams are answered but, she has not brought any attention whatsoever to her er...... disability. Not her no. Never.

Really? Thank you, God.

bb1 wrote:Oh, so she has!


carlymichelle
Newbie

Posts: 1
against child neglect

for the record
« on: Today at 01:59:53 PM »
WE so called anti mcanns are NOT haters we have a diffrence ofa opinion and we do not believe the mcanns version of events the world would be boring if everybody agreed with each other further more i thought the person who compared the mcanns suffering to the nazi victims in twitter was over the line and totally sick on both sides of this debate people are passionate but that is too far!!! and for those who know me i dont mispell because im stupid but bceause i was born with a disablity

Show respect, everyone, LOOKAMEE!!!! is in da house, and making it all about herself already.

Dear God, I'm not sure I can cope. Further more, eh! Been taking lessons, has she?

The Justice Forum are actually interested

I am in awe of their mods, insisting on people stick to what is proven and held true, legally, Sabot. I had given up hope of ever seeing a demolition job like this on assorted myths and lies - the forkers usually run crying to the mods, as happened with Bennett and the footy forum.

They actually are interested in miscarriages of justice. And they have managed to convince me that Jeremy Bamber is almost certainly guilty. The analysis has been nigh on perfect.
You all know me. I want proof before I decide.

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=1117.15


gilet
Re: An analysis of HiDeHo's video on the dogs.
« Reply #22 on: Today at 04:30:38 PM »

Would this be a good moment for hoho to remove her propaganda from the internet and stick to painting doors?

I am really angry about her flagrant abuse of copyright in those stupid so called videos of hers. I applaud Gilet for taking her to task.

I have had friends in the music business for years and I KNOW for a FACT how they react to theft of their products without permission.

She had this to say about it all ..........

I uploaded and thought I could edit once it was online. Not so.

My video was blocked in Germany because of the music, so I made a concerted effort to scour the internet for cover versions of those songs, as I didn't want Germany prohibited from vewing the songs.

I found two GREAT singers who agreed to let me use their versions Scattg and Markiss. so the third attempt at that video became this one.

The stupid thief had cover versions of the songs? Did those two "GREAT" singers get permission to record those songs as they DID NOT WRITE THEM? Did Hoho get permission? I think not............

She does understand that that is theft, I take it? Or did those GREAT singers write original music for the videos?

Like so many of the forkers, hoho has a very cavalier attitude to the rights of others while she spreads her clunking, lying, propaganda.