Gonc fails to make satisfactory offer to McCanns

J-P, it baffles me. For nigh on SIX years, they have been lied to, conned, led up the garden path, fed a load of bolleaux, swallowed down endless lies and WUM-mery to give them hope - and not once have they been right about anything.

They are actually CHOOSING to believe lies, and to be lied to. I don't know what is wrong with them - I can only assume that being sick, nasty, vicious and generally acting like pitchforkers is more important to them than the truth.

They certainly needn't bother pretending they care a XXXX about Madeleine McCann, or any other child. She is just an excuse for them to be publically wicked.

Look at who they idolize.

Amaral, the disgraced ex-cop who committed perjury to cover up torture.

Cristovao, the thug facing a slew of gangsterism charges.

Tavares de Almeida, the convicted torturer, who assaulted a Portuguese citizen in a manner worthy of the Middle Ages.

And all the minor hangers on, the liars, fakes and WUMs.

There is something wrong in their heads, there must be.

Now what was Miss Morais said way back then; ah yes,"The British will believe anything you tell them providing there is a small bit of truth in parts of it".

Incidentally, have you noticed their latest delusion? That, because Marcos Correia and Professor Dore were cleared of defaming Gonc - indeed, the court seemed to think it was impossible to defame him - that Gonc will win against the McCanns?

Bizarre.

They seem to forget little details like events proving Marcos and Professor Dore more or less right, and events proving Gonc to be a lying toad.

I don't think they can grasp the damage the perjury conviction has done him. Or that the half-time interim report was already overturned by the Archiving Dispatch - and fit only for the bin when its author, Almeida, was convicted of torture.

crazytony wrote:Now what was Miss Morais said way back then; ah yes,"The British will believe anything you tell them providing there is a small bit of truth in parts of it".

Oh yes, Tony. And what's that other one they are so fond of?

FOR ENGLISH EYES

That's also used a lot, to sweep the truth under the carpet.

bb1 wrote:

crazytony wrote:Now what was Miss Morais said way back then; ah yes,"The British will believe anything you tell them providing there is a small bit of truth in parts of it".

Oh yes, Tony. And what's that other one they are so fond of?

FOR ENGLISH EYES

That's also used a lot, to sweep the truth under the carpet.

Yes, I remember that one too, Bonny.

Don't kid yourselves that they care about Amaral or Bennett.Those two are just a means to an end to feed their justification. they could hardly expect to get away with their vitriol even to themselves if they couldn't point the finger at two martyrs and say, "Look at these two Saints and what they are risking. One a Policeman and the other a Solicitor. They must be right."

Amaral and Bennett are another kettle of fish. Both Bullies and both Failures, searching for fame and glory.

Not a word of Fake News Spinny about Gonc's woes from Morais. No, all she can throw together is yet another tedious and irrelevant piece about what M3 were doing playing Watergate in Catalonian politics.

Forgive me if I don't read it, I don't want to fall asleep quite yet........

How very interesting - and telling - that Portugal's Number One Citizen Blogger hasn't got a word to say about anything important and relevant.

Like, her adored Gonc's legal problems. Not quite as sunny as has been made out, then?

Joana Morais ‏@xklamation
@markblk9779 ... Editors' Code of Practice committee a very much needed step. No need for Leveson nor for absurd Royal Charter regulation.

And why is it her business, anyway? Maybe we should start telling Portugal how to run its press? They could start by cleaning the porn from CdM - though there wouldn't be much left then....

bb1 wrote:Joana Morais ‏@xklamation
@markblk9779 ... Editors' Code of Practice committee a very much needed step. No need for Leveson nor for absurd Royal Charter regulation.

And why is it her business, anyway? Maybe we should start telling Portugal how to run its press? They could start by cleaning the porn from CdM - though there wouldn't be much left then....

The British press is no business of Morais. However, if she wishes to appear in it, I'm sure that can be arranged. After all, I'm pretty certain she wishes one and all to know the British people are c*nts, doesn't she?

I'd like to know why she thinks combining her usual smears on the McCann family with dirty deeds in Catalonian politics is somehow more important or relevant than telling her shrooms the truth about the mess Gonc is in.

Or maybe Big Rock hasn't given her her script yet? She must be really out of the loop these days.

BTW, why has she still not said a word about Cristovao and the allegations against him? Surely that is far more serious - and relevant.

JillyCL ‏@JillyCL
@xklamation *blushes* I'm SO sorry Jo, I didn't see your link. I checked your blog earlier today. http://joana-morais.blogspot.com/2013/02/mccanns-former-detectives-metodo-3.html … #McCann

Oh dear, the illiterate McCann-haters are all excited by a report in the Portugal News containing the line:


Kate and Gerry McCann sued Amaral for 1.2 million euros in damages, and the case was put on hold due to an apparent attempt in January by the McCanns to reach an out-of-court settlement.

Don't they know the meaning of the word APPARENT? Clearly not.

It means the reporter doesn't know anything about it, beyond the spin put out by Team Gonc.

As they will find out in the fullness of time, it was GONC who was desperate to settle out of court, just as Bennett is currently begging for mercy from Carter Ruck.

Gonc's offer was unsatisfactory and turned down. Still, it means he has managed to delay things at least until September.

Why aren't they asking themselves why it's always the likes of Gonc and Bennett who hold up proceedings? Why aren't they demanding Morais tell them the truth?

Too stupid? Too scared? Who knows - indeed, who cares?

They'll find out for themselves, and all those pics of burned bread are going to look very foolish indeed. Still, I suppose the likes of smiffy has to post what he's told to post by Team Gonc.

Still no sign of Morais telling the Gonc Cult the truth about what Big Rock did? Ah well, the longer she keeps the shrooms in the dark, the more Tears Before Bedtime we can look forward to from them.

https://www.facebook.com/pages/Criminal-Profiler-Pat-Brown/387068190642?sk=wall&filter=1

Criminal Profiler Pat Brown Lisa, Amazon will never take a chance on my book since it is self-pubbed; I don't blame them. However, they WOULD sell a book by Goncalo and me IF we could find a US publisher with any balls. So far, no luck

What, you mean no-one wants a book by a self-styled 'profiler' who's been booted by the big networks, and a European convicted perjurer?

Can't think what the problem could possibly be......

Oh dear. Someone's asked Claudia about Gonc's fabled Ace. Now, try not to laugh, folks...

Re: No settlement
Claudia79 Today

Lillyofthevalley wrote:

Claudia79 wrote:
The biggest card that GA's defence will use in court will be one provided by the McCanns themselves. And that is truly ironic.


Claudia I'm a bit slow on picking things up sometimes

Can you explain please


I meant the court decision which reinstated the sale of GA's book. I'm sure GA's defence will use that decision as a strong card. There was already a court which spoke about the contents of the book. And that decision exists because the McCanns tried to suppress freedom of speech.

Is that it?

One would have expected her to read the judgement just a little more carefully than that. If that's the extent of his defence, no wonder he's running scared.

They're going to have to 'fess up and tell the truth about the convicted perjurer being desperate to settle sooner or later.

She would never make it as a lawyer in a court of law, would she?

Truly, truly woeful - they're like children, convinced that because they say something, it must be so. They are in for some very nasty shocks.

My friends, this was taken from The Portugal News newspaper:

http://www.theportugalnews.com/news/mccanns-and-amaral-fail-to-reach-settlement/27800

feel free to write comments contradicting antis.

Pedro, I wouldn't bother about them, honestly. It's just the Usual Suspects posting their usual trash. It was trash the first time they posted it, it's trash now, and it's always going to be trash, no matter how many times they post it, no matter how many sites they try to hatespam.

Just wait till they find out they've been lied to yet again by Team Gonc - that it was HIM who has delayed things yet again.

By my reckoning, he's managed to postpone the libel hearing until after Portugal's summer break - praying for a miracle, no doubt. Let him stall. Sooner or later, he's going to have to face a court, just as Bennett did.

yes bb1, the trash from amaral, pat insane brown, antis: stinks.

Gonc was probably hoping Bennett would win. Those two have been playing musical chairs for ages. It was always a toss up as to who would get dragged into court first. Even Bennett had another go at when he got into court.
THE JUDGE SAID NO. That's what will happen to Gonc eventually.

Notice none of them are publically mentioning the fact that Bennett tried to delay proceedings yet again? As you say, he and Gonc are just playing games to delay the inevitable.

And if their fans cannot - or will not - work out for themselves why Bennett and Big Rock are terrified of having to defend themselves, well, that's their problem.

...And 'Me' still hasn't worked out that smiffy's declarations about all things Gonc have as much gravitas and value as Textusa's declarations about Gonc = NONE.

Possibly less, actually, because at least Textusa doesn't pretend to know Secret Stuff.

Re: No settlement
Me Today

In relation to Palmeras' assertion that this is an open and shut case for the Mccann's may i draw her attention to this section from Blacksmith relating to the libel claim.

I'd love her to hear his/her rebuttal and counter arguments to it.

Why on earth would anyone bother? Smiffy's tripe is barely worth the effort of reading, never mind anything else.

Will someone please check the fools to see if they have a zip up their back?